diff mbox series

[RFC,v1,1/3] clk: divider: Add re-usable determine_rate implementations

Message ID 20210517203724.1006254-2-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series clk: meson: rounding for fast clocks on 32-bit SoCs | expand

Commit Message

Martin Blumenstingl May 17, 2021, 8:37 p.m. UTC
These are useful when running on 32-bit systems to increase the upper
supported frequency limit. clk_ops.round_rate returns a signed long
which limits the maximum rate on 32-bit systems to 2^31 (or approx.
2.14GHz). clk_ops.determine_rate internally uses an unsigned long so
the maximum rate on 32-bit systems is 2^32 or approx. 4.29GHz.

Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
---
 drivers/clk/clk-divider.c    | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 include/linux/clk-provider.h |  6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Jerome Brunet May 18, 2021, 7:44 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon 17 May 2021 at 22:37, Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> wrote:

> These are useful when running on 32-bit systems to increase the upper
> supported frequency limit. clk_ops.round_rate returns a signed long
> which limits the maximum rate on 32-bit systems to 2^31 (or approx.
> 2.14GHz). clk_ops.determine_rate internally uses an unsigned long so
> the maximum rate on 32-bit systems is 2^32 or approx. 4.29GHz.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/clk-divider.c    | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/clk-provider.h |  6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> index 344997203f0e..24c94d2a3643 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> @@ -377,7 +377,6 @@ long divider_ro_round_rate_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_hw *parent,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(divider_ro_round_rate_parent);
>  
> -
>  static long clk_divider_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  				unsigned long *prate)
>  {
> @@ -399,6 +398,44 @@ static long clk_divider_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  				  divider->width, divider->flags);
>  }
>  
> +int divider_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req,
> +			   const struct clk_div_table *table, u8 width,
> +			   unsigned long flags)
> +{
> +	int div;
> +
> +	div = clk_divider_bestdiv(hw, req->best_parent_hw, req->rate,
> +				  &req->best_parent_rate, table, width, flags);
> +
> +	req->rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)req->best_parent_rate, div);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(divider_determine_rate);
> +
> +int divider_ro_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req,
> +			      const struct clk_div_table *table, u8 width,
> +			      unsigned long flags, unsigned int val)
> +{
> +	int div;
> +
> +	div = _get_div(table, val, flags, width);
> +
> +	/* Even a read-only clock can propagate a rate change */
> +	if (clk_hw_get_flags(hw) & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) {
> +		if (!req->best_parent_hw)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
> +		req->best_parent_rate = clk_hw_round_rate(req->best_parent_hw,
> +							  req->rate * div);
> +	}
> +
> +	req->rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)req->best_parent_rate, div);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(divider_ro_determine_rate);

For a final version, could you factorize the code with the .round_rate()
variant ? It would remove a bit of duplication. 

Maybe determine_rate() can also replace round_rate() in the generic
divider ops ?

> +
>  int divider_get_val(unsigned long rate, unsigned long parent_rate,
>  		    const struct clk_div_table *table, u8 width,
>  		    unsigned long flags)
> diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> index 162a2e5546a3..d83b829305c0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> @@ -629,6 +629,12 @@ long divider_ro_round_rate_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_hw *parent,
>  				  unsigned long rate, unsigned long *prate,
>  				  const struct clk_div_table *table, u8 width,
>  				  unsigned long flags, unsigned int val);
> +int divider_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req,
> +			   const struct clk_div_table *table, u8 width,
> +			   unsigned long flags);
> +int divider_ro_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req,
> +			      const struct clk_div_table *table, u8 width,
> +			      unsigned long flags, unsigned int val);
>  int divider_get_val(unsigned long rate, unsigned long parent_rate,
>  		const struct clk_div_table *table, u8 width,
>  		unsigned long flags);
Martin Blumenstingl May 18, 2021, 8:33 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Jerome,

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:44 AM Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> wrote:
[...]
> > +int divider_ro_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req,
> > +                           const struct clk_div_table *table, u8 width,
> > +                           unsigned long flags, unsigned int val)
> > +{
> > +     int div;
> > +
> > +     div = _get_div(table, val, flags, width);
> > +
> > +     /* Even a read-only clock can propagate a rate change */
> > +     if (clk_hw_get_flags(hw) & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) {
> > +             if (!req->best_parent_hw)
> > +                     return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +             req->best_parent_rate = clk_hw_round_rate(req->best_parent_hw,
> > +                                                       req->rate * div);
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     req->rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)req->best_parent_rate, div);
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(divider_ro_determine_rate);
>
> For a final version, could you factorize the code with the .round_rate()
> variant ? It would remove a bit of duplication.
my first idea was to basically let the new _determine_rate code just
forward all relevant parameters to _round_rate
however, I discarded that as it turned out to be less understandable
for me as parameters need to be mapped in both ways

while writing this mail I noticed that the opposite direction
(meaning: _round_rate forwards to _determine_rate) will probably work.
I'll give it a try in the next days
if you had anything else in mind then please let me know

