Message ID | 20210812190603.25326-2-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks | expand |
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 02:06:00PM -0500, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote: > From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> > > Currently, there are multiple functions in ARM64 code that walk the > stack using start_backtrace() and unwind_frame(). Convert all of > them to use arch_stack_walk(). This makes maintenance easier. It would be good to split this into a series of patches as Mark Brown suggested in v7. > Here is the list of functions: > > perf_callchain_kernel() > get_wchan() > return_address() > dump_backtrace() > profile_pc() Note that arch_stack_walk() depends on CONFIG_STACKTRACE (which is not in defconfig), so we'll need to reorganise things such that it's always defined, or factor out the core of that function and add a wrapper such that we can always use it. > Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 3 --- > arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c | 5 +--- > arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++----------- > arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c | 6 +---- > arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 38 +++------------------------- > arch/arm64/kernel/time.c | 22 +++++++++------- > 6 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h > index 8aebc00c1718..e43dea1c6b41 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h > @@ -61,9 +61,6 @@ struct stackframe { > #endif > }; > > -extern int unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame); > -extern void walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame, > - bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *data); > extern void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk, > const char *loglvl); > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c > index 4a72c2727309..2f289013c9c9 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c > @@ -147,15 +147,12 @@ static bool callchain_trace(void *data, unsigned long pc) > void perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, > struct pt_regs *regs) > { > - struct stackframe frame; > - > if (perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->is_in_guest()) { > /* We don't support guest os callchain now */ > return; > } > > - start_backtrace(&frame, regs->regs[29], regs->pc); > - walk_stackframe(current, &frame, callchain_trace, entry); > + arch_stack_walk(callchain_trace, entry, current, regs); > } We can also update callchain_trace take the return value of perf_callchain_store into acount, e.g. | static bool callchain_trace(void *data, unsigned long pc) | { | struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry = data; | return perf_callchain_store(entry, pc) == 0; | } > > unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs) > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c > index c8989b999250..52c12fd26407 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c > @@ -544,11 +544,28 @@ __notrace_funcgraph struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev, > return last; > } > > +struct wchan_info { > + unsigned long pc; > + int count; > +}; > + > +static bool get_wchan_cb(void *arg, unsigned long pc) > +{ > + struct wchan_info *wchan_info = arg; > + > + if (!in_sched_functions(pc)) { > + wchan_info->pc = pc; > + return false; > + } > + wchan_info->count--; > + return !!wchan_info->count; > +} This will terminate one entry earlier than the old logic since we used to use a post-increment (testing the prior value), and now we're effectively using a pre-decrement (testing the new value). I don't think that matters all that much in practice, but it might be best to keep the original logic, e.g. initialize `count` to 0 and here do: return wchan_info->count++ < 16; > + > unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p) > { > - struct stackframe frame; > - unsigned long stack_page, ret = 0; > - int count = 0; > + unsigned long stack_page; > + struct wchan_info wchan_info; > + > if (!p || p == current || task_is_running(p)) > return 0; > > @@ -556,20 +573,12 @@ unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p) > if (!stack_page) > return 0; > > - start_backtrace(&frame, thread_saved_fp(p), thread_saved_pc(p)); > + wchan_info.pc = 0; > + wchan_info.count = 16; > + arch_stack_walk(get_wchan_cb, &wchan_info, p, NULL); > > - do { > - if (unwind_frame(p, &frame)) > - goto out; > - if (!in_sched_functions(frame.pc)) { > - ret = frame.pc; > - goto out; > - } > - } while (count++ < 16); > - > -out: > put_task_stack(p); > - return ret; > + return wchan_info.pc; > } Other than the comment above, this looks good to me. > unsigned long arch_align_stack(unsigned long sp) > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c > index a6d18755652f..92a0f4d434e4 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c > @@ -35,15 +35,11 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(save_return_addr); > void *return_address(unsigned int level) > { > struct return_address_data data; > - struct stackframe frame; > > data.level = level + 2; > data.addr = NULL; > > - start_backtrace(&frame, > - (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0), > - (unsigned long)return_address); > - walk_stackframe(current, &frame, save_return_addr, &data); > + arch_stack_walk(save_return_addr, &data, current, NULL); > > if (!data.level) > return data.addr; Nor that arch_stack_walk() will start with it's caller, so