From patchwork Tue Apr 12 17:28:14 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Nathan Huckleberry X-Patchwork-Id: 12811022 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C46F0C433EF for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 17:31:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:From:Subject:References: Mime-Version:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=ccM6MuvjxuEtJ78pAQIs3ywuFn1RShNylo+rhHkphnc=; b=DCxxF4a6IdwfB8dx5ha6O9cKdq kcjRy2MFtb1aWTXLZ0NwyVnTZy0JtSeat+2w+aBtO647MY1jdni3CB1JmNXbSChsiMV6I/Vk10aEK e3CmjC9NMBXw5Rva6c09PF7FZslmJ8H4WPf0IZlpnAWLK/UE9Hy0XLNgmbGwEhZnJ70dSo57tvHfy M+sCbQSHUH1okEVukm+dTL+erDIhH2oqj6Q4epT8gf23tIRiKCJ/7VXo9ZDLJvRIdnyXKDmhbHpOy ubKI3HPu94d2ZyQQ7TpbZSR+TNNGXyT/hYeYe7B3PQxETXsWplM378I6EcL0OfJy5YynhSWJB/aNM zavKllwQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1neKKx-00FDvt-2l; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 17:29:55 +0000 Received: from mail-vs1-xe4a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::e4a]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1neKJj-00FDUL-35 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 17:28:42 +0000 Received: by mail-vs1-xe4a.google.com with SMTP id c64-20020a671c43000000b00320a49afe2dso1431067vsc.22 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 10:28:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=lj/iUQ92ogMjgfWXrXOVNzE3lNjhN04ZzfRk2Zhnczo=; b=KBlyz3I08JnKqG90iIFIl02gFPxBQFhjF04ZknuzghMA9CUQf7wyqB/Le2M8314cnL mGfMDRl1DtwE33P71yIKbXaS8akdxoYOK70tfr3drBiJ1JOOuaMFxvFagHhgLSx/0eai hJ9moGIdLvpB4ykrlUJPNqvSZySllktyE/nBP38I5fgVmZ//w1dQMuu8W/a+bhmrR6ca f99HGxqi3xbKE1kZ1wr/tdMyjwPIbUh8ZR9vHXpddKOtqwPJv+TX3VQHSoSsjTpKZkv/ rmhIG4YNow6Ce29RkkLOjwQ8dXssDLMeOb5+w7AldlX33kFMk22Q4ROTrfpzNQFF0/55 mZzw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=lj/iUQ92ogMjgfWXrXOVNzE3lNjhN04ZzfRk2Zhnczo=; b=yXUgZq+gBQvs5RkRq1lfIA4/IkBtB/odLfpJyEZ7n6xHSFaM7u06YIHZu2kJw3UhEf jzz8Ovn5ZnhJpFJ1zcqb3THiJRnCssc01DegBMm2uEse6Rsofbw1zQOEFPbAxBK6NbTX 0qphFn83WzxvZunu3Ro9ZoXZN9cYh6FkSAHqb0JH6EH3x5wcDBPumD0WyJybX1g/H/95 NGTrkxsIL4MQgHK04gUBbk8YNVjLLni050DETInhJNgWIkP8yLzjhwo136kxFMBjoARr HvkVwZgruURudLXsvHBVkKwd1WQAV6Zskv0T3Cna8+/w3smicpsj4EaKYvYiw6hcBM4l ElLA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533VWhSEbH2R/MmaSt+nXBcwoy7c4s8LL7DoTksDlpVn0rsDvYGw Mq70xCh+scdoZyge8TrYbAnRuTOXLw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwqpIXIzcmTvbV7MyffaA/VEVrBSBOg0CATSZ3WOgIOTmY9VLR/GG5DV0ZqkwgZ840pa/bvsu+NMQ== X-Received: from nhuck.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:14:4d90:c0a8:39cc]) (user=nhuck job=sendgmr) by 2002:a05:6102:c87:b0:325:a100:e05c with SMTP id f7-20020a0561020c8700b00325a100e05cmr11815427vst.11.1649784517755; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 10:28:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 17:28:14 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20220412172816.917723-1-nhuck@google.com> Message-Id: <20220412172816.917723-7-nhuck@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20220412172816.917723-1-nhuck@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1.1178.g4f1659d476-goog Subject: [PATCH v4 6/8] crypto: x86/polyval: Add PCLMULQDQ accelerated implementation of POLYVAL From: Nathan Huckleberry To: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Cc: Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Paul Crowley , Eric Biggers , Sami Tolvanen , Ard Biesheuvel , Nathan Huckleberry X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220412_102839_198527_E442D049 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 26.33 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Add hardware accelerated version of POLYVAL for x86-64 CPUs with PCLMULQDQ support. This implementation is accelerated using PCLMULQDQ instructions to perform the finite field computations. For added efficiency, 8 blocks of the message are processed simultaneously by precomputing the first 8 powers of the key. Schoolbook multiplication is used instead of Karatsuba multiplication because it was found to be slightly faster on x86-64 machines. Montgomery reduction must be used instead of Barrett reduction due to the difference in modulus between POLYVAL's field and other finite fields. More information on POLYVAL can be found in the HCTR2 paper: Length-preserving encryption with HCTR2: https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/1441.pdf Signed-off-by: Nathan Huckleberry --- arch/x86/crypto/Makefile | 3 + arch/x86/crypto/polyval-clmulni_asm.S | 333 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/crypto/polyval-clmulni_glue.c | 234 +++++++++++++++++ crypto/Kconfig | 10 + 4 files changed, 580 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/x86/crypto/polyval-clmulni_asm.S create mode 100644 arch/x86/crypto/polyval-clmulni_glue.c diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/Makefile b/arch/x86/crypto/Makefile index 2831685adf6f..b9847152acd8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/crypto/Makefile +++ b/arch/x86/crypto/Makefile @@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ libblake2s-x86_64-y := blake2s-core.o blake2s-glue.o obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_GHASH_CLMUL_NI_INTEL) += ghash-clmulni-intel.o ghash-clmulni-intel-y := ghash-clmulni-intel_asm.o ghash-clmulni-intel_glue.o +obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_POLYVAL_CLMUL_NI) += polyval-clmulni.o +polyval-clmulni-y := polyval-clmulni_asm.o polyval-clmulni_glue.o + obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32C_INTEL) += crc32c-intel.o crc32c-intel-y := crc32c-intel_glue.o crc32c-intel-$(CONFIG_64BIT) += crc32c-pcl-intel-asm_64.o diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/polyval-clmulni_asm.S b/arch/x86/crypto/polyval-clmulni_asm.S new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..71b782c02b72 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/x86/crypto/polyval-clmulni_asm.S @@ -0,0 +1,333 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* + * Copyright 2021 Google LLC + */ +/* + * This is an efficient implementation of POLYVAL using intel PCLMULQDQ-NI + * instructions. It works on 8 blocks at a time, by precomputing the first 8 + * keys powers h^8, ..., h^1 in the POLYVAL finite field. This precomputation + * allows us to split finite field multiplication into two steps. + * + * In the first step, we consider h^i, m_i as normal