From patchwork Tue Feb 8 08:18:53 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yu Zhao X-Patchwork-Id: 12738394 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE661C433EF for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2022 09:31:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:From:Subject:References: Mime-Version:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=M1uTjmDdx6AhQrGPleGhWWyN6K2zEabRvtey5LGTNdY=; b=1w9WcGmuBlyjajayXUsk9Ymj2Q sDfK5YZBb9GcghpgAVKaj+sAdp2ix4nvqjG/CND6dWYpvBjp1wEjumsBrknoioshY9H71k1x0786/ 6/or2lYPO41DjdUgYOieHK3XPNx+EAsSVeMa1tMiVwT+YBl4MmiAPWn6ASMkoHqJWG9KfZiZEqOYP 2wh7BrqfaQtnbaSGVTOd0HSGrhzrMdEncnIVLh9YwYXzij8fLGvHcwUZ3+yLJAahYnIIx/P0iFHgv LjZqQBI/tSf8Ya79XuXsKCYudrH1wpP5faPU9hbD5icveKzgYrbvM8Wb9lwOyILWuKCd3yhw+ehoV Bme6WPeQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nHMpU-00DEgu-2K; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 09:30:32 +0000 Received: from mail-io1-xd4a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d4a]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nHLin-00Ctrs-O4 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 08:19:36 +0000 Received: by mail-io1-xd4a.google.com with SMTP id k20-20020a5d91d4000000b0061299fad2fdso10864184ior.21 for ; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 00:19:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nZedsI14s3V7shToTSZ5wS90MR6Uq3bP9RK0VBc9pM0=; b=qzt/m74UvXlhewwQ7oRVgOmqsV4cMauzgDfQ8398zF9KHGUlIv/NuygfZIwvKq65iv 0gECfRaEVcw3lDIiDL3/C11Go+smIYjMHolSaqgGUjPeP3G7f/n/Uwu4/Q/9bFXLLat6 Jr0q5+0MRtymhqjcNoGpUlBCM+imvqxsoJ1XtyRKmsep+53FA8z7JVDE2h4yDPWYaxvR u82iDbzM5ipH74BY4UmGissTkWpnp0Y6xN/XQ1UoZjRbF5JLecGSaGTtIhVohWmpEZZD oFz/kVVIh9xn5d91OMHqwDNU1eZiWP39QRxVpj2zagJOnDGB8n19XCaLfaUz9/qo21L+ TIRQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nZedsI14s3V7shToTSZ5wS90MR6Uq3bP9RK0VBc9pM0=; b=AdlEBvfzUFmiqD1xvH4CkIijyn+oy1eqPZ8GVpLHiLyNl9ma4pUi8LxLUVeh/jQ1s0 UyOc/rj2IJ90Wyd6OdwbomhavW8Z74b+vNZAWtc8JWZJ18Vf+z2nDMTXxpndzrnz2LYI oMXLG4HmxM0O2yypsx2te95SNHpfj/WMnUx9LAhZOOEu4jYhj3JkVnfz/taeGiGNbSpk zgRH7R+TGxDE+5n3rJcnRfoPXwazfho5L00S/ItqrGB3LKMOvTPgN7PFn9FcEP8pVbCE lS14qQelXQn3kjlx+1mmoAhG2yzpyJJIU5bijmbz0/Z7V8kZLaeg6BvQf/JkKCYLUJNT ogVw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531PSV95Ik5U7fbxVIgB4UqD0kMkRNUBUMLrDv9tYv9rLwAXjZUk mU/o5574oxEygFE8NES2eFeDJA0K/1U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzviVvsPV6/r3chYPkbDbXAI7qPreQ0Vfx54wnECEkxXyGos5wsROVRSZRvcnIKgMRSVW9hg1dbJQ= X-Received: from yuzhao.bld.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:183:200:5f31:19c3:21f5:7300]) (user=yuzhao job=sendgmr) by 2002:a92:1a49:: with SMTP id z9mr1768424ill.292.1644308371158; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 00:19:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 01:18:53 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20220208081902.3550911-1-yuzhao@google.com> Message-Id: <20220208081902.3550911-4-yuzhao@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20220208081902.3550911-1-yuzhao@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.0.263.gb82422642f-goog Subject: [PATCH v7 03/12] mm/vmscan.c: refactor shrink_node() From: Yu Zhao To: Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , Mel Gorman , Michal Hocko Cc: Andi Kleen , Aneesh Kumar , Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>, Catalin Marinas , Dave Hansen , Hillf Danton , Jens Axboe , Jesse Barnes , Jonathan Corbet , Linus Torvalds , Matthew Wilcox , Michael Larabel , Mike Rapoport , Rik van Riel , Vlastimil Babka , Will Deacon , Ying Huang , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, page-reclaim@google.com, x86@kernel.org, Yu Zhao , Brian Geffon , Jan Alexander Steffens , Oleksandr Natalenko , Steven Barrett , Suleiman Souhlal , Daniel Byrne , Donald Carr , " =?utf-8?q?Holger_Hoffst=C3=A4tte?