From patchwork Fri Jul 15 10:26:08 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Sudeep Holla X-Patchwork-Id: 12918991 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B976CCA47F for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 10:27:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc :To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: List-Owner; bh=+hOHbOFdwVTqI35uFY3nPL5OsAbIdJMrV5KI0D6YZQs=; b=3PGjCeYtZ9zF6M HgFCf9ER9oiU4dsqpSwGeayazsqO6HsxqCBuQPTwq6P4v/TmqaD+6abxikVhh6Amn/3ifXnRn9pXy 6uW3HTVYQAVq7qei8LpUnFIvxZpXZ/WlHw7kJW3bBSfyQi/wBev5DjBVnNwd8nUBfu6LaqTVHTCFA V5eIpgnPL3SPKVCHMk8sLvUMDJXH4XJqIEuDF5GwQPU70zK5jLAiqOzvv6rcuIYq2uzccBdqpS7aG UZVwSWqIhHsruKBSQkO6IHXog+XevMXSy2qB7pgBWaomqmkWO/paCAZFnfKbk7ZrmpvIB54D8h0Rm QxgKWmgJ7AEmFCUtdphw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oCIWq-006Kni-55; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 10:26:36 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oCIWm-006Kkz-Na; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 10:26:34 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942BD1474; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 03:26:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa.arm.com (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C99223F792; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 03:26:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Sudeep Holla To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Conor Dooley Cc: Sudeep Holla , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Ionela Voinescu , Pierre Gondois , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH -next v2 1/2] cacheinfo: Use atomic allocation for percpu cache attributes Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:26:08 +0100 Message-Id: <20220715102609.2160689-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220715_032632_838076_FFA5CFDE X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.21 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On couple of architectures like RISC-V and ARM64, we need to detect cache attribues quite early during the boot when the secondary CPUs start. So we will call detect_cache_attributes in the atomic context and since use of normal allocation can sleep, we will end up getting "sleeping in the atomic context" bug splat. In order avoid that, move the allocation to use atomic version in preparation to move the actual detection of cache attributes in the CPU hotplug path which is atomic. Cc: Ionela Voinescu Tested-by: Conor Dooley Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla Acked-by: Conor Dooley --- drivers/base/cacheinfo.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Hi Greg, Can you apply these couple of patches directly if and when you are happy with them ? Regards, Sudeep v1->v2: This was added in v2 -- 2.37.1 diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c index 65d566ff24c4..4b5cd08c5a65 100644 --- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c +++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ int detect_cache_attributes(unsigned int cpu) return -ENOENT; per_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu) = kcalloc(cache_leaves(cpu), - sizeof(struct cacheinfo), GFP_KERNEL); + sizeof(struct cacheinfo), GFP_ATOMIC); if (per_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu) == NULL) { cache_leaves(cpu) = 0; return -ENOMEM;