return_address() will be included in the trace where it wasn't previously, which implies we need to skip an additional level. That said, I'm not entirely sure why we need to skip 2 levels today; it might be worth checking that's correct. We should also mark return_address() as noinline to avoid surprises with LTO. > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c > index 8982a2b78acf..1800310f92be 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c > @@ -151,23 +151,21 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame, > } > NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(walk_stackframe); > > -static void dump_backtrace_entry(unsigned long where, const char *loglvl) > +static bool dump_backtrace_entry(void *arg, unsigned long where) > { > + char *loglvl = arg; > printk("%s %pSb\n", loglvl, (void *)where); > + return true; > } > > void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk, > const char *loglvl) > { > - struct stackframe frame; > - int skip = 0; > - > pr_debug("%s(regs = %p tsk = %p)\n", __func__, regs, tsk); > > if (regs) { > if (user_mode(regs)) > return; > - skip = 1; > } We can simplifiy this to: if (regs && user_mode(regs)) return; > > if (!tsk) > @@ -176,36 +174,8 @@ void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk, > if (!try_get_task_stack(tsk)) > return; > > - if (tsk == current) { > - start_backtrace(&frame, > - (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0), > - (unsigned long)dump_backtrace); > - } else { > - /* > - * task blocked in __switch_to > - */ > - start_backtrace(&frame, > - thread_saved_fp(tsk), > - thread_saved_pc(tsk)); > - } > - > printk("%sCall trace:\n", loglvl); > - do { > - /* skip until specified stack frame */ > - if (!skip) { > - dump_backtrace_entry(frame.pc, loglvl); > - } else if (frame.fp == regs->regs[29]) { > - skip = 0; > - /* > - * Mostly, this is the case where this function is > - * called in panic/abort. As exception handler's > - * stack frame does not contain the corresponding pc > - * at which an exception has taken place, use regs->pc > - * instead. > - */ > - dump_backtrace_entry(regs->pc, loglvl); > - } > - } while (!unwind_frame(tsk, &frame)); > + arch_stack_walk(dump_backtrace_entry, (void *)loglvl, tsk, regs); It turns out we currently need this skipping to get the balance the ftrace call stack, and arch_stack_walk() doesn't currently do the right thing when starting from regs. That balancing isn't quite right, and will be wrong in some case when unwinding across exception boundaries; we could implement HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RET_ADDR_PTR using the FP to solve that. > > put_task_stack(tsk); > } > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c > index eebbc8d7123e..671b3038a772 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c > @@ -32,22 +32,26 @@ > #include <asm/stacktrace.h> > #include <asm/paravirt.h> > > +static bool profile_pc_cb(void *arg, unsigned long pc) > +{ > + unsigned long *prof_pc = arg; > + > + if (in_lock_functions(pc)) > + return true; > + *prof_pc = pc; > + return false; > +} > + > unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs) > { > - struct stackframe frame; > + unsigned long prof_pc = 0; > > if (!in_lock_functions(regs->pc)) > return regs->pc; > > - start_backtrace(&frame, regs->regs[29], regs->pc); > - > - do { > - int ret = unwind_frame(NULL, &frame); > - if (ret < 0) > - return 0; > - } while (in_lock_functions(frame.pc)); > + arch_stack_walk(profile_pc_cb, &prof_pc, current, regs); > > - return frame.pc; > + return prof_pc; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(profile_pc); Mdoulo the problem above w.r.t. unwinding from regs, this looks good. Thanks, Mark. > > -- > 2.25.1 >
Thanks for the review. Responses inline... On 8/24/21 8:13 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 02:06:00PM -0500, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote: >> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> >> >> Currently, there are multiple functions in ARM64 code that walk the >> stack using start_backtrace() and unwind_frame(). Convert all of >> them to use arch_stack_walk(). This makes maintenance easier. > > It would be good to split this into a series of patches as Mark Brown > suggested in v7. > Will do. >> Here is the list of functions: >> >> perf_callchain_kernel() >> get_wchan() >> return_address() >> dump_backtrace() >> profile_pc() > > Note that arch_stack_walk() depends on CONFIG_STACKTRACE (which is not in > defconfig), so we'll need to reorganise things such that it's always defined, > or factor out the core of that function and add a wrapper such that we > can always use it. > I will include CONFIG_STACKTRACE in defconfig, if that is OK with you and Mark Brown. >> Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> >> --- >> arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 3 --- >> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c | 5 +--- >> arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++----------- >> arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c | 6 +---- >> arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 38 +++------------------------- >> arch/arm64/kernel/time.c | 22 +++++++++------- >> 6 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h >> index 8aebc00c1718..e43dea1c6b41 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h >> @@ -61,9 +61,6 @@ struct stackframe { >> #endif >> }; >> >> -extern int unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame); >> -extern void walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame, >> - bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *data); >> extern void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk, >> const char *loglvl); >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c >> index 4a72c2727309..2f289013c9c9 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c >> @@ -147,15 +147,12 @@ static bool callchain_trace(void *data, unsigned long pc) >> void perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, >> struct pt_regs *regs) >> { >> - struct stackframe frame; >> - >> if (perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->is_in_guest()) { >> /* We don't support guest os callchain now */ >> return; >> } >> >> - start_backtrace(&frame, regs->regs[29], regs->pc); >> - walk_stackframe(current, &frame, callchain_trace, entry); >> + arch_stack_walk(callchain_trace, entry, current, regs); >> } > > We can also update callchain_trace take the return value of > perf_callchain_store into acount, e.g. > > | static bool callchain_trace(void *data, unsigned long pc) > | { > | struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry = data; > | return perf_callchain_store(entry, pc) == 0; > | } > OK. >> >> unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs) >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c >> index c8989b999250..52c12fd26407 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c >> @@ -544,11 +544,28 @@ __notrace_funcgraph struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev, >> return last; >> } >> >> +struct wchan_info { >> + unsigned long pc; >> + int count; >> +}; >> + >> +static bool get_wchan_cb(void *arg, unsigned long pc) >> +{ >> + struct wchan_info *wchan_info = arg; >> + >> + if (!in_sched_functions(pc)) { >> + wchan_info->pc = pc; >> + return false; >> + } >> + wchan_info->count--; >> + return !!wchan_info->count; >> +} > > This will terminate one entry earlier than the old logic since we used > to use a post-increment (testing the prior value), and now we're > effectively using a pre-decrement (testing the new value). > > I don't think that matters all that much in practice, but it might be > best to keep the original logic, e.g. initialize `count` to 0 and here > do: > > return wchan_info->count++ < 16; > The reason I did it this way is that with the old logic the actual limit implemented is 17 instead of 16. That seemed odd. But I could do it the way you have suggested. >> + >> unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p) >> { >> - struct stackframe frame; >> - unsigned long stack_page, ret = 0; >> - int count = 0; >> + unsigned long stack_page; >> + struct wchan_info wchan_info; >> + >> if (!p || p == current || task_is_running(p)) >> return 0; >> >> @@ -556,20 +573,12 @@ unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p) >> if (!stack_page) >> return 0; >> >> - start_backtrace(&frame, thread_saved_fp(p), thread_saved_pc(p)); >> + wchan_info.pc = 0; >> + wchan_info.count = 16; >> + arch_stack_walk(get_wchan_cb, &wchan_info, p, NULL); >> >> - do { >> - if (unwind_frame(p, &frame)) >> - goto out; >> - if (!in_sched_functions(frame.pc)) { >> - ret = frame.pc; >> - goto out; >> - } >> - } while (count++ < 16); >> - >> -out: >> put_task_stack(p); >> - return ret; >> + return wchan_info.pc; >> } > > Other than the comment above, this looks good to me. > OK. >> unsigned long arch_align_stack(unsigned long sp) >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c >> index a6d18755652f..92a0f4d434e4 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c >> @@ -35,15 +35,11 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(save_return_addr); >> void *return_address(unsigned int level) >> { >> struct return_address_data data; >> - struct stackframe frame; >> >> data.level = level + 2; >> data.addr = NULL; >> >> - start_backtrace(&frame, >> - (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0), >> - (unsigned long)return_address); >> - walk_stackframe(current, &frame, save_return_addr, &data); >> + arch_stack_walk(save_return_addr, &data, current, NULL); >> >> if (!data.level) >> return data.addr; > > Nor that arch_stack_walk() will start with it's caller, so > return_address() will be included in the trace where it wasn't > previously, which implies we need to skip an additional level. > You are correct. I will fix this. Thanks for catching this. > That said, I'm not entirely sure why we need to skip 2 levels today; it > might be worth checking that's correct. > AFAICT, return_address() acts like builtin_return_address(). That is, it returns the address of the caller. If func() calls return_address(), func() wants its caller's address. So, return_address() and func() need to be skipped. I will change it to skip 3 levels instead of 2. > We should also mark return_address() as noinline to avoid surprises with > LTO. > Will do. >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c >> index 8982a2b78acf..1800310f92be 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c >> @@ -151,23 +151,21 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame, >> } >> NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(walk_stackframe); >> >> -static void dump_backtrace_entry(unsigned long where, const char *loglvl) >> +static bool dump_backtrace_entry(void *arg, unsigned long where) >> { >> + char *loglvl = arg; >> printk("%s %pSb\n", loglvl, (void *)where); >> + return true; >> } >> >> void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk, >> const char *loglvl) >> { >> - struct stackframe frame; >> - int skip = 0; >> - >> pr_debug("%s(regs = %p tsk = %p)\n", __func__, regs, tsk); >> >> if (regs) { >> if (user_mode(regs)) >> return; >> - skip = 1; >> } > > We can simplifiy this to: > > if (regs && user_mode(regs)) > return; > OK. >> >> if (!tsk) >> @@ -176,36 +174,8 @@ void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk, >> if (!try_get_task_stack(tsk)) >> return; >> >> - if (tsk == current) { >> - start_backtrace(&frame, >> - (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0), >> - (unsigned long)dump_backtrace); >> - } else { >> - /* >> - * task blocked in __switch_to >> - */ >> - start_backtrace(&frame, >> - thread_saved_fp(tsk), >> - thread_saved_pc(tsk)); >> - } >> - >> printk("%sCall trace:\n", loglvl); >> - do { >> - /* skip until specified stack frame */ >> - if (!skip) { >> - dump_backtrace_entry(frame.pc, loglvl); >> - } else if (frame.fp == regs->regs[29]) { >> - skip = 0; >> - /* >> - * Mostly, this is the case where this function is >> - * called in panic/abort. As exception handler's >> - * stack frame does not contain the corresponding pc >> - * at which an exception has taken place, use regs->pc >> - * instead. >> - */ >> - dump_backtrace_entry(regs->pc, loglvl); >> - } >> - } while (!unwind_frame(tsk, &frame)); >> + arch_stack_walk(dump_backtrace_entry, (void *)loglvl, tsk, regs); > > It turns out we currently need this skipping to get the balance the > ftrace call stack, and arch_stack_walk() doesn't currently do the right > thing when starting from regs. That balancing isn't quite right, and > will be wrong in some case when unwinding across exception boundaries; > we could implement HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RET_ADDR_PTR using the FP to > solve that. > I am not sure that I completely understand. So, I will study this and get back to you with any questions. >> >> put_task_stack(tsk); >> } >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c >> index eebbc8d7123e..671b3038a772 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c >> @@ -32,22 +32,26 @@ >> #include <asm/stacktrace.h> >> #include <asm/paravirt.h> >> >> +static bool profile_pc_cb(void *arg, unsigned long pc) >> +{ >> + unsigned long *prof_pc = arg; >> + >> + if (in_lock_functions(pc)) >> + return true; >> + *prof_pc = pc; >> + return false; >> +} >> + >> unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs) >> { >> - struct stackframe frame; >> + unsigned long prof_pc = 0; >> >> if (!in_lock_functions(regs->pc)) >> return regs->pc; >> >> - start_backtrace(&frame, regs->regs[29], regs->pc); >> - >> - do { >> - int ret = unwind_frame(NULL, &frame); >> - if (ret < 0) >> - return 0; >> - } while (in_lock_functions(frame.pc)); >> + arch_stack_walk(profile_pc_cb, &prof_pc, current, regs); >> >> - return frame.pc; >> + return prof_pc; >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(profile_pc); > > Mdoulo the problem above w.r.t. unwinding from regs, this looks good. > Great. Thanks. Madhavan
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c >>> index a6d18755652f..92a0f4d434e4 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c >>> @@ -35,15 +35,11 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(save_return_addr); >>> void *return_address(unsigned int level) >>> { >>> struct return_address_data data; >>> - struct stackframe frame; >>> >>> data.level = level + 2; >>> data.addr = NULL; >>> >>> - start_backtrace(&frame, >>> - (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0), >>> - (unsigned long)return_address); >>> - walk_stackframe(current, &frame, save_return_addr, &data); >>> + arch_stack_walk(save_return_addr, &data, current, NULL); >>> >>> if (!data.level) >>> return data.addr; >> >> Nor that arch_stack_walk() will start with it's caller, so >> return_address() will be included in the trace where it wasn't >> previously, which implies we need to skip an additional level. >> > > You are correct. I will fix this. Thanks for catching this. > >> That said, I'm not entirely sure why we need to skip 2 levels today; it >> might be worth checking that's correct. >> > > AFAICT, return_address() acts like builtin_return_address(). That is, it > returns the address of the caller. If func() calls return_address(), > func() wants its caller's address. So, return_address() and func() need to > be skipped. > > I will change it to skip 3 levels instead of 2. > Actually, I take that back. I remember now. return_address() used to start with PC=return_address(). That is, it used to start with itself. arch_stack_walk() starts with its caller which, in this case, is return_address(). So, I don't need to change anything. Do you agree? Madhavan
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 12:21:28PM -0500, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote: > On 8/24/21 8:13 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 02:06:00PM -0500, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote: > > Note that arch_stack_walk() depends on CONFIG_STACKTRACE (which is not in > > defconfig), so we'll need to reorganise things such that it's always defined, > > or factor out the core of that function and add a wrapper such that we > > can always use it. > I will include CONFIG_STACKTRACE in defconfig, if that is OK with you and > Mark Brown. That might be separately useful but it doesn't address the issue, if something is optional we need to handle the case where that option is disabled. It'll need to be one of the two options Mark Rutland mentioned above.
