| Message ID | 20220702190135.51744-1-samuel@sholland.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/2] clk: sunxi: Limit legacy clocks to 32-bit ARM | expand |
Dne sobota, 02. julij 2022 ob 21:01:34 CEST je Samuel Holland napisal(a): > The sunxi legacy clocks were never compatible with any 64-bit SoC, > so there is no point in building them as part of a 64-bit ARM kernel. > They make even less sense being built in to a 64-bit RISC-V kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org> Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> Best regards, Jernej
Dne sobota, 02. julij 2022 ob 21:09:18 CEST je Jernej Škrabec napisal(a): > Dne sobota, 02. julij 2022 ob 21:01:34 CEST je Samuel Holland napisal(a): > > The sunxi legacy clocks were never compatible with any 64-bit SoC, > > so there is no point in building them as part of a 64-bit ARM kernel. > > They make even less sense being built in to a 64-bit RISC-V kernel. > > > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org> > > Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> Applied both, thanks! Best regards, Jernej
diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/sunxi/Kconfig index 3fba3d3ac9a2..a5c237610357 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/Kconfig @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only menuconfig CLK_SUNXI bool "Legacy clock support for Allwinner SoCs" - depends on ARCH_SUNXI || COMPILE_TEST + depends on (ARM && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST default y if CLK_SUNXI
The sunxi legacy clocks were never compatible with any 64-bit SoC, so there is no point in building them as part of a 64-bit ARM kernel. They make even less sense being built in to a 64-bit RISC-V kernel. Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org> --- drivers/clk/sunxi/Kconfig | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)