= " , Konstantin Kharlamov , Shuang Zhai , Sofia Trinh X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220208_001933_812042_EAC42404 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.58 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org This patch refactors shrink_node() to improve readability for the upcoming changes to mm/vmscan.c. Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao Acked-by: Brian Geffon Acked-by: Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) Acked-by: Oleksandr Natalenko Acked-by: Steven Barrett Acked-by: Suleiman Souhlal Tested-by: Daniel Byrne Tested-by: Donald Carr Tested-by: Holger Hoffstätte Tested-by: Konstantin Kharlamov Tested-by: Shuang Zhai Tested-by: Sofia Trinh --- mm/vmscan.c | 198 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 090bfb605ecf..b7228b73e1b3 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -2716,6 +2716,109 @@ enum scan_balance { SCAN_FILE, }; +static void prepare_scan_count(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc) +{ + unsigned long file; + struct lruvec *target_lruvec; + + target_lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(sc->target_mem_cgroup, pgdat); + + /* + * Flush the memory cgroup stats, so that we read accurate per-memcg + * lruvec stats for heuristics. + */ + mem_cgroup_flush_stats(); + + /* + * Determine the scan balance between anon and file LRUs. + */ + spin_lock_irq(&target_lruvec->lru_lock); + sc->anon_cost = target_lruvec->anon_cost; + sc->file_cost = target_lruvec->file_cost; + spin_unlock_irq(&target_lruvec->lru_lock); + + /* + * Target desirable inactive:active list ratios for the anon + * and file LRU lists. + */ + if (!sc->force_deactivate) { + unsigned long refaults; + + refaults = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec, + WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_ANON); + if (refaults != target_lruvec->refaults[0] || + inactive_is_low(target_lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON)) + sc->may_deactivate |= DEACTIVATE_ANON; + else + sc->may_deactivate &= ~DEACTIVATE_ANON; + + /* + * When refaults are being observed, it means a new + * workingset is being established. Deactivate to get + * rid of any stale active pages quickly. + */ + refaults = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec, + WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_FILE); + if (refaults != target_lruvec->refaults[1] || + inactive_is_low(target_lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE)) + sc->may_deactivate |= DEACTIVATE_FILE; + else + sc->may_deactivate &= ~DEACTIVATE_FILE; + } else + sc->may_deactivate = DEACTIVATE_ANON | DEACTIVATE_FILE; + + /* + * If we have plenty of inactive file pages that aren't + * thrashing, try to reclaim those first before touching + * anonymous pages. + */ + file = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec, NR_INACTIVE_FILE); + if (file >> sc->priority && !(sc->may_deactivate & DEACTIVATE_FILE)) + sc->cache_trim_mode = 1; + else + sc->cache_trim_mode = 0; + + /* + * Prevent the reclaimer from falling into the cache trap: as + * cache pages start out inactive, every cache fault will tip + * the scan balance towards the file LRU. And as the file LRU + * shrinks, so does the window for rotation from references. + * This means we have a runaway feedback loop where a tiny + * thrashing file LRU becomes infinitely more attractive than + * anon pages. Try to detect this based on file LRU size. + */ + if (!cgroup_reclaim(sc)) { + unsigned long total_high_wmark = 0; + unsigned long free, anon; + int z; + + free = sum_zone_node_page_state(pgdat->node_id, NR_FREE_PAGES); + file = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_ACTIVE_FILE) + + node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_FILE); + + for (z = 0; z < MAX_NR_ZONES; z++) { + struct zone *zone = &pgdat->node_zones[z]; + + if (!managed_zone(zone)) + continue; + + total_high_wmark += high_wmark_pages(zone); + } + + /* + * Consider anon: if that's low too, this isn't a + * runaway file reclaim problem, but rather just + * extreme pressure. Reclaim as per usual then. + */ + anon = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_ANON); + + sc->file_is_tiny = + file + free <= total_high_wmark && + !