diff mbox series

[04/11] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Add DSI init in bridge pre_enable()

Message ID 20220408162108.184583-5-jagan@amarulasolutions.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series drm: bridge: Add Samsung MIPI DSIM bridge | expand

Commit Message

Jagan Teki April 8, 2022, 4:21 p.m. UTC
Host transfer() in DSI master will invoke only when the DSI commands
are sent from DSI devices like DSI Panel or DSI bridges and this
host transfer wouldn't invoke for I2C-based-DSI bridge drivers.

Handling DSI host initialization in transfer calls misses the
controller setup for I2C configured DSI bridges.

This patch adds the DSI initialization from transfer to bridge
pre_enable as the bridge pre_enable API is invoked by core as
it is common across all classes of DSI device drivers.

v1:
* keep DSI init in host transfer

Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

Comments

Adam Ford April 11, 2022, 12:23 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 11:22 AM Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
>
> Host transfer() in DSI master will invoke only when the DSI commands
> are sent from DSI devices like DSI Panel or DSI bridges and this
> host transfer wouldn't invoke for I2C-based-DSI bridge drivers.
>
> Handling DSI host initialization in transfer calls misses the
> controller setup for I2C configured DSI bridges.
>
> This patch adds the DSI initialization from transfer to bridge
> pre_enable as the bridge pre_enable API is invoked by core as
> it is common across all classes of DSI device drivers.
>
> v1:
> * keep DSI init in host transfer
>
> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> index ff05c8e01cff..3e12b469dfa8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> @@ -1290,6 +1290,13 @@ static void samsung_dsim_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>         }
>
>         dsi->state |= DSIM_STATE_ENABLED;
> +
> +       if (!(dsi->state & DSIM_STATE_INITIALIZED)) {
> +               ret = samsung_dsim_init(dsi);
> +               if (ret)
> +                       return;
> +               dsi->state |= DSIM_STATE_INITIALIZED;

Out of curiosity, is there a reason that  dsi->state cannot add
DSIM_STATE_INITIALIZED inside the samsung_dsim_init function call?  It
seems to me that if samsung_dsim_init returns successfully, it should
set that flag.  I don't know if it's called from other places or not.

adam
> +       }
>  }
>
>  static void samsung_dsim_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> --
> 2.25.1
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
index ff05c8e01cff..3e12b469dfa8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
@@ -1290,6 +1290,13 @@  static void samsung_dsim_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 	}
 
 	dsi->state |= DSIM_STATE_ENABLED;
+
+	if (!(dsi->state & DSIM_STATE_INITIALIZED)) {
+		ret = samsung_dsim_init(dsi);
+		if (ret)
+			return;
+		dsi->state |= DSIM_STATE_INITIALIZED;
+	}
 }
 
 static void samsung_dsim_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,