polynomials of degree less + * than 128. We then compute p(x) = h^8m_0 + ... + h^1m_7 where multiplication + * is simply polynomial multiplication. + * + * In the second step, we compute the reduction of p(x) modulo the finite field + * modulus g(x) = x^128 + x^127 + x^126 + x^121 + 1. + * + * This two step process is equivalent to computing h^8m_0 + ... + h^1m_7 where + * multiplication is finite field multiplication. The advantage is that the + * two-step process only requires 1 finite field reduction for every 8 + * polynomial multiplications. Further parallelism is gained by interleaving the + * multiplications and polynomial reductions. + */ + +#include +#include + +#define STRIDE_BLOCKS 8 + +#define GSTAR %xmm7 +#define PL %xmm8 +#define PH %xmm9 +#define TMP_XMM %xmm11 +#define LO %xmm12 +#define HI %xmm13 +#define MI %xmm14 +#define SUM %xmm15 + +#define MSG %rdi +#define KEY_POWERS %rsi +#define BLOCKS_LEFT %rdx +#define TMP %rax + +.section .rodata.cst16.gstar, "aM", @progbits, 16 +.align 16 + +.Lgstar: + .quad 0xc200000000000000, 0xc200000000000000 + +.text + +/* + * Performs schoolbook1_iteration on two lists of 128-bit polynomials of length + * count pointed to by MSG and KEY_POWERS. + */ +.macro schoolbook1 count + .set i, 0 + .rept (\count) + schoolbook1_iteration i 0 + .set i, (i +1) + .endr +.endm + +/* + * Computes the product of two 128-bit polynomials at the memory locations + * specified by (MSG + 16*i) and (KEY_POWERS + 16*i) and XORs the components of the + * 256-bit product into LO, MI, HI. + * + * The multiplication produces four parts: + * LOW: The polynomial given by performing carryless multiplication of the + * bottom 64-bits of each polynomial + * MID1: The polynomial given by performing carryless multiplication of the + * bottom 64-bits of the first polynomial and the top 64-bits of the second + * MID2: The polynomial given by performing carryless multiplication of the + * bottom 64-bits of the second polynomial and the top 64-bits of the first + * HIGH: The polynomial given by performing carryless multiplication of the + * top 64-bits of each polynomial + * + * We compute: + * LO += LOW + * MI += MID1 + MID2 + * HI += HIGH + * + * LO = [L0_1 : LO_0] + * MI = [MI_1 : MI_0] + * HI = [HI_1 : HI_0] + * + * Later, the 256-bit result can be extracted as: + * [HI_1 : HI_0 + MI_1 : LO_1 + MI_0 : LO_0] + * This step is done when computing the polynomial reduction for efficiency + * reasons. + * + * If xor_sum == 1, then also XOR the value of SUM into m_0. This avoids an + * extra multiplication of SUM and h^8. + */ +.macro schoolbook1_iteration i xor_sum + movups (16*\i)(MSG), %xmm0 + .if (\i == 0 && \xor_sum == 1) + pxor SUM, %xmm0 + .endif + vpclmulqdq $0x00, (16*\i)(KEY_POWERS), %xmm0, %xmm2 + vpclmulqdq $0x01, (16*\i)(KEY_POWERS), %xmm0, %xmm1 + vpclmulqdq $0x11, (16*\i)(KEY_POWERS), %xmm0, %xmm3 + vpclmulqdq $0x10, (16*\i)(KEY_POWERS), %xmm0, %xmm4 + vpxor %xmm2, LO, LO + vpxor %xmm1, MI, MI + vpxor %xmm4, MI, MI + vpxor %xmm3, HI, HI +.endm + +/* + * Performs the same computation as schoolbook1_iteration, except we expect the + * arguments to already be loaded into xmm0 and xmm1. + */ +.macro schoolbook1_noload + vpclmulqdq $0x01, %xmm0, %xmm1, MI + vpclmulqdq $0x10, %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm2 + vpclmulqdq $0x00, %xmm0, %xmm1, LO + vpclmulqdq $0x11, %xmm0, %xmm1, HI + vpxor %xmm2, MI, MI +.endm + +/* + * Computes the 256-bit polynomial represented by LO, HI, MI. Stores + * the result in PL, PH. + * [PH :: PL] = [HI_1 : HI_0 + MI_1 :: LO_1 + MI_0 : LO_0] + */ +.macro schoolbook2 + vpslldq $8, MI, PL + vpsrldq $8, MI, PH + pxor LO, PL + pxor HI, PH +.endm + +/* + * Computes the 128-bit reduction of PL : PH. Stores the result in dest. + * + * This macro computes p(x) mod g(x) where p(x) is in montgomery form and g(x) = + * x^128 + x^127 + x^126 + x^121 + 1. + * + * We have a 256-bit polynomial PH : PL = P_3 : P_2 : P_1 : P_0 that is the product + * of two 128-bit polynomials in Montgomery form. We need to reduce it mod g(x). + * Also, since polynomials in Montgomery form have an "extra" factor of x^128, + * this product has two extra factors of x^128. To get it back into Montgomery + * form, we need to remove one of these factors by dividing by x^128. + * + * To accomplish both of these goals, we add multiples of g(x) that cancel out + * the low 128 bits P_1 : P_0, leaving just the high 128 bits. Since the low + * bits are zero, the polynomial division by x^128 can be done by right shifting. + * + * Since the only nonzero term in the low 64 bits of g(x) is the constant term, + * the multiple of g(x) needed to cancel out P_0 is P_0 * g(x). The CPU can + * only do 64x64 bit multiplications, so split P_0 * g(x) into x^128 * P_0 + + * x^64 * g*(x) * P_0 + P_0, where g*(x) is bits 64-127 of g(x). Adding this to + * the original polynomial gives P_3 : P_2 + P_0 + T_1 : P_1 + T_0 : 0, where T + * = T_1 : T_0 = g*(x) * P_0. Thus, bits 0-63 got "folded" into bits 64-191. + * + * Repeating this same process on the next 64 bits "folds" bits 64-127 into bits + * 128-255, giving the answer in bits 128-255. This time, we need to cancel P_1 + * + T_0 in bits 64-127. The multiple of g(x) required is (P_1 + T_0) * g(x) * + * x^64. Adding this to our previous computation gives P_3 + P_1 + T_0 + V_1 : + * P_2 + P_0 + T_1 + V_0 : 0 : 0, where V = V_1 : V_0 = g*(x) * (P_1 + T_0). + * + * So our final computation is: + * T = T_1 : T_0 = g*(x) * P_0 + * V = V_1 : V_0 = g*(x) * (T_0 + P_1) + * p(x) / x^{128} mod g(x) = P_3 + P_1 + T_0 + V_1 : P_2 + P_0 + T_1 + V_0 + * + * The implementation below saves a XOR instruction by computing P_1 + T_0 : P_0 + * + T_1 and XORing into dest, rather than directly XORing P_1 : P_0, T_0 : T1 + * into dest. This allows us to reuse P_1 + T_0 when computing V. + */ +.macro montgomery_reduction dest + vpclmulqdq $0x00, GSTAR, PL, TMP_XMM # TMP_XMM = T_1 : T_0 = P_0 * g*(x) + pshufd $0b01001110, TMP_XMM, TMP_XMM # TMP_XMM = T_0 : T_1 + pxor PL, TMP_XMM # TMP_XMM = P_1 + T_0 : P_0 + T_1 + pxor TMP_XMM, PH # PH = P_3 + P_1 + T_0 : P_2 + P_0 + T_1 + pclmulqdq $0x11, GSTAR, TMP_XMM # TMP_XMM = V_1 : V_0 = V = [(P_1 + T_0) * g*(x)] + vpxor TMP_XMM, PH, \dest +.endm + +/* + * Compute schoolbook multiplication for 8 blocks + * m_0h^8 + ... + m_7h^1 + * + * If reduce is set, also computes the montgomery reduction of the + * previous full_stride call and XORs with