On 8/24/21 12:38 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 12:21:28PM -0500, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote: >> On 8/24/21 8:13 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 02:06:00PM -0500, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote: > >>> Note that arch_stack_walk() depends on CONFIG_STACKTRACE (which is not in >>> defconfig), so we'll need to reorganise things such that it's always defined, >>> or factor out the core of that function and add a wrapper such that we >>> can always use it. > >> I will include CONFIG_STACKTRACE in defconfig, if that is OK with you and >> Mark Brown. > > That might be separately useful but it doesn't address the issue, if > something is optional we need to handle the case where that option is > disabled. It'll need to be one of the two options Mark Rutland > mentioned above. > OK. I will do it so it is always defined. Thanks. Madhavan
Hi Mark Rutland, Mark Brown, Do you have any comments on the reliability part of the patch series? Madhavan On 8/24/21 8:13 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 02:06:00PM -0500, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote: >> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> >> >> Currently, there are multiple functions in ARM64 code that walk the >> stack using start_backtrace() and unwind_frame(). Convert all of >> them to use arch_stack_walk(). This makes maintenance easier. > > It would be good to split this into a series of patches as Mark Brown > suggested in v7. > >> Here is the list of functions: >> >> perf_callchain_kernel() >> get_wchan() >> return_address() >> dump_backtrace() >> profile_pc() > > Note that arch_stack_walk() depends on CONFIG_STACKTRACE (which is not in > defconfig), so we'll need to reorganise things such that it's always defined, > or factor out the core of that function and add a wrapper such that we > can always use it. > >> Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> >> --- >> arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 3 --- >> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c | 5 +--- >> arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++----------- >> arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c | 6 +---- >> arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 38 +++------------------------- >> arch/arm64/kernel/time.c | 22 +++++++++------- >> 6 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h >> index 8aebc00c1718..e43dea1c6b41 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h >> @@ -61,9 +61,6 @@ struct stackframe { >> #endif >> }; >> >> -extern int unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame); >> -extern void walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame, >> - bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *data); >> extern void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk, >> const char *loglvl); >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c >> index 4a72c2727309..2f289013c9c9 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c >> @@ -147,15 +147,12 @@ static bool callchain_trace(void *data, unsigned long pc) >> void perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, >> struct pt_regs *regs) >> { >> - struct stackframe frame; >> - >> if (perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->is_in_guest()) { >> /* We don't support guest os callchain now */ >> return; >> } >> >> - start_backtrace(&frame, regs->regs[29], regs->pc); >> - walk_stackframe(current, &frame, callchain_trace, entry); >> + arch_stack_walk(callchain_trace, entry, current, regs); >> } > > We can also update callchain_trace take the return value of > perf_callchain_store into acount, e.g. > > | static bool callchain_trace(void *data, unsigned long pc) > | { > | struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry = data; > | return perf_callchain_store(entry, pc) == 0; > | } > >> >> unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs) >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c >> index c8989b999250..52c12fd26407 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c >> @@ -544,11 +544,28 @@ __notrace_funcgraph struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev, >> return last; >> } >> >> +struct wchan_info { >> + unsigned long pc; >> + int count; >> +}; >> + >> +static bool get_wchan_cb(void *arg, unsigned long pc) >> +{ >> + struct wchan_info *wchan_info = arg; >> + >> + if (!in_sched_functions(pc)) { >> + wchan_info->pc = pc; >> + return false; >> + } >> + wchan_info->count--; >> + return !!wchan_info->count; >> +} > > This will terminate one entry earlier than the old logic since we used > to use a post-increment (testing the prior value), and now we're > effectively using a pre-decrement (testing the new value). > > I don't think that matters all that much in practice, but it might be > best to keep the original logic, e.g. initialize `count` to 0 and here > do: > > return wchan_info->count++ < 16; > >> + >> unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p) >> { >> - struct stackframe frame; >> - unsigned long stack_page, ret = 0; >> - int count = 0; >> + unsigned long stack_page; >> + struct wchan_info wchan_info; >> + >> if (!p || p == current || task_is_running(p)) >> return 0; >> >> @@ -556,20 +573,12 @@ unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p) >> if (!stack_page) >> return 0; >> >> - start_backtrace(&frame, thread_saved_fp(p), thread_saved_pc(p)); >> + wchan_info.pc = 0; >> + wchan_info.count = 16; >> + arch_stack_walk(get_wchan_cb, &wchan_info, p, NULL); >> >> - do { >> - if (unwind_frame(p, &frame)) >> - goto out; >> - if (!in_sched_functions(frame.pc)) { >> - ret = frame.pc; >> - goto out; >> - } >> - } while (count++ < 16); >> - >> -out: >> put_task_stack(p); >> - return ret; >> + return wchan_info.pc; >> } > > Other than the comment above, this looks good to me. > >> unsigned long arch_align_stack(unsigned long sp) >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c >> index a6d18755652f..92a0f4d434e4 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c >> @@ -35,15 +35,11 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(save_return_addr); >> void *return_address(unsigned int level) >> { >> struct return_address_data