From patchwork Thu Aug 12 19:06:01 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" X-Patchwork-Id: 12434079 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B66C4338F for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:09:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5822F60C3F for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:09:20 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 5822F60C3F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=+6si+JbyH74LewGqyqIzgLKh6pAbydcUXUDQizXOXHQ=; b=wCh5rq+hkDj2CQ n+OyIwmb6uD6p3iJCxhV6pWIf5y4PkDgzfCsBK5+ZS2aQaMZ+DkoU1UQ7f7f5SdnhtxPZCpF7Bh+U EE2GvAc/EdMplxcRN1vTqB9nEceNtEgH8sm4Y1iC16jFoi66CVBE0Sgmfz+8m/NBaa8JKvlGA5t1L GBpw+UWxNR8JpnLqcGrbGteHU5CztXTr7cHkTBSzbiJyMEZs5i2oDh+5wkdMMJV85oievi2cWKkUw GudH8QqgRW4MQNQxAWaJPKZef3YelKLYCspIJnG0ZOR9jFlf22G9kQg/s9YOdWXY7bOgoYrQJRRU+ jxPWA6s9igUkeK0QasrA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mEG2U-00AzKk-2V; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:06:50 +0000 Received: from linux.microsoft.com ([13.77.154.182]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mEG1w-00AzAI-7R for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:06:18 +0000 Received: from x64host.home (unknown [47.187.212.181]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E904B209C3BB; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 12:06:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com E904B209C3BB DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1628795175; bh=A0Iq4hB4rYFGIumW8LpdP2LbJpF1RNqiSB5aZK65wpo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dHIuJfEygbSqqJU5bjEJ2+f552tw2jZDF0wZNWMMdMQFhXdXj8BMT6AoGMlgjF7IW X4YkY5QXMkHfjM7CsALIhMCtwtvU09kAGJh3PMBtz3qLGUTfAvS5GQ3VWHP+AwmkAC ppjpxXoHpuM5zbB31i8ZirBOJIlqIoIfizgekioE= From: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com To: mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com, sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, jthierry@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com Subject: [RFC PATCH v8 2/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder code for better consistency and maintenance Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 14:06:01 -0500 Message-Id: <20210812190603.25326-3-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210812190603.25326-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> References: <20210812190603.25326-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210812_120616_348785_9902345F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 29.47 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" Renaming of unwinder functions ============================== Rename unwinder functions to unwind_*() similar to other architectures for naming consistency. More on this below. unwind function attributes ========================== Mark all of the unwind_*() functions with notrace so they cannot be ftraced and NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() so they cannot be kprobed. Ftrace and Kprobe code can call the unwinder. start_backtrace() ================= start_backtrace() is only called by arch_stack_walk(). Make it static. Rename start_backtrace() to unwind_start() for naming consistency. unwind_frame() ============== Rename this to unwind_next() for naming consistency. Replace walk_stackframe() with unwind() ======================================= walk_stackframe() contains the unwinder loop that walks the stack frames. Currently, start_backtrace() and walk_stackframe() are called separately. They should be combined in the same function. Also, the loop in walk_stackframe() should be simplified and should look like the unwind loops in other architectures such as X86 and S390. Remove walk_stackframe(). Define a new function called "unwind()" in its place. Define the following unwinder loop: unwind_start(&frame, task, fp, pc); while (unwind_consume(&frame, consume_entry, cookie)) unwind_next(&frame); return !unwind_failed(&frame); unwind_start() Same as the original start_backtrace(). unwind_consume() This is a new function that calls the callback function to consume the PC in a stackframe. Do it this way so that checks can be performed before and after the callback to determine whether the unwind should continue or terminate. unwind_next() Same as the original unwind_frame() except for two things: - the stack trace termination check has been moved from here to unwind_consume(). So, unwind_next() is always called on a valid fp. - unwind_frame() used to return an error value. This function does not return anything. unwind_failed() Return a boolean to indicate if the stack trace completed successfully or failed. arch_stack_walk() ignores the return value. But arch_stack_walk_reliable() in the future will look at the return value. Unwind status ============= Introduce a new flag called "failed" in struct stackframe. unwind_next() and unwind_consume() will set this flag when an error is encountered and unwind_consume() will check this flag. This is in keeping with other architectures. The failed flags is accessed via the helper unwind_failed(). Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman --- arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 9 +- arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 145 ++++++++++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h index e43dea1c6b41..407007376e97 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ struct stack_info { * A snapshot of a frame record or fp/lr register values, along with some * accounting information necessary for robust unwinding. * + * @task: The task whose stack is being unwound. + * * @fp: The fp value in the frame record (or the real fp) * @pc: The lr value in the frame record (or the real lr) * @@ -49,8 +51,11 @@ struct stack_info { * * @graph: When FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER is selected, holds the index of a * replacement lr value in the ftrace graph stack. + * + * @failed: Unwind failed. */ struct stackframe { + struct task_struct *task; unsigned long fp; unsigned long pc; DECLARE_BITMAP(stacks_done, __NR_STACK_TYPES); @@ -59,6 +64,7 @@ struct stackframe { #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER int graph; #endif + bool failed; }; extern void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk, @@ -145,7 +151,4 @@ static inline bool on_accessible_stack(const struct task_struct *tsk, return false; } -void start_backtrace(struct stackframe *frame, unsigned long fp, - unsigned long pc); - #endif /* __ASM_STACKTRACE_H */ diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c index 1800310f92be..ec8f5163c4d0 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c @@ -32,10 +32,11 @@ * add sp, sp, #0x10 */ - -void start_backtrace(struct stackframe *frame, unsigned long fp, - unsigned long pc) +static void notrace unwind_start(struct stackframe *frame, + struct task_struct *task, + unsigned long fp, unsigned long pc) { + frame->task = task; frame->fp = fp; frame->pc = pc; #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER @@ -45,7 +46,7 @@ void start_backtrace(struct stackframe *frame, unsigned long fp, /* * Prime the first unwind. * - * In unwind_frame() we'll check that the FP points to a valid stack, + * In unwind_next() we'll check that the FP points to a valid stack, * which can't be STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN, and the first unwind will be * treated as a transition to whichever stack that happens to be. The * prev_fp value won't be used, but we set it to 0 such that it is @@ -54,8 +55,11 @@ void start_backtrace(struct stackframe *frame, unsigned long fp, bitmap_zero(frame->stacks_done, __NR_STACK_TYPES); frame->prev_fp = 0; frame->prev_type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN; + frame->failed = false; } +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_start); + /* * Unwind from one frame record (A) to the next frame record (B). * @@ -63,26 +67,26 @@ void start_backtrace(struct stackframe *frame, unsigned long fp, * records (e.g. a cycle), determined based on the location and fp value of A * and the location (but not the fp value) of B. */ -int notrace unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame) +static void notrace unwind_next(struct stackframe *frame) { unsigned long fp = frame->fp; struct stack_info info; + struct task_struct *tsk = frame->task; - if (!tsk) - tsk = current; - - /* Final frame; nothing to unwind */ - if (fp == (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(tsk)->stackframe) - return -ENOENT; - - if (fp & 0x7) - return -EINVAL; + if (fp & 0x7) { + frame->failed = true; + return; + } - if (!on_accessible_stack(tsk, fp, 16, &info)) - return -EINVAL; + if (!on_accessible_stack(tsk, fp, 16, &info)) { + frame->failed = true; + return; + } - if (test_bit(info.type, frame->stacks_done)) - return -EINVAL; + if (test_bit(info.type, frame->stacks_done)) { + frame->failed = true; + return; + } /* * As stacks grow downward, any valid record on the same stack must be @@ -98,15 +102,17 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame) * stack. */ if (info.type == frame->prev_type) { - if (fp <= frame->prev_fp) - return -EINVAL; + if (fp <= frame->prev_fp) { + frame->failed = true; + return; + } } else { set_bit(frame->prev_type, frame->stacks_done); } /* * Record this frame record's values and location. The prev_fp and - * prev_type are only meaningful to the next unwind_frame() invocation. + * prev_type are only meaningful to the next unwind_next() invocation. */ frame->fp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp)); frame->pc = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 8)); @@ -124,32 +130,18 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame) * So replace it to an original value. */ ret_stack = ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack(tsk, frame->graph++); - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ret_stack)) - return -EINVAL; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ret_stack)) { + frame->failed = true; + return; + } frame->pc = ret_stack->ret; } #endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER */ frame->pc = ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(frame->pc); - - return 0; } -NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_frame); -void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame, - bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *data) -{ - while (1) { - int ret; - - if (!fn(data, frame->pc)) - break; - ret = unwind_frame(tsk, frame); - if (ret < 0) - break; - } -} -NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(walk_stackframe); +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next); static bool dump_backtrace_entry(void *arg, unsigned long where) { @@ -186,25 +178,74 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *sp, const char *loglvl) barrier(); } +static bool notrace unwind_consume(struct stackframe *frame, + stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, + void *cookie) +{ + if (frame->failed) { + /* PC is suspect. Cannot consume it. */ + return false; + } + + if (!consume_entry(cookie, frame->pc)) { + /* Caller terminated the unwind. */ + frame->failed = true; + return false; + } + + if (frame->fp == (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(frame->task)->stackframe) { + /* Final frame; nothing to unwind */ + return false; + } + return true; +} + +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_consume); + +static inline bool unwind_failed(struct stackframe *frame) +{ + return frame->failed; +} + +/* Core unwind function */ +static bool notrace unwind(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, void *cookie, + struct task_struct *task, + unsigned long fp, unsigned long pc) +{ + struct stackframe frame; + + unwind_start(&frame, task, fp, pc); + while (unwind_consume(&frame, consume_entry, cookie)) + unwind_next(&frame); + return !unwind_failed(&frame); +} + +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind); + #ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE noinline notrace void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, void *cookie, struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs) { - struct stackframe frame; + unsigned long fp, pc; + + if (!task) + task = current; - if (regs) - start_backtrace(&frame, regs->regs[29], regs->pc); - else if (task == current) - start_backtrace(&frame, - (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(1), - (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0)); - else - start_backtrace(&frame, thread_saved_fp(task), - thread_saved_pc(task)); - - walk_stackframe(task, &frame, consume_entry, cookie); + if (regs) { + fp = regs->regs[29]; + pc = regs->pc; + } else if (task == current) { + /* Skip arch_stack_walk() in the stack trace. */ + fp = (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(1); + pc = (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0); + } else { + /* Caller guarantees that the task is not running. */ + fp = thread_saved_fp(task); + pc = thread_saved_pc(task); + } + unwind(consume_entry, cookie, task, fp, pc); } #endif