(sc->may_deactivate & DEACTIVATE_ANON) && + anon >> sc->priority; + } +} + /* * Determine how aggressively the anon and file LRU lists should be * scanned. The relative value of each set of LRU lists is determined @@ -3186,109 +3289,16 @@ static void shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc) unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned; struct lruvec *target_lruvec; bool reclaimable = false; - unsigned long file; target_lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(sc->target_mem_cgroup, pgdat); again: - /* - * Flush the memory cgroup stats, so that we read accurate per-memcg - * lruvec stats for heuristics. - */ - mem_cgroup_flush_stats(); - memset(&sc->nr, 0, sizeof(sc->nr)); nr_reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed; nr_scanned = sc->nr_scanned; - /* - * Determine the scan balance between anon and file LRUs. - */ - spin_lock_irq(&target_lruvec->lru_lock); - sc->anon_cost = target_lruvec->anon_cost; - sc->file_cost = target_lruvec->file_cost; - spin_unlock_irq(&target_lruvec->lru_lock); - - /* - * Target desirable inactive:active list ratios for the anon - * and file LRU lists. - */ - if (!sc->force_deactivate) { - unsigned long refaults; - - refaults = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec, - WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_ANON); - if (refaults != target_lruvec->refaults[0] || - inactive_is_low(target_lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON)) - sc->may_deactivate |= DEACTIVATE_ANON; - else - sc->may_deactivate &= ~DEACTIVATE_ANON; - - /* - * When refaults are being observed, it means a new - * workingset is being established. Deactivate to get - * rid of any stale active pages quickly. - */ - refaults = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec, - WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_FILE); - if (refaults != target_lruvec->refaults[1] || - inactive_is_low(target_lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE)) - sc->may_deactivate |= DEACTIVATE_FILE; - else - sc->may_deactivate &= ~DEACTIVATE_FILE; - } else - sc->may_deactivate = DEACTIVATE_ANON | DEACTIVATE_FILE; - - /* - * If we have plenty of inactive file pages that aren't - * thrashing, try to reclaim those first before touching - * anonymous pages. - */ - file = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec, NR_INACTIVE_FILE); - if (file >> sc->priority && !(sc->may_deactivate & DEACTIVATE_FILE)) - sc->cache_trim_mode = 1; - else - sc->cache_trim_mode = 0; - - /* - * Prevent the reclaimer from falling into the cache trap: as - * cache pages start out inactive, every cache fault will tip - * the scan balance towards the file LRU. And as the file LRU - * shrinks, so does the window for rotation from references. - * This means we have a runaway feedback loop where a tiny - * thrashing file LRU becomes infinitely more attractive than - * anon pages. Try to detect this based on file LRU size. - */ - if (!cgroup_reclaim(sc)) { - unsigned long total_high_wmark = 0; - unsigned long free, anon; - int z; - - free = sum_zone_node_page_state(pgdat->node_id, NR_FREE_PAGES); - file = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_ACTIVE_FILE) + - node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_FILE); - - for (z = 0; z < MAX_NR_ZONES; z++) { - struct zone *zone = &pgdat->node_zones[z]; - if (!managed_zone(zone)) - continue; - - total_high_wmark += high_wmark_pages(zone); - } - - /* - * Consider anon: if that's low too, this isn't a - * runaway file reclaim problem, but rather just - * extreme pressure. Reclaim as per usual then. - */ - anon = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_ANON); - - sc->file_is_tiny = - file + free <= total_high_wmark && - !(sc->may_deactivate & DEACTIVATE_ANON) && - anon >> sc->priority; - } + prepare_scan_count(pgdat, sc); shrink_node_memcgs(pgdat, sc);