From patchwork Sun Feb 13 19:58:31 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Cristian Marussi X-Patchwork-Id: 12744673 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40ACDC433EF for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 20:02:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:List-Subscribe:List-Help: List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=7VDO4WrTUiJe0yNznDeBRmv0X/gHygTZrzAcxh7T1Xc=; b=o+WtaIOT5yhIJj iULOBSu7f71unx9KWrAiLfgZoLG/a5pMHMmuNZiA4LOaud3MQgaB+ibHlur1ZwrDcaYSXG/eKqsFB 4CtQw0dmqwL9YrnUdR2z/4uDTv7pXvxZ1VyhmYDlJxM2j8Are3MmSQAFDr2niKO7lcQ5yFZijZOMT c08yvkCoS363PCVte/GToSBHf2tcCUyts65pp/jfxHDtkZ7kCKV49LLb5EB0ErhUWmMfEdb3zSeHR jxWf9z2OUt/40F+0m7fwcj70lJZXImfT/UKKCh7v+1FuijaKdfGUANfXVWPc+4tAXJwplgxd/Wo8V jNnH3BSx8HlaBd257y+w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nJL2s-00CPgK-TI; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 20:00:31 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nJL1b-00CP6H-K6 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 19:59:13 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D0A1063; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 11:59:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from e120937-lin.home (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A64123F70D; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 11:59:09 -0800 (PST) From: Cristian Marussi To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, peter.hilber@opensynergy.com, igor.skalkin@opensynergy.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com Subject: [PATCH v4 7/8] firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for clock_enable_latency Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 19:58:31 +0000 Message-Id: <20220213195832.27932-8-cristian.marussi@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20220213195832.27932-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> References: <20220213195832.27932-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220213_115911_740660_A1DB7904 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.55 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org An SCMI platform can optionally advertise an enable latency typically associated with a specific clock resource: add support for parsing such optional message field and export such information in the usual publicly accessible clock descriptor. Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi --- v1 --> v2 - moved enable_latency flag definition from the previous commit v2 --> v3 - checking for clock_enable_latencty presence, removed RFC tag --- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c | 12 +++++++++--- include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c index 72f930c0e3e2..cf6fed6dec77 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ struct scmi_msg_resp_clock_protocol_attributes { struct scmi_msg_resp_clock_attributes { __le32 attributes; #define CLOCK_ENABLE BIT(0) - u8 name[SCMI_MAX_STR_SIZE]; + u8 name[SCMI_MAX_STR_SIZE]; + __le32 clock_enable_latency; }; struct scmi_clock_set_config { @@ -116,10 +117,15 @@ static int scmi_clock_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, attr = t->rx.buf; ret = ph->xops->do_xfer(ph, t); - if (!ret) + if (!ret) { strlcpy(clk->name, attr->name, SCMI_MAX_STR_SIZE); - else + /* Is optional field clock_enable_latency provided ? */ + if (t->rx.len == sizeof(*attr)) + clk->enable_latency = + le32_to_cpu(attr->clock_enable_latency); + } else { clk->name[0] = '\0'; + } ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, t); return ret; diff --git a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h index 306e576835f8..b87551f41f9f 100644 --- a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h +++ b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ struct scmi_revision_info { struct scmi_clock_info { char name[SCMI_MAX_STR_SIZE]; + unsigned int enable_latency; bool rate_discrete; union { struct {