data; >> - struct stackframe frame; >> >> data.level = level + 2; >> data.addr = NULL; >> >> - start_backtrace(&frame, >> - (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0), >> - (unsigned long)return_address); >> - walk_stackframe(current, &frame, save_return_addr, &data); >> + arch_stack_walk(save_return_addr, &data, current, NULL); >> >> if (!data.level) >> return data.addr; > > Nor that arch_stack_walk() will start with it's caller, so > return_address() will be included in the trace where it wasn't > previously, which implies we need to skip an additional level. > > That said, I'm not entirely sure why we need to skip 2 levels today; it > might be worth checking that's correct. > > We should also mark return_address() as noinline to avoid surprises with > LTO. > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c >> index 8982a2b78acf..1800310f92be 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c >> @@ -151,23 +151,21 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame, >> } >> NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(walk_stackframe); >> >> -static void dump_backtrace_entry(unsigned long where, const char *loglvl) >> +static bool dump_backtrace_entry(void *arg, unsigned long where) >> { >> + char *loglvl = arg; >> printk("%s %pSb\n", loglvl, (void *)where); >> + return true; >> } >> >> void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk, >> const char *loglvl) >> { >> - struct stackframe frame; >> - int skip = 0; >> - >> pr_debug("%s(regs = %p tsk = %p)\n", __func__, regs, tsk); >> >> if (regs) { >> if (user_mode(regs)) >> return; >> - skip = 1; >> } > > We can simplifiy this to: > > if (regs && user_mode(regs)) > return; > >> >> if (!tsk) >> @@ -176,36 +174,8 @@ void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk, >> if (!try_get_task_stack(tsk)) >> return; >> >> - if (tsk == current) { >> - start_backtrace(&frame, >> - (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0), >> - (unsigned long)dump_backtrace); >> - } else { >> - /* >> - * task blocked in __switch_to >> - */ >> - start_backtrace(&frame, >> - thread_saved_fp(tsk), >> - thread_saved_pc(tsk)); >> - } >> - >> printk("%sCall trace:\n", loglvl); >> - do { >> - /* skip until specified stack frame */ >> - if (!skip) { >> - dump_backtrace_entry(frame.pc, loglvl); >> - } else if (frame.fp == regs->regs[29]) { >> - skip = 0; >> - /* >> - * Mostly, this is the case where this function is >> - * called in panic/abort. As exception handler's >> - * stack frame does not contain the corresponding pc >> - * at which an exception has taken place, use regs->pc >> - * instead. >> - */ >> - dump_backtrace_entry(regs->pc, loglvl); >> - } >> - } while (!unwind_frame(tsk, &frame)); >> + arch_stack_walk(dump_backtrace_entry, (void *)loglvl, tsk, regs); > > It turns out we currently need this skipping to get the balance the > ftrace call stack, and arch_stack_walk() doesn't currently do the right > thing when starting from regs. That balancing isn't quite right, and > will be wrong in some case when unwinding across exception boundaries; > we could implement HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RET_ADDR_PTR using the FP to > solve that. > >> >> put_task_stack(tsk); >> } >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c >> index eebbc8d7123e..671b3038a772 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c >> @@ -32,22 +32,26 @@ >> #include <asm/stacktrace.h> >> #include <asm/paravirt.h> >> >> +static bool profile_pc_cb(void *arg, unsigned long pc) >> +{ >> + unsigned long *prof_pc = arg; >> + >> + if (in_lock_functions(pc)) >> + return true; >> + *prof_pc = pc; >> + return false; >> +} >> + >> unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs) >> { >> - struct stackframe frame; >> + unsigned long prof_pc = 0; >> >> if (!in_lock_functions(regs->pc)) >> return regs->pc; >> >> - start_backtrace(&frame, regs->regs[29], regs->pc); >> - >> - do { >> - int ret = unwind_frame(NULL, &frame); >> - if (ret < 0) >> - return 0; >> - } while (in_lock_functions(frame.pc)); >> + arch_stack_walk(profile_pc_cb, &prof_pc, current, regs); >> >> - return frame.pc; >> + return prof_pc; >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(profile_pc); > > Mdoulo the problem above w.r.t. unwinding from regs, this looks good. > > Thanks, > Mark. > >> >> -- >> 2.25.1 >>
On 8/24/21 8:13 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 02:06:00PM -0500, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote: >> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> >> >> Currently, there are multiple functions in ARM64 code that walk the >> stack using start_backtrace() and unwind_frame(). Convert all of >> them to use arch_stack_walk(). This makes maintenance easier. > > It would be good to split this into a series of patches as Mark Brown > suggested in v7. > >> Here is the list of functions: >> >> perf_callchain_kernel() >> get_wchan() >> return_address() >> dump_backtrace() >> profile_pc() > > Note that arch_stack_walk() depends on CONFIG_STACKTRACE (which is not in > defconfig), so we'll need to reorganise things such that it's always defined, > or factor out the core of that function and add a wrapper such that we > can always use it. > >> Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> >> --- >> arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 3 --- >> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c | 5 +--- >> arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++----------- >> arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c | 6 +---- >> arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 38 +++------------------------- >> arch/arm64/kernel/time.c | 22 +++++++++------- >> 6 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h >> index 8aebc00c1718..e43dea1c6b41 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h >> @@ -61,9 +61,6 @@ struct stackframe { >> #endif >> }; >> >> -extern int unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame); >> -extern void walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame, >> - bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *data); >> extern void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk, >> const char *loglvl); >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c >> index 