From patchwork Wed Jun 2 16:47:04 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Will Deacon X-Patchwork-Id: 12295325 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60CAC47097 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:50:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD95D61C46 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:50:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AD95D61C46 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=NOvSTTJwqFXdCfNlvjsf6lrfC2OIgLalZ14zueVxKOw=; b=OtEzYI2ksH1EjN 6Gpj+IRJer0sqjxIQYqp8pdn5gjxJbJE/Ek21C4GXoXb6HqvidAokK+eJrrhErQLUUbYlIrQaxssY 2CqZ16lb4y7OqV4hESPGxD1dlRxmiOwvQn9SPwgAp8bMjYsAg+LuvZUYCG+hvDL+8WFcOoYiSW04U ualsKB/L+SYA+dkMejO3ESQoqO1UvQ21P2OQS/5OJG6iH8RzhLdJuvRxIRMNtUvHhAcftHdqXrnlX GU3Rx48iSBUAnXa8Dv/SkMloiIkP9QA14Utwzj5U64H+C1wcWX56N3Wg+8fw2vrCIdLsv07eGIlpo NSBygQ3jI/Oo0v+cfuvQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1loU36-005FgG-GK; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 16:48:57 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1loU1z-005F4Z-9E for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 16:47:48 +0000 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79B0060FEE; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:47:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1622652466; bh=54/3ftGbhAqYB2zkIAlkLNmK71euFTa3aidQ08sv9yc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=o0TRjNgWm+g1QHRCM3u6xaRrrB0ESIHvJZHhHInHaI5yaCymewEQt0US3An3Swe5B CSmxV6LHwhqJ6v1haP8+VGozv3XAH23lF73KAXGOSKdpSbnpXcbuSIc1fJApbDOSHK orBXZv8Q7z6rJIx+MgvDxsoYaukO823pgR3f1P5leDMpmJJ7tF8LC9qHvFg3Tb2Jg/ DhADy0ZNeiaZnljHTVVikUxr3vaUi2bQR8MruT+qURY6ElGdpiHz2UJTm//9lqiQAI +81leSWQIJIo4/22HADEqBqk/mTnGFl7nUvPoQCJc5BOZzGV5oHXlzIyNNpUlmJJ/Z v3X5zrgMCcueQ== From: Will Deacon To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , Marc Zyngier , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Peter Zijlstra , Morten Rasmussen , Qais Yousef , Suren Baghdasaryan , Quentin Perret , Tejun Heo , Johannes Weiner , Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Dietmar Eggemann , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Valentin Schneider , kernel-team@android.com Subject: [PATCH v8 04/19] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 17:47:04 +0100 Message-Id: <20210602164719.31777-5-will@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20210602164719.31777-1-will@kernel.org> References: <20210602164719.31777-1-will@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210602_094747_389856_062136C9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.88 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Scheduling a 32-bit application on a 64-bit-only CPU is a bad idea. Ensure that 32-bit applications always take the slow-path when returning to userspace on a system with mismatched support at EL0, so that we can avoid trying to run on a 64-bit-only CPU and force a SIGKILL instead. Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Will Deacon --- arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c index b4bb67f17a2c..f4a91bf1ce0c 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c @@ -527,6 +527,15 @@ static void erratum_1418040_thread_switch(struct task_struct *prev, write_sysreg(val, cntkctl_el1); } +static void compat_thread_switch(struct task_struct *next) +{ + if (!is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(next))) + return; + + if (static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0)) + set_tsk_thread_flag(next, TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME); +} + static void update_sctlr_el1(u64 sctlr) { /* @@ -568,6 +577,7 @@ __notrace_funcgraph struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev, ssbs_thread_switch(next); erratum_1418040_thread_switch(prev, next); ptrauth_thread_switch_user(next); + compat_thread_switch(next); /* * Complete any pending TLB or cache maintenance on this CPU in case @@ -633,8 +643,15 @@ unsigned long arch_align_stack(unsigned long sp) */ void arch_setup_new_exec(void) { - current->mm->context.flags = is_compat_task() ? MMCF_AARCH32 : 0; + unsigned long mmflags = 0; + + if (is_compat_task()) { + mmflags = MMCF_AARCH32; + if (static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0)) + set_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME); + } + current->mm->context.flags = mmflags; ptrauth_thread_init_user(); mte_thread_init_user(); diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c index 6237486ff6bb..f8192f4ae0b8 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c @@ -911,6 +911,19 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs) restore_saved_sigmask(); } +static bool cpu_affinity_invalid(struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + if (!compat_user_mode(regs)) + return false; + + /* + * We're preemptible, but a reschedule will cause us to check the + * affinity again. + */ + return !cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), + system_32bit_el0_cpumask()); +} + asmlinkage void do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long thread_flags) { @@ -938,6 +951,19 @@ asmlinkage void do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs, if (thread_flags & _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME) { tracehook_notify_resume(regs); rseq_handle_notify_resume(NULL, regs); + + /* + * If we reschedule after checking the affinity + * then we must ensure that TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME + * is set so that we check the affinity again. + * Since tracehook_notify_resume() clears the + * flag, ensure that the compiler doesn't move + * it after the affinity check. + */ + barrier(); + + if (cpu_affinity_invalid(regs)) + force_sig(SIGKILL); } if (thread_flags & _TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE)