From patchwork Mon Dec 6 17:02:20 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Alexandru Elisei X-Patchwork-Id: 12694937 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5906AC4321E for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 17:07:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=PIXFXELGPmon+MwZj7updzw0l9WPSys4BNUbjdwgBHM=; b=2tBvtgMuhqYpVj TQaSxvE9Hx1pxBIPclVVYxc9v0ji1cGuLu9UoS6+KgMjh3ieyniJq18Wz5kyo85yqGnPD0P8mrZHU eLztWaLLFqaME4y/e6rOpNxQHHHK2ybtmlL/HW4sSS/KgmKZJv7i7zG5YfgPLPYdRCe8mriQIHDHs oMfJmEotUrFbAbMSiiMhOOoWZEp5YkOSuqio4ApWTFED/jriy36xJqxOm+QXGNKd2Hl9ZRWi5vV0w PbF/yEc9JxGoi1Ew7bE3k7PAwabh6+dVE42rp0Txugd+JE+LIMRsJd0B/uV6D1S1VuUeNig7MMaHV N7Xb86dYCLQeotuDKOOg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1muHR7-004y6r-Fi; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 17:05:57 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1muHNs-004wml-GD for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 17:02:37 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF5812FC; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 09:02:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from monolith.localdoman (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DDB5B3F73B; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 09:02:33 -0800 (PST) From: Alexandru Elisei To: maz@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] perf: Fix wrong name in comment for struct perf_cpu_context Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 17:02:20 +0000 Message-Id: <20211206170223.309789-2-alexandru.elisei@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20211206170223.309789-1-alexandru.elisei@arm.com> References: <20211206170223.309789-1-alexandru.elisei@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211206_090236_616881_6931CE3E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.00 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Commit 0793a61d4df8 ("performance counters: core code") added the perf subsystem (then called Performance Counters) to Linux, creating the struct perf_cpu_context. The comment for the struct referred to it as a "struct perf_counter_cpu_context". Commit cdd6c482c9ff ("perf: Do the big rename: Performance Counters -> Performance Events") changed the comment to refer to a "struct perf_event_cpu_context", which was still the wrong name for the struct. Change the comment to say "struct perf_cpu_context". CC: Thomas Gleixner CC: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei --- include/linux/perf_event.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h index 0dcfd265beed..14132570ea5d 100644 --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h @@ -862,7 +862,7 @@ struct perf_event_context { #define PERF_NR_CONTEXTS 4 /** - * struct perf_event_cpu_context - per cpu event context structure + * struct perf_cpu_context - per cpu event context structure */ struct perf_cpu_context { struct perf_event_context ctx;