From patchwork Mon Feb 14 06:57:22 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Reiji Watanabe X-Patchwork-Id: 12745005 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 311E6C433FE for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 07:00:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:From:Subject:References: Mime-Version:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=V0Cvp/0teCd8m281VOrsT07DgOnRM2GsF2Pp7JNMERc=; b=vKYx91O0kkET9eUtdR9j3VETwR CtIck3f2RZX8nuP/3e/RG78ztkcZaMYj4tJyfhjsu0MSlfiuTjiGYVWheA/SDD8xqn2HGI3BpRc6j lFwaEd8zugKACa0TEaKo6gNanShF0Y/0VuNEyIns0rEuSn6KTjj45svT0nN5V3gdzbd88AR9LG+Rd tgqaqD3CJFPgO487eOy3yvBznu8SBamYzwzNJBf8MYKvhAaGvhobJPMhLaBmka3egcPrOd0GIlIEN H5x+MmvZkMJnzN23ExOe2xOb5y7oA0BuOcJz32FopD5iBW8pOBZpKo1ypIaz6pGTCyVLb90uUZZ4f 4Cdc8ILg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nJVKJ-00DWO7-Ja; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 06:59:11 +0000 Received: from mail-pj1-x104a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::104a]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nJVK4-00DWIl-9U for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 06:58:58 +0000 Received: by mail-pj1-x104a.google.com with SMTP id g14-20020a17090a7d0e00b001b8ef9f9545so13320362pjl.0 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 22:58:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=9dgY9RPK0Mzg9PSBfYq2VpOzkE0KrSO3MIogj57mPgI=; b=oeGQWsjqzeH8TXqpnL2Y0KU91kw6toSZK7TJli4iBWYn327KuZPpxx8ZW+KQ1dYvb9 6cIffwiWM0PFrxs8pnXIr/9AKScvH3wtVMLwcBYbp3ArkF/tizIuxGBEN63UKLoPi9HL 7BfZIJQYyeuhqF6CfNdlbebR5PmEngvU1Lc1TuNfoavKFkAMVpmxcldoadVKUshC/8J5 gSvhk6cLjOahX397Mc5RzQquGw1Yx41ngDT8hoKYstFacOZCoiU8Tr3P6adxMaXcyUOm OG2V8ieEdVDeXTCzybZZXlrGw3BmFPWMxk5t60T1SUgoeApZ9q7DA1rKzILeu0veosK2 9sKw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=9dgY9RPK0Mzg9PSBfYq2VpOzkE0KrSO3MIogj57mPgI=; b=p81PjeZjLo8zpD8Nb1UItOu3qwyAu70JKQtJ5jtWEVn1oRcFcNGV5hBojnkI2b06su VrOOigKFmIB02PIVG6qItS63rap+CmDoO9sfrRDeytiqqOUorh3r+mVr0lnWotYbjLbJ INvoouegRYj0NqAybaeAB9y1lFCV5qwkb+QnL9mj4dDUGP06xRkJTUIp7I6VqQ1m2jWH 4KOX5aAeLcIgfmIGnxOgdCa840w0Q7vpKX2h7ij0eyBQYnFg3iybJ2dhCXCqYLBQqEyY qVU/maH2S44Nl4f2HQwLZyTT20MBjeZAc2WLR9z18SCJBofe8CmK6+jtJ+zgHZdOdn3H QrMw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Q8Ba/SY0WAmjRtdPeKv69HXfyp1knjKDncqjK/MBSwcoqGaFk Vy7g/EsNYajArLXWzdk0nEJc7E6I8D4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJysO+rdu0V/2nbjjc7ftxykFod94OtpUlWD1z6SarUJFuLqaUo4t5iPz+Md7TD9fcEN3Tv9OJtECso= X-Received: from reiji-vws-sp.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:3d59]) (user=reijiw job=sendgmr) by 2002:aa7:888f:: with SMTP id z15mr2584612pfe.15.1644821935315; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 22:58:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 22:57:22 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20220214065746.1230608-1-reijiw@google.com> Message-Id: <20220214065746.1230608-4-reijiw@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20220214065746.1230608-1-reijiw@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1.265.g69c8d7142f-goog Subject: [PATCH v5 03/27] KVM: arm64: Introduce struct id_reg_info From: Reiji Watanabe To: Marc Zyngier , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, James Morse , Alexandru Elisei , Suzuki K Poulose , Paolo Bonzini , Will Deacon , Andrew Jones , Fuad Tabba , Peng Liang , Peter Shier , Ricardo Koller , Oliver Upton , Jing Zhang , Raghavendra Rao Anata , Reiji Watanabe X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220213_225856_369656_7BF558E2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 40.01 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org This patch lays the groundwork to make ID registers writable. Introduce struct id_reg_info for an ID register to manage the register specific control of its value for the guest, and provide set of functions commonly used for ID registers to make them writable. The id_reg_info is used to do register specific initialization, validation of the ID register and etc. Not all ID registers must have the id_reg_info. ID registers that don't have the id_reg_info are handled in a common way that is applied to all ID registers. At present, changing an ID register from userspace is allowed only if the ID register has the id_reg_info, but that will be changed by the following patches. No ID register has the structure yet and the following patches will add the id_reg_info for some ID registers. kvm_set_id_reg_feature(), which is introduced in this patch, is going to be used by the following patch outsdie from sys_regs.c when an ID register field needs to be updated. Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe --- arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 1 + arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 280 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 3 files changed, 268 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h index c041e5afe3d2..9ffe6604a58a 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -747,6 +747,7 @@ long kvm_vm_ioctl_mte_copy_tags(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_arm_copy_mte_tags *copy_tags); void set_default_id_regs(struct kvm *kvm); +int kvm_set_id_reg_feature(struct kvm *kvm, u32 id, u8 field_shift, u8 fval); /* Guest/host FPSIMD coordination helpers */ int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h index 898bee0004ae..3f12e7036985 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h @@ -1214,6 +1214,7 @@ #define ICH_VTR_TDS_MASK (1 << ICH_VTR_TDS_SHIFT) #define ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_BITS 4 +#define ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK ((1ull << ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_BITS) - 1) /* Create a mask for the feature bits of the specified feature. */ #define ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(x) (GENMASK_ULL(x##_SHIFT + ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_BITS - 1, x##_SHIFT)) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c index 080908c60fa6..da76516f2aad 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c @@ -265,6 +265,113 @@ static bool trap_raz_wi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, return read_zero(vcpu, p); } +struct id_reg_info { + /* Register ID */ + u32 sys_reg; + + /* + * Limit value of the register for a vcpu. The value is the sanitized + * system value with bits set/cleared for unsupported features for the + * guest. + */ + u64 vcpu_limit_val; + + /* Fields that are not validated by arm64_check_features_kvm. */ + u64 ignore_mask; + + /* An optional initialization function of the id_reg_info */ + void (*init)(struct id_reg_info *id_reg); + + /* + * This is an optional ID register specific validation function. When + * userspace tries to set the ID register, arm64_check_features_kvm() + * will check if the requested value indicates any features that cannot + * be supported by KVM on the host. But, some ID register fields need + * a special checking, and this function can be used for such fields. + * e.g. When SVE is configured for a vCPU by KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT, + * ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE shouldn't be set to 0 for the vCPU. + * The validation function for ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 could be used to check + * the field is consistent with SVE configuration. + */ + int (*validate)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct id_reg_info *id_reg, + u64 val); + + /* + * Return a bitmask of the vCPU's ID register fields that are not + * synced with saved (per VM) ID register value, which usually + * indicates opt-in CPU features that are not configured for the vCPU. + * ID registers are saved per VM, but some opt-in CPU features can + * be configured per vCPU. The saved (per VM) values for such + * features are for vCPUs with the features (and zero for + * vCPUs without the features). + * Return value of this function is used to handle such fields + * for per vCPU ID register read/write request with saved per VM + * ID register. See the __write_id_reg's comment for more detail. + */ + u64 (*vcpu_mask)(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + const struct id_reg_info *id_reg); +}; + +static void id_reg_info_init(struct id_reg_info *id_reg) +{ + u64 val = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id_reg->sys_reg); + + id_reg->vcpu_limit_val = val; + if (id_reg->init) + id_reg->init(id_reg); + + /* + * id_reg->init() might update id_reg->vcpu_limit_val. + * Make sure that id_reg->vcpu_limit_val, which will be the default + * register value for guests, is a safe value to use for guests + * on the host. + */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(arm64_check_features_kvm(id_reg->sys_reg, + id_reg->vcpu_limit_val, val)); +} + +/* + * An