| Message ID | 20220404102419.1159705-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | firmware: arm_scmi: Fix sparse warnings in OPTEE transport driver | expand |
On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 11:24:19 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > The sparse checker complains about converting pointers between address > spaces. We correctly stored an __iomem pointer in struct scmi_optee_channel, > but discarded the __iomem when returning it from get_channel_shm, causing one > warning. Then we passed the non-__iomem pointer return from get_channel_shm > at tow other places, where an __iomem pointer is expected, causing couple of > other warnings > > [...] Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (fixes/scmi), thanks! [1/1] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix sparse warnings in OPTEE transport driver https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/bf36619a54 -- Regards, Sudeep
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c index 734f1eeee161..8302a2b4aeeb 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c @@ -405,8 +405,8 @@ static int scmi_optee_chan_free(int id, void *p, void *data) return 0; } -static struct scmi_shared_mem *get_channel_shm(struct scmi_optee_channel *chan, - struct scmi_xfer *xfer) +static struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem * +get_channel_shm(struct scmi_optee_channel *chan, struct scmi_xfer *xfer) { if (!chan) return NULL; @@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ static int scmi_optee_send_message(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct scmi_xfer *xfer) { struct scmi_optee_channel *channel = cinfo->transport_info; - struct scmi_shared_mem *shmem = get_channel_shm(channel, xfer); + struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *shmem = get_channel_shm(channel, xfer); int ret; mutex_lock(&channel->mu); @@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ static void scmi_optee_fetch_response(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct scmi_xfer *xfer) { struct scmi_optee_channel *channel = cinfo->transport_info; - struct scmi_shared_mem *shmem = get_channel_shm(channel, xfer); + struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *shmem = get_channel_shm(channel, xfer); shmem_fetch_response(shmem, xfer); }
The sparse checker complains about converting pointers between address spaces. We correctly stored an __iomem pointer in struct scmi_optee_channel, but discarded the __iomem when returning it from get_channel_shm, causing one warning. Then we passed the non-__iomem pointer return from get_channel_shm at tow other places, where an __iomem pointer is expected, causing couple of other warnings Add the appropriate __iomem annotations at all places where it is missing. optee.c:414:20: warning: incorrect type in return expression (different address spaces) optee.c:414:20: expected struct scmi_shared_mem * optee.c:414:20: got struct scmi_shared_mem [noderef] __iomem *shmem optee.c:426:26: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) optee.c:426:26: expected struct scmi_shared_mem [noderef] __iomem *shmem optee.c:426:26: got struct scmi_shared_mem *shmem optee.c:441:30: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) optee.c:441:30: expected struct scmi_shared_mem [noderef] __iomem *shmem optee.c:441:30: got struct scmi_shared_mem *shmem Cc: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org> Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> --- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)