> Maybe determine_rate() can also replace round_rate() in the generic
> divider ops ?
sure, I'll add that as a separate patch in this series
note to myself: testing can be done with the MMC drivers as we're
using the generic clk_divider_ops there


Best regards,
Martin
Jerome Brunet May 19, 2021, 12:31 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue 18 May 2021 at 22:33, Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jerome,
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:44 AM Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> wrote:
> [...]
>> > +int divider_ro_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req,
>> > +                           const struct clk_div_table *table, u8 width,
>> > +                           unsigned long flags, unsigned int val)
>> > +{
>> > +     int div;
>> > +
>> > +     div = _get_div(table, val, flags, width);
>> > +
>> > +     /* Even a read-only clock can propagate a rate change */
>> > +     if (clk_hw_get_flags(hw) & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) {
>> > +             if (!req->best_parent_hw)
>> > +                     return -EINVAL;
>> > +
>> > +             req->best_parent_rate = clk_hw_round_rate(req->best_parent_hw,
>> > +                                                       req->rate * div);
>> > +     }
>> > +
>> > +     req->rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)req->best_parent_rate, div);
>> > +
>> > +     return 0;
>> > +}
>> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(divider_ro_determine_rate);
>>
>> For a final version, could you factorize the code with the .round_rate()
>> variant ? It would remove a bit of duplication.
> my first idea was to basically let the new _determine_rate code just
> forward all relevant parameters to _round_rate
> however, I discarded that as it turned out to be less understandable
> for me as parameters need to be mapped in both ways
>
> while writing this mail I noticed that the opposite direction
> (meaning: _round_rate forwards to _determine_rate) will probably work.
> I'll give it a try in the next days
> if you had anything else in mind then please let me know

Yep, the idea would be to use the determine_rate() part as the common
implementation. AFAICT, all you need is to build req_rate structure in
the round_rate() part.

>
>> Maybe determine_rate() can also replace round_rate() in the generic
>> divider ops ?
> sure, I'll add that as a separate patch in this series
> note to myself: testing can be done with the MMC drivers as we're
> using the generic clk_divider_ops there
>
>
> Best regards,
> Martin
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
index 344997203f0e..24c94d2a3643 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
@@ -377,7 +377,6 @@  long divider_ro_round_rate_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_hw *parent,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(divider_ro_round_rate_parent);
 
-
 static long clk_divider_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
 				unsigned long *prate)
 {
@@ -399,6 +398,44 @@  static long clk_divider_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
 				  divider->width, divider->flags);
 }
 
+int divider_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req,
+			   const struct clk_div_table *table, u8 width,
+			   unsigned long flags)
+{
+	int div;
+
+	div = clk_divider_bestdiv(hw, req->best_parent_hw, req->rate,
+				  &req->best_parent_rate, table, width, flags);
+
+	req->rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)req->best_parent_rate, div);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(divider_determine_rate);
+
+int divider_ro_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req,
+			      const struct clk_div_table *table, u8 width,
+			      unsigned long flags, unsigned int val)
+{
+	int div;
+
+	div = _get_div(table, val, flags, width);
+
+	/* Even a read-only clock can propagate a rate change */
+	if (clk_hw_get_flags(hw) & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) {
+		if (!req->best_parent_hw)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		req->best_parent_rate = clk_hw_round_rate(req->best_parent_hw,
+							  req->rate * div);
+	}
+
+	req->rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)req->best_parent_rate, div);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(divider_ro_determine_rate);
+
 int divider_get_val(unsigned long rate, unsigned long parent_rate,
 		    const struct clk_div_table *table, u8 width,
 		    unsigned long flags)
diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
index 162a2e5546a3..d83b829305c0 100644
--- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
+++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
@@ -629,6 +629,12 @@  long divider_ro_round_rate_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_hw *parent,
 				  unsigned long rate, unsigned long *prate,
 				  const struct clk_div_table *table, u8 width,
 				  unsigned long flags, unsigned int val);
+int divider_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req,
+			   const struct clk_div_table *table, u8 width,
+			   unsigned long flags);
+int divider_ro_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req,
+			      const struct clk_div_table *table, u8 width,
+			      unsigned long flags, unsigned int val);
 int divider_get_val(unsigned long rate, unsigned long parent_rate,
 		const struct clk_div_table *table, u8 width,
 		unsigned long flags);