ID register that needs special handling to control the value for the + * guest must have its own id_reg_info in id_reg_info_table. + * (i.e. the reset value is different from the host's sanitized value, + * the value is affected by opt-in features, some fields need specific + * validation, etc.) + */ +#define GET_ID_REG_INFO(id) (id_reg_info_table[IDREG_IDX(id)]) +static struct id_reg_info *id_reg_info_table[KVM_ARM_ID_REG_MAX_NUM] = {}; + +static int validate_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 id, u64 val) +{ + const struct id_reg_info *id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(id); + u64 limit, tmp_val; + int err; + + if (id_reg) { + limit = id_reg->vcpu_limit_val; + /* + * Replace the fields that are indicated in ignore_mask with + * the value in the limit to not have arm64_check_features_kvm() + * check the field in @val. + */ + tmp_val = val & ~id_reg->ignore_mask; + tmp_val |= (limit & id_reg->ignore_mask); + } else { + limit = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id); + tmp_val = val; + } + + /* Check if the value indicates any feature that is not in the limit. */ + err = arm64_check_features_kvm(id, tmp_val, limit); + if (err) + return err; + + if (id_reg && id_reg->validate) + /* Run the ID register specific validity check. */ + err = id_reg->validate(vcpu, id_reg, val); + + return err; +} + /* * ARMv8.1 mandates at least a trivial LORegion implementation, where all the * RW registers are RES0 (which we can implement as RAZ/WI). On an ARMv8.0 @@ -1068,9 +1175,91 @@ static bool is_id_reg(u32 id) sys_reg_CRm(id) < 8); } +static u64 read_kvm_id_reg(struct kvm *kvm, u32 id) +{ + return kvm->arch.id_regs[IDREG_IDX(id)]; +} + +static int __modify_kvm_id_reg(struct kvm *kvm, u32 id, u64 val, + u64 preserve_mask) +{ + u64 old, new; + + lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->lock); + + old = kvm->arch.id_regs[IDREG_IDX(id)]; + + /* Preserve the value at the bit position set in preserve_mask */ + new = old & preserve_mask; + new |= (val & ~preserve_mask); + + /* Don't allow to modify ID register value after KVM_RUN on any vCPUs */ + if (kvm->arch.ran_once && new != old) + return -EBUSY; + + WRITE_ONCE(kvm->arch.id_regs[IDREG_IDX(id)], new); + + return 0; +} + +static int modify_kvm_id_reg(struct kvm *kvm, u32 id, u64 val, + u64 preserve_mask) +{ + int ret; + + mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + ret = __modify_kvm_id_reg(kvm, id, val, preserve_mask); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + + return ret; +} + +static int write_kvm_id_reg(struct kvm *kvm, u32 id, u64 val) +{ + return modify_kvm_id_reg(kvm, id, val, 0); +} + +/* + * KVM basically forces all vCPUs of the guest to have a uniform value for + * each ID register (it means KVM_SET_ONE_REG for a vCPU affects all + * the vCPUs of the guest), and the id_regs[] of kvm_arch holds values + * of ID registers for the guest. However, there is an exception for + * ID register fields corresponding to CPU features that can be + * configured per vCPU by KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT, or etc (e.g. PMUv3, SVE, etc). + * For such fields, all vCPUs that have the feature will have a non-zero + * uniform value, which can be updated by userspace, but the vCPUs that + * don't have the feature will have zero for the fields. + * Values that @id_regs holds are for vCPUs that have such features. So, + * to get the ID register value for a vCPU that doesn't have those features, + * the corresponding fields in id_regs[] needs to be cleared. + * A bitmask of the fields are provided by id_reg_info's vcpu_mask(), and + * __write_id_reg() and __read_id_reg() take care of those fields using + * the bitmask. + */ +static int __write_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 id, u64 val) +{ + const struct id_reg_info *id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(id); + u64 mask = 0; + + if (id_reg && id_reg->vcpu_mask) + mask = id_reg->vcpu_mask(vcpu, id_reg); + + /* + * Update the ID register for the guest with @val, except for fields + * that are set in the mask, which indicates fields for opt-in + * features that are not configured for the vCPU. + */ + return modify_kvm_id_reg(vcpu->kvm, id, val, mask); +} + static u64 __read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 id) { - u64 val = vcpu->kvm->arch.id_regs[IDREG_IDX(id)]; + const struct id_reg_info *id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(id); + u64 val = read_kvm_id_reg(vcpu->kvm, id); + + if (id_reg && id_reg->vcpu_mask) + /* Clear fields for opt-in features that are not configured. */ + val &= ~(id_reg->vcpu_mask(vcpu, id_reg)); switch (id) { case SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1: @@ -1229,12 +1418,7 @@ static int set_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, return 0; } -/* - * cpufeature ID register user accessors - * - * For now, these registers are immutable for userspace, so for set_id_reg() - * we don't allow the effective value to be changed. - */ +/* cpufeature ID register user accessors */ static int __get_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr, bool raz) @@ -1245,11 +1429,31 @@ static int __get_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, return reg_to_user(uaddr, &val, id); } -static int __set_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, +/* + * Check if the given id indicates AArch32 ID register encoding. + */ +static bool is_aarch32_id_reg(u32 id) +{ + u32 crm, op2; + + if (!is_id_reg(id)) + return false; + + crm = sys_reg_CRm(id); + op2 = sys_reg_Op2(id); + if (crm == 1 || crm == 2 || (crm == 3 && (op2 != 3 && op2 != 7))) + /* AArch32 ID register */ + return true; + + return false; +} + +static int __set_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr, bool raz) { const u64 id = sys_reg_to_index(rd); + u32 encoding = reg_to_encoding(rd); int err; u64 val; @@ -1257,11 +1461,28 @@ static int __set_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, if (err) return err; - /* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */ - if (val != read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz)) + if (val == read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz)) + /* The value is same as the current value. Nothing to do. */ + return 0; + + /* + * Don't allow to modify the register's value if the register is raz, + * or the reg doesn't have the id_reg_info. + */ + if (raz || !GET_ID_REG_INFO(encoding)) return -EINVAL; - return 0; + /* + * Skip the validation of AArch32 ID registers if the system doesn't + * 32bit EL0 (their value are UNKNOWN). + */ + if (system_supports_32bit_el0() || !is_aarch32_id_reg(encoding)) { + err = validate_id_reg(vcpu, encoding, val); + if (err) + return err; + } + + return __write_id_reg(vcpu, encoding, val); } static int get_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, @@ -2823,6 +3044,20 @@ int kvm_arm_copy_sys_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices) return write_demux_regids(uindices); } +static void id_reg_info_init_all(void) +{ + int i; + struct id_reg_info *id_reg; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_info_table); i++) { + id_reg = (struct id_reg_info *)id_reg_info_table[i]; + if (!id_reg) + continue; + + id_reg_info_init(id_reg); + } +} + void kvm_sys_reg_table_init(void) { unsigned int i; @@ -2857,6 +3092,8 @@ void kvm_sys_reg_table_init(void) break; /* Clear all higher bits. */ cache_levels &= (1 << (i*3))-1; + + id_reg_info_init_all(); } /* @@ -2869,11 +3106,12 @@ void set_default_id_regs(struct kvm *kvm) u32 id; const struct sys_reg_desc *rd; u64 val; + struct id_reg_info *idr; for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sys_reg_descs); i++) { rd = &sys_reg_descs[i]; if (rd->access != access_id_reg) - /* Not ID register, or hidden/reserved ID register */ + /* Not ID register or hidden/reserved ID register */ continue; id = reg_to_encoding(rd); @@ -2881,7 +3119,21 @@ void set_default_id_regs(struct kvm *kvm) /* Shouldn't happen */ continue; - val = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id); - kvm->arch.id_regs[IDREG_IDX(id)] = val; + idr = GET_ID_REG_INFO(id); + val = idr ? idr->vcpu_limit_val : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id); + WARN_ON_ONCE(write_kvm_id_reg(kvm, id, val)); } } + +/* + * Update the ID register's field with @fval for the guest. + * The caller is expected to hold the kvm->lock. + * This will not fail unless any vCPUs in the guest have started. + */ +int kvm_set_id_reg_feature(struct kvm *kvm, u32 id, u8 field_shift, u8 fval) +{ + u64 val = ((u64)fval & ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK) << field_shift; + u64 preserve_mask = ~(ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK << field_shift); + + return __modify_kvm_id_reg(kvm, id, val, preserve_mask); +}