the first message block. + * (m_0 + REDUCE(PL, PH))h^8 + ... + m_7h^1. + * I.e., the first multiplication uses m_0 + REDUCE(PL, PH) instead of m_0. + * + * Sets PL, PH + * Clobbers LO, HI, MI + * + */ +.macro full_stride reduce + pxor LO, LO + pxor HI, HI + pxor MI, MI + + schoolbook1_iteration 7 0 + .if (\reduce) + vpclmulqdq $0x00, GSTAR, PL, TMP_XMM + .endif + + schoolbook1_iteration 6 0 + .if (\reduce) + pshufd $0b01001110, TMP_XMM, TMP_XMM + .endif + + schoolbook1_iteration 5 0 + .if (\reduce) + pxor PL, TMP_XMM + .endif + + schoolbook1_iteration 4 0 + .if (\reduce) + pxor TMP_XMM, PH + .endif + + schoolbook1_iteration 3 0 + .if (\reduce) + pclmulqdq $0x11, GSTAR, TMP_XMM + .endif + + schoolbook1_iteration 2 0 + .if (\reduce) + vpxor TMP_XMM, PH, SUM + .endif + + schoolbook1_iteration 1 0 + + schoolbook1_iteration 0 1 + + addq $(8*16), MSG + schoolbook2 +.endm + +/* + * Process BLOCKS_LEFT blocks, where 0 < BLOCKS_LEFT < STRIDE_BLOCKS + */ +.macro partial_stride + mov BLOCKS_LEFT, TMP + shlq $4, TMP + addq $(16*STRIDE_BLOCKS), KEY_POWERS + subq TMP, KEY_POWERS + + movups (MSG), %xmm0 + pxor SUM, %xmm0 + movaps (KEY_POWERS), %xmm1 + schoolbook1_noload + dec BLOCKS_LEFT + addq $16, MSG + addq $16, KEY_POWERS + + test $4, BLOCKS_LEFT + jz .Lpartial4BlocksDone + schoolbook1 4 + addq $(4*16), MSG + addq $(4*16), KEY_POWERS +.Lpartial4BlocksDone: + test $2, BLOCKS_LEFT + jz .Lpartial2BlocksDone + schoolbook1 2 + addq $(2*16), MSG + addq $(2*16), KEY_POWERS +.Lpartial2BlocksDone: + test $1, BLOCKS_LEFT + jz .LpartialDone + schoolbook1 1 +.LpartialDone: + schoolbook2 + montgomery_reduction SUM +.endm + +/* + * Perform montgomery multiplication in GF(2^128) and store result in op1. + * + * Computes op1*op2*x^{-128} mod x^128 + x^127 + x^126 + x^121 + 1 + * If op1, op2 are in montgomery form, this computes the montgomery + * form of op1*op2. + * + * void clmul_polyval_mul(u8 *op1, const u8 *op2); + */ +SYM_FUNC_START(clmul_polyval_mul) + FRAME_BEGIN + vmovdqa .Lgstar(%rip), GSTAR + movups (%rdi), %xmm0 + movups (%rsi), %xmm1 + schoolbook1_noload + schoolbook2 + montgomery_reduction SUM + movups SUM, (%rdi) + FRAME_END + RET +SYM_FUNC_END(clmul_polyval_mul) + +/* + * Perform polynomial evaluation as specified by POLYVAL. This computes: + * h^n * accumulator + h^n * m_0 + ... + h^1 * m_{n-1} + * where n=nblocks, h is the hash key, and m_i are the message blocks. + * + * rdi - pointer to message blocks + * rsi - pointer to precomputed key powers h^8 ... h^1 + * rdx - number of blocks to hash + * rcx - pointer to the accumulator + * + * void clmul_polyval_update(const u8 *in, const struct polyval_ctx *ctx, + * size_t nblocks, u8 *accumulator); + */ +SYM_FUNC_START(clmul_polyval_update) + FRAME_BEGIN + vmovdqa .Lgstar(%rip), GSTAR + movups (%rcx), SUM + subq $STRIDE_BLOCKS, BLOCKS_LEFT + js .LstrideLoopExit + full_stride 0 + subq $STRIDE_BLOCKS, BLOCKS_LEFT + js .LstrideLoopExitReduce +.LstrideLoop: + full_stride 1 + subq $STRIDE_BLOCKS, BLOCKS_LEFT + jns .LstrideLoop +.LstrideLoopExitReduce: + montgomery_reduction SUM +.LstrideLoopExit: + add $STRIDE_BLOCKS, BLOCKS_LEFT + jz .LskipPartial + partial_stride +.LskipPartial: + movups SUM, (%rcx) + FRAME_END + RET +SYM_FUNC_END(clmul_polyval_update) diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/polyval-clmulni_glue.c b/arch/x86/crypto/polyval-clmulni_glue.