From patchwork Tue Aug 17 07:45:49 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?b?U2FtIFNoaWggKOWPsueiqeS4iSk=?= X-Patchwork-Id: 12440653 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE8FC4338F for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 07:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E069860F41 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 07:49:13 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org E069860F41 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=mediatek.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=J9hGq/ZvkDsIQEK10lvmCtuA27Dkz4UGOnwkM/XALX8=; b=YpetlRGtJWHD01 +zhFOl3CEqxvUlbZ0XRkQB1jQy0WNNYkzj1DQ3W9XZwR+RKarcYDRlbfIbcsplqnYfKetnSH6qeLW 6ROVrV/qvGzH1AvaIUOTQF7ZvXJgIVCALt+72nOGmL8QoGEW/jGWj9TSdinX06ME1h2tFzP7hH3dn bOkH/pq+NXBKHFfIZIoGSAuQkGKz9YHyBocZvsx3pSnRsEAkiS0MXi9DJ/OyaUHQDKD5Kq3zipTiJ nDYoKd5e9ORUml2pwCjko7HfqLl25zfgn5MLXPPnj3DV5nXuuaKtiIB5cFBKay5RIwaoSBqrDIthL b5Gzq9Xa7gzrmyDNmUDg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mFtod-001N5V-8P; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 07:47:20 +0000 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.184]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mFtni-001Mj1-NI; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 07:46:26 +0000 X-UUID: 2d2ee88d6a754eeda5b2d085c881a59d-20210817 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediatek.com; s=dk; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From; bh=jk2QdYseHr/V/ml/bA5dPvQWjAD0BWvQ6VCMkpb/3Hg=; b=HKM060nV8y87LlwImWcaT4jVWc3+0HMRNw+/e4/2ZVyCH1jC0gkL/ciVWuq2D7ucKHlhA4mkuaLHiNOXlWGBI+oRzQLtKtMHQPLQVELV9EhHbj1oOnUR3pnZWYanw+OQMmzaHneV6wYWjfDfRGAyYop5s766BXFH4c7ohIIjjg0=; X-UUID: 2d2ee88d6a754eeda5b2d085c881a59d-20210817 Received: from mtkcas66.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.44)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 2020454158; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 00:46:21 -0700 Received: from mtkmbs10n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.34) by MTKMBS62N2.mediatek.inc (172.29.193.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 00:46:19 -0700 Received: from mtkcas11.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.40) by mtkmbs10n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:46:18 +0800 Received: from mtksdccf07.mediatek.inc (172.21.84.99) by mtkcas11.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:46:18 +0800 From: Sam Shih To: Rob Herring , Sean Wang , "Linus Walleij" , Matthias Brugger , Matt Mackall , Herbert Xu , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Wim Van Sebroeck , Guenter Roeck , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Hsin-Yi Wang , Enric Balletbo i Serra , Fabien Parent , Seiya Wang , , , , , , , , , CC: John Crispin , Ryder Lee , "Sam Shih" Subject: [v2, 04/12] pinctrl: mediatek: moore: check if pin_desc is valid before use Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:45:49 +0800 Message-ID: <20210817074557.30953-5-sam.shih@mediatek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.18.0 In-Reply-To: <20210817074557.30953-1-sam.shih@mediatek.com> References: <20210817074557.30953-1-sam.shih@mediatek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210817_004622_798493_05345A97 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.19 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Certain SoC are missing the middle part gpios in consecutive pins, it's better to check if mtk_pin_desc is a valid pin for the extensibility Signed-off-by: Sam Shih --- v2: applied the comment suggested by reviewers: - for the pins not ballout, we can fill .name in struct mtk_pin_desc as NULL and return -ENOTSUPP in gpio/pinconf ops. --- drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c index 3a4a23c40a71..ad3b67163973 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c @@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ static int mtk_pinmux_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, int pin = grp->pins[i]; desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[pin]; + if (!desc->name) + return -ENOTSUPP; mtk_hw_set_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_MODE, pin_modes[i]); @@ -76,6 +78,8 @@ static int mtk_pinmux_gpio_request_enable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc; desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[pin]; + if (!desc->name) + return -ENOTSUPP; return mtk_hw_set_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_MODE, hw->soc->gpio_m); @@ -89,6 +93,8 @@ static int mtk_pinmux_gpio_set_direction(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc; desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[pin]; + if (!desc->name) + return -ENOTSUPP; /* hardware would take 0 as input direction */ return mtk_hw_set_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DIR, !input); @@ -103,6 +109,8 @@ static int mtk_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc; desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[pin]; + if (!desc->name) + return -ENOTSUPP; switch (param) { case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE: @@ -218,6 +226,8 @@ static int mtk_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin, int cfg, err = 0; desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[pin]; + if (!desc->name) + return -ENOTSUPP; for (cfg = 0; cfg < num_configs; cfg++) { param = pinconf_to_config_param(configs[cfg]); @@ -435,6 +445,8 @@ static int mtk_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio) int value, err; desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[gpio]; + if (!desc->name) + return -ENOTSUPP; err = mtk_hw_get_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DI, &value); if (err) @@ -449,6 +461,10 @@ static void mtk_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio, int value) const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc; desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[gpio]; + if (!desc->name) { + dev_err(hw->dev, "Failed to set gpio %d\n", gpio); + return; + } mtk_hw_set_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DO, !!value); } @@ -490,6 +506,8 @@ static int mtk_gpio_set_config(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset, u32 debounce; desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[offset]; + if (!desc->name) + return -ENOTSUPP; if (!hw->eint || pinconf_to_config_param(config) != PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_DEBOUNCE ||