diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v2] bpf, arm64: Sign return address for jited code

Message ID 20220402073942.3782529-1-xukuohai@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [bpf-next,v2] bpf, arm64: Sign return address for jited code | expand

Commit Message

Xu Kuohai April 2, 2022, 7:39 a.m. UTC
Sign return address for jited code when the kernel is built with pointer
authentication enabled.

1. Sign LR with paciasp instruction before LR is pushed to stack. Since
   paciasp acts like landing pads for function entry, no need to insert
   bti instruction before paciasp.

2. Authenticate LR with autiasp instruction after LR is poped from stack.

For bpf tail call, the stack frame constructed by the caller is reused by
the callee. That is, the stack frame is constructed by the caller and
destructed by the callee. Thus LR is signed and pushed to the stack in the
caller's prologue, and poped from the stack and authenticated in the
callee's epilogue.

For bpf2bpf call, the caller and callee construct their own stack frames,
and sign and authenticate their own LRs.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
---

v1->v2:
- Add bpf tail call and bpf2bpf call description to commit message
- Rebased to bpf-next

 arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h      |  3 +++
 arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org April 5, 2022, 10:10 p.m. UTC | #1
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>:

On Sat, 2 Apr 2022 03:39:42 -0400 you wrote:
> Sign return address for jited code when the kernel is built with pointer
> authentication enabled.
> 
> 1. Sign LR with paciasp instruction before LR is pushed to stack. Since
>    paciasp acts like landing pads for function entry, no need to insert
>    bti instruction before paciasp.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v2] bpf, arm64: Sign return address for jited code
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/042152c27c3b

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h
index 3920213244f0..194c95ccc1cf 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -263,6 +263,9 @@ 
 /* HINTs */
 #define A64_HINT(x) aarch64_insn_gen_hint(x)
 
+#define A64_PACIASP A64_HINT(AARCH64_INSN_HINT_PACIASP)
+#define A64_AUTIASP A64_HINT(AARCH64_INSN_HINT_AUTIASP)
+
 /* BTI */
 #define A64_BTI_C  A64_HINT(AARCH64_INSN_HINT_BTIC)
 #define A64_BTI_J  A64_HINT(AARCH64_INSN_HINT_BTIJ)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 093fa9ea1083..8ab4035dea27 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -236,7 +236,8 @@  static bool is_lsi_offset(int offset, int scale)
 }
 
 /* Tail call offset to jump into */
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL)
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL) || \
+	IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL)
 #define PROLOGUE_OFFSET 9
 #else
 #define PROLOGUE_OFFSET 8
@@ -278,8 +279,11 @@  static int build_prologue(struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool ebpf_from_cbpf)
 	 *
 	 */
 
+	/* Sign lr */
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL))
+		emit(A64_PACIASP, ctx);
 	/* BTI landing pad */
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL))
+	else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL))
 		emit(A64_BTI_C, ctx);
 
 	/* Save FP and LR registers to stay align with ARM64 AAPCS */
@@ -580,6 +584,10 @@  static void build_epilogue(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
 	/* Set return value */
 	emit(A64_MOV(1, A64_R(0), r0), ctx);
 
+	/* Authenticate lr */
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL))
+		emit(A64_AUTIASP, ctx);
+
 	emit(A64_RET(A64_LR), ctx);
 }