4a72c2727309..2f289013c9c9 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c >> @@ -147,15 +147,12 @@ static bool callchain_trace(void *data, unsigned long pc) >> void perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, >> struct pt_regs *regs) >> { >> - struct stackframe frame; >> - >> if (perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->is_in_guest()) { >> /* We don't support guest os callchain now */ >> return; >> } >> >> - start_backtrace(&frame, regs->regs[29], regs->pc); >> - walk_stackframe(current, &frame, callchain_trace, entry); >> + arch_stack_walk(callchain_trace, entry, current, regs); >> } > > We can also update callchain_trace take the return value of > perf_callchain_store into acount, e.g. > > | static bool callchain_trace(void *data, unsigned long pc) > | { > | struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry = data; > | return perf_callchain_store(entry, pc) == 0; > | } > >> >> unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs) >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c >> index c8989b999250..52c12fd26407 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c >> @@ -544,11 +544,28 @@ __notrace_funcgraph struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev, >> return last; >> } >> >> +struct wchan_info { >> + unsigned long pc; >> + int count; >> +}; >> + >> +static bool get_wchan_cb(void *arg, unsigned long pc) >> +{ >> + struct wchan_info *wchan_info = arg; >> + >> + if (!in_sched_functions(pc)) { >> + wchan_info->pc = pc; >> + return false; >> + } >> + wchan_info->count--; >> + return !!wchan_info->count; >> +} > > This will terminate one entry earlier than the old logic since we used > to use a post-increment (testing the prior value), and now we're > effectively using a pre-decrement (testing the new value). > > I don't think that matters all that much in practice, but it might be > best to keep the original logic, e.g. initialize `count` to 0 and here > do: > > return wchan_info->count++ < 16; > >> + >> unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p) >> { >> - struct stackframe frame; >> - unsigned long stack_page, ret = 0; >> - int count = 0; >> + unsigned long stack_page; >> + struct wchan_info wchan_info; >> + >> if (!p || p == current || task_is_running(p)) >> return 0; >> >> @@ -556,20 +573,12 @@ unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p) >> if (!stack_page) >> return 0; >> >> - start_backtrace(&frame, thread_saved_fp(p), thread_saved_pc(p)); >> + wchan_info.pc = 0; >> + wchan_info.count = 16; >> + arch_stack_walk(get_wchan_cb, &wchan_info, p, NULL); >> >> - do { >> - if (unwind_frame(p, &frame)) >> - goto out; >> - if (!in_sched_functions(frame.pc)) { >> - ret = frame.pc; >> - goto out; >> - } >> - } while (count++ < 16); >> - >> -out: >> put_task_stack(p); >> - return ret; >> + return wchan_info.pc; >> } > > Other than the comment above, this looks good to me. > >> unsigned long arch_align_stack(unsigned long sp) >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c >> index a6d18755652f..92a0f4d434e4 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c >> @@ -35,15 +35,11 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(save_return_addr); >> void *return_address(unsigned int level) >> {> struct return_address_data data; >> - struct stackframe frame; >> >> data.level = level + 2; >> data.addr = NULL; >> >> - start_backtrace(&frame, >> - (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0), >> - (unsigned long)return_address); >> - walk_stackframe(current, &frame, save_return_addr, &data); >> + arch_stack_walk(save_return_addr, &data, current, NULL); >> >> if (!data.level) >> return data.addr; > > Nor that arch_stack_walk() will start with it's caller, so > return_address() will be included in the trace where it wasn't > previously, which implies we need to skip an additional level. > > That said, I'm not entirely sure why we need to skip 2 levels today; it > might be worth checking that's correct. > > We should also mark return_address() as noinline to avoid surprises with > LTO. > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c >> index 8982a2b78acf..1800310f92be 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c >> @@ -151,23 +151,21 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame, >> } >> NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(walk_stackframe); >> >> -static void dump_backtrace_entry(unsigned long where, const char *loglvl) >> +static bool dump_backtrace_entry(void *arg, unsigned long where) >> { >> + char *loglvl = arg; >> printk("%s %pSb\n", loglvl, (void *)where); >> + return true; >> } >> >> void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk, >> const char *loglvl) >> { >> - struct stackframe frame; >> - int skip = 0; >> - >> pr_debug("%s(regs = %p tsk = %p)\n", __func__, regs, tsk); >> >> if (regs) { >> if (user_mode(regs)) >> return; >> - skip = 1; >> } > > We can simplifiy this to: > > if (regs && user_mode(regs)) > return; > >> >> if (!tsk) >> @@ -176,36 +174,8 @@ void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk, >> if (!try_get_task_stack(tsk)) >> return; >> >> - if (tsk == current) { >> - start_backtrace(&frame, >> - (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0), >> - (unsigned long)dump_backtrace); >> - } else { >> - /* >> - * task blocked in __switch_to >> - */ >> - start_backtrace(&frame, >> - thread_saved_fp(tsk), >> - thread_saved_pc(tsk)); >> - } >> - >> printk("%sCall trace:\n", loglvl); >> - do { >> - /* skip until specified stack frame */ >> - if (!skip) { >> - dump_backtrace_entry(frame.pc, loglvl); >> - } else if (frame.fp == regs->regs[29]) { >> - skip = 0; >> - /* >> - * Mostly, this is the case where this function is >> - * called in panic/abort. As exception handler's >> - * stack frame does not contain the corresponding pc >> - * at which an exception has taken place, use regs->pc >> - * instead. >> - */ >> - dump_backtrace_entry(regs->pc, loglvl); >> - } >> - } while (!unwind_frame(tsk, &frame)); >> + arch_stack_walk(dump_backtrace_entry, (void *)loglvl, tsk, regs); > > It turns out we currently need this skipping to get the balance the > ftrace call stack, and arch_stack_walk() doesn't currently do the right > thing when starting from regs. That balancing isn't quite right, and > will be wrong in some case when unwinding across exception boundaries; > we could implement HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RET_ADDR_PTR using the FP to > solve that. > Hi Mark, It seems that the behavior is the same in the old and new code. Do you agree? In the old code when regs is used, the stack trace starts from regs->regs[29] and the first PC displayed is regs->pc. arch_stack_walk() does the same thing. Can you elaborate what change you want me to make here? Madhavan