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..4f62284f980c --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/x86/crypto/polyval-clmulni_glue.c @@ -0,0 +1,234 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * Accelerated POLYVAL implementation with Intel PCLMULQDQ-NI + * instructions. This file contains glue code. + * + * Copyright (c) 2007 Nokia Siemens Networks - Mikko Herranen + * Copyright (c) 2009 Intel Corp. + * Author: Huang Ying + * Copyright 2021 Google LLC + */ +/* + * Glue code based on ghash-clmulni-intel_glue.c. + * + * This implementation of POLYVAL uses montgomery multiplication + * accelerated by PCLMULQDQ-NI to implement the finite field + * operations. + * + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#define NUM_PRECOMPUTE_POWERS 8 + +struct polyval_ctx { + /* + * These powers must be in the order h^8, ..., h^1. + */ + u8 key_powers[NUM_PRECOMPUTE_POWERS][POLYVAL_BLOCK_SIZE]; +}; + +struct polyval_desc_ctx { + u8 buffer[POLYVAL_BLOCK_SIZE]; + u32 bytes; +}; + +asmlinkage void clmul_polyval_update(const u8 *in, struct polyval_ctx *keys, + size_t nblocks, u8 *accumulator); +asmlinkage void clmul_polyval_mul(u8 *op1, const u8 *op2); + +static void reverse_be128(be128 *x) +{ + __be64 a = x->a; + __be64 b = x->b; + + x->a = swab64(b); + x->b = swab64(a); +} + +static void generic_polyval_mul(u8 *op1, const u8 *op2) +{ + be128 a, b; + + // Assume one argument is in Montgomery form and one is not. + memcpy(&a, op1, sizeof(a)); + memcpy(&b, op2, sizeof(b)); + reverse_be128(&a); + reverse_be128(&b); + gf128mul_x_lle(&a, &a); + gf128mul_lle(&a, &b); + reverse_be128(&a); + memcpy(op1, &a, sizeof(a)); +} + +static void generic_polyval_update(const u8 *in, struct polyval_ctx *keys, + size_t nblocks, u8 *accumulator) +{ + while (nblocks--) { + crypto_xor(accumulator, in, POLYVAL_BLOCK_SIZE); + generic_polyval_mul(accumulator, keys->key_powers[7]); + in += POLYVAL_BLOCK_SIZE; + } +} + +static void internal_polyval_update(const u8 *in, struct polyval_ctx *keys, + size_t nblocks, u8 *accumulator) +{ + if (likely(crypto_simd_usable())) { + kernel_fpu_begin(); + clmul_polyval_update(in, keys, nblocks, accumulator); + kernel_fpu_end(); + } else { + generic_polyval_update(in, keys, nblocks, accumulator); + } +} + +static void internal_polyval_mul(u8 *op1, const u8 *op2) +{ + if (likely(crypto_simd_usable())) { + kernel_fpu_begin(); + clmul_polyval_mul(op1, op2); + kernel_fpu_end(); + } else { + generic_polyval_mul(op1, op2); + } +} + +static int polyval_init(struct shash_desc *desc) +{ + struct polyval_desc_ctx *dctx = shash_desc_ctx(desc); + + memset(dctx, 0, sizeof(*dctx)); + + return 0; +} + +static int polyval_setkey(struct crypto_shash *tfm, + const u8 *key, unsigned int keylen) +{ + struct polyval_ctx *ctx = crypto_shash_ctx(tfm); + int i; + + if (keylen != POLYVAL_BLOCK_SIZE) + return -EINVAL; + + memcpy(ctx->key_powers[NUM_PRECOMPUTE_POWERS-1], key, + POLYVAL_BLOCK_SIZE); + + for (i = NUM_PRECOMPUTE_POWERS-2; i >= 0; i--) { + memcpy(ctx->key_powers[i], key, POLYVAL_BLOCK_SIZE); + internal_polyval_mul(ctx->key_powers[i], ctx->key_powers[i+1]); + } + + return 