From patchwork Mon Apr 4 10:24:19 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Sudeep Holla X-Patchwork-Id: 12800090 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDAF8C433F5 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 10:25:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc :To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: List-Owner; bh=QP3v2/NZ8et1/KvfgHrlGZkynNvtZ0OG1Da1dHXKVrA=; b=ZO45LtM9IF53+w pI6+TvFqqSh1VlrFzYnne+kwVuBPb5LrUwNdOhierqVFO0eNpBbcpU/c7o/cpArjfXHbbZ5Uel/S5 bKFYMqBEEbYe6kDHhPP9BAtaHByS50K/YnffS0q21gnUCQp1z3trXKIPzrmBYrXW58k9XCwK+44N8 1HuKf/qmIbTZa9V9OedQK4zwC0z7dUXgrLy4RPk398oSysRTsTzhflQAs933syEJ0CPwH1cY+uFPH UozvZr+BsHifynMl081PD2F5movrSJpGuor7jRqp2/iDxVtWVuMzC6qq55bhYTDQYSICMmrzYHZ5E q3YNbOCS7EzZGFkw261w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nbJt5-00EUeo-JT; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 10:24:43 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nbJt2-00EUdt-9I for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 10:24:41 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF55E1FB; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 03:24:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa.arm.com (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id ECE1B3F718; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 03:24:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Sudeep Holla To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Sudeep Holla , Etienne Carriere , Cristian Marussi , kernel test robot Subject: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix sparse warnings in OPTEE transport driver Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 11:24:19 +0100 Message-Id: <20220404102419.1159705-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220404_032440_405653_EEE41332 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.38 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The sparse checker complains about converting pointers between address spaces. We correctly stored an __iomem pointer in struct scmi_optee_channel, but discarded the __iomem when returning it from get_channel_shm, causing one warning. Then we passed the non-__iomem pointer return from get_channel_shm at tow other places, where an __iomem pointer is expected, causing couple of other warnings Add the appropriate __iomem annotations at all places where it is missing. optee.c:414:20: warning: incorrect type in return expression (different address spaces) optee.c:414:20: expected struct scmi_shared_mem * optee.c:414:20: got struct scmi_shared_mem [noderef] __iomem *shmem optee.c:426:26: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) optee.c:426:26: expected struct scmi_shared_mem [noderef] __iomem *shmem optee.c:426:26: got struct scmi_shared_mem *shmem optee.c:441:30: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) optee.c:441:30: expected struct scmi_shared_mem [noderef] __iomem *shmem optee.c:441:30: got struct scmi_shared_mem *shmem Cc: Etienne Carriere Cc: Cristian Marussi Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla --- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c index 734f1eeee161..8302a2b4aeeb 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c @@ -405,8 +405,8 @@ static int scmi_optee_chan_free(int id, void *p, void *data) return 0; } -static struct scmi_shared_mem *get_channel_shm(struct scmi_optee_channel *chan, - struct scmi_xfer *xfer) +static struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem * +get_channel_shm(struct scmi_optee_channel *chan, struct scmi_xfer *xfer) { if (!chan) return NULL; @@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ static int scmi_optee_send_message(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct scmi_xfer *xfer) { struct scmi_optee_channel *channel = cinfo->transport_info; - struct scmi_shared_mem *shmem = get_channel_shm(channel, xfer); + struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *shmem = get_channel_shm(channel, xfer); int ret; mutex_lock(&channel->mu); @@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ static void scmi_optee_fetch_response(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct scmi_xfer *xfer) { struct scmi_optee_channel *channel = cinfo->transport_info; - struct scmi_shared_mem *shmem = get_channel_shm(channel, xfer); + struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *shmem = get_channel_shm(channel, xfer); shmem_fetch_response(shmem, xfer); }