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h index 8aebc00c1718..e43dea1c6b41 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h @@ -61,9 +61,6 @@ struct stackframe { #endif }; -extern int unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame); -extern void walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame, - bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *data); extern void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk, const char *loglvl); diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c index 4a72c2727309..2f289013c9c9 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c @@ -147,15 +147,12 @@ static bool callchain_trace(void *data, unsigned long pc) void perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *regs) { - struct stackframe frame; - if (perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->is_in_guest()) { /* We don't support guest os callchain now */ return; } - start_backtrace(&frame, regs->regs[29], regs->pc); - walk_stackframe(current, &frame, callchain_trace, entry); + arch_stack_walk(callchain_trace, entry, current, regs); } unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c index c8989b999250..52c12fd26407 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c @@ -544,11 +544,28 @@ __notrace_funcgraph struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev, return last; } +struct wchan_info { + unsigned long pc; + int count; +}; + +static bool get_wchan_cb(void *arg, unsigned long pc) +{ + struct wchan_info *wchan_info = arg; + + if (!in_sched_functions(pc)) { + wchan_info->pc = pc; + return false; + } + wchan_info->count--; + return !!wchan_info->count; +} + unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p) { - struct stackframe frame; - unsigned long stack_page, ret = 0; - int count = 0; + unsigned long stack_page; + struct wchan_info wchan_info; + if (!p || p == current || task_is_running(p)) return 0; @@ -556,20 +573,12 @@ unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p) if (!stack_page) return 0; - start_backtrace(&frame, thread_saved_fp(p), thread_saved_pc(p)); + wchan_info.pc = 0; + wchan_info.count = 16; + arch_stack_walk(get_wchan_cb, &wchan_info, p, NULL); - do { - if (unwind_frame(p, &frame)) - goto out; - if (!in_sched_functions(frame.pc)) { - ret = frame.pc; - goto out; - } - } while (count++ < 16); - -out: put_task_stack(p); - return ret; + return wchan_info.pc; } unsigned long arch_align_stack(unsigned long sp) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c index a6d18755652f..92a0f4d434e4 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c @@ -35,15 +35,11 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(save_return_addr); void *return_address(unsigned int level) { struct return_address_data data; - struct stackframe frame; data.level = level + 2; data.addr = NULL; - start_backtrace(&frame, - (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0), - (unsigned long)return_address); - walk_stackframe(current, &frame, save_return_addr, &data); + arch_stack_walk(save_return_addr, &data, current, NULL); if (!data.level) return data.addr; diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c index 8982a2b78acf..1800310f92be 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c @@ -151,23 +151,21 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame, } NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(walk_stackframe); -static void dump_backtrace_entry(unsigned long where, const char *loglvl) +static bool dump_backtrace_entry(void *arg, unsigned long where) { + char *loglvl = arg; printk("%s %pSb\n", loglvl, (void *)where); + return true; } void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk, const char *loglvl) { - struct stackframe frame; - int skip = 0; - pr_debug("%s(regs = %p tsk = %p)\n", __func__, regs, tsk); if (regs) { if (user_mode(regs)) return; - skip = 1; } if (!tsk) @@ -176,36 +174,8 @@ void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk, if (!try_get_task_stack(tsk)) return; - if (tsk == current) { - start_backtrace(&frame, - (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0), - (unsigned long)dump_backtrace); - } else { - /* - * task blocked in __switch_to - */ - start_backtrace(&frame, - thread_saved_fp(tsk), - thread_saved_pc(tsk)); - } - printk("%sCall trace:\n", loglvl); - do { - /* skip until specified stack frame */ - if (!skip) { - dump_backtrace_entry(frame.pc, loglvl); - } else if (frame.fp == regs->regs[29]) { - skip = 0; - /* - * Mostly, this is the case where this function is - * called in panic/abort. As exception handler's - * stack frame does not contain the corresponding pc - * at which an exception has taken place, use regs->pc - * instead. - */ - dump_backtrace_entry(regs->pc, loglvl); - } - } while (!unwind_frame(tsk, &frame)); + arch_stack_walk(dump_backtrace_entry, (void *)loglvl, tsk, regs); put_task_stack(tsk); } diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c index eebbc8d7123e..671b3038a772 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c @@ -32,22 +32,26 @@ #include <asm/stacktrace.h> #include <asm/paravirt.h> +static bool profile_pc_cb(void *arg, unsigned long pc) +{ + unsigned long *prof_pc = arg; + + if (in_lock_functions(pc)) + return true; + *prof_pc = pc; + return false; +} + unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs) { - struct stackframe frame; + unsigned long prof_pc = 0; if (!in_lock_functions(regs->pc)) return regs->pc; - start_backtrace(&frame, regs->regs[29], regs->pc); - - do { - int ret = unwind_frame(NULL, &frame); - if (ret < 0) - return 0; - } while (in_lock_functions(frame.pc)); + arch_stack_walk(profile_pc_cb, &prof_pc, current, regs); - return frame.pc; + return prof_pc; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(profile_pc);