0; +} + +static int polyval_update(struct shash_desc *desc, + const u8 *src, unsigned int srclen) +{ + struct polyval_desc_ctx *dctx = shash_desc_ctx(desc); + struct polyval_ctx *ctx = crypto_shash_ctx(desc->tfm); + u8 *pos; + unsigned int nblocks; + int n; + + if (dctx->bytes) { + n = min(srclen, dctx->bytes); + pos = dctx->buffer + POLYVAL_BLOCK_SIZE - dctx->bytes; + + dctx->bytes -= n; + srclen -= n; + + while (n--) + *pos++ ^= *src++; + + if (!dctx->bytes) + internal_polyval_mul(dctx->buffer, + ctx->key_powers[NUM_PRECOMPUTE_POWERS-1]); + } + + nblocks = srclen/POLYVAL_BLOCK_SIZE; + internal_polyval_update(src, ctx, nblocks, dctx->buffer); + srclen -= nblocks*POLYVAL_BLOCK_SIZE; + + if (srclen) { + dctx->bytes = POLYVAL_BLOCK_SIZE - srclen; + src += nblocks*POLYVAL_BLOCK_SIZE; + pos = dctx->buffer; + while (srclen--) + *pos++ ^= *src++; + } + + return 0; +} + +static int polyval_final(struct shash_desc *desc, u8 *dst) +{ + struct polyval_desc_ctx *dctx = shash_desc_ctx(desc); + struct polyval_ctx *ctx = crypto_shash_ctx(desc->tfm); + + if (dctx->bytes) { + internal_polyval_mul(dctx->buffer, + ctx->key_powers[NUM_PRECOMPUTE_POWERS-1]); + } + + dctx->bytes = 0; + memcpy(dst, dctx->buffer, POLYVAL_BLOCK_SIZE); + + return 0; +} + +static struct shash_alg polyval_alg = { + .digestsize = POLYVAL_DIGEST_SIZE, + .init = polyval_init, + .update = polyval_update, + .final = polyval_final, + .setkey = polyval_setkey, + .descsize = sizeof(struct polyval_desc_ctx), + .base = { + .cra_name = "polyval", + .cra_driver_name = "polyval-clmulni", + .cra_priority = 200, + .cra_blocksize = POLYVAL_BLOCK_SIZE, + .cra_ctxsize = sizeof(struct polyval_ctx), + .cra_module = THIS_MODULE, + }, +}; + +static const struct x86_cpu_id pcmul_cpu_id[] = { + X86_MATCH_FEATURE(X86_FEATURE_PCLMULQDQ, NULL), /* Pickle-Mickle-Duck */ + {} +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, pcmul_cpu_id); + +static int __init polyval_clmulni_mod_init(void) +{ + if (!x86_match_cpu(pcmul_cpu_id)) + return -ENODEV; + + return crypto_register_shash(&polyval_alg); +} + +static void __exit polyval_clmulni_mod_exit(void) +{ + crypto_unregister_shash(&polyval_alg); +} + +module_init(polyval_clmulni_mod_init); +module_exit(polyval_clmulni_mod_exit); + +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("POLYVAL hash function accelerated by PCLMULQDQ-NI"); +MODULE_ALIAS_CRYPTO("polyval"); +MODULE_ALIAS_CRYPTO("polyval-clmulni"); diff --git a/crypto/Kconfig b/crypto/Kconfig index aa06af0e0ebe..c6aec88213b1 100644 --- a/crypto/Kconfig +++ b/crypto/Kconfig @@ -787,6 +787,16 @@ config CRYPTO_POLYVAL POLYVAL is the hash function used in HCTR2. It is not a general-purpose cryptographic hash function. +config CRYPTO_POLYVAL_CLMUL_NI + tristate "POLYVAL hash function (CLMUL-NI accelerated)" + depends on X86 && 64BIT + select CRYPTO_CRYPTD + select CRYPTO_POLYVAL + help + This is the x86_64 CLMUL-NI accelerated implementation of POLYVAL. It is + used to efficiently implement HCTR2 on x86-64 processors that support + carry-less multiplication instructions. + config CRYPTO_POLY1305 tristate "Poly1305 authenticator algorithm" select CRYPTO_HASH