diff mbox series

[8/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Implement PMUv3p5 long counter support

Message ID 20220805135813.2102034-9-maz@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series KVM: arm64: PMU: Fixing chained events, and PMUv3p5 support | expand

Commit Message

Marc Zyngier Aug. 5, 2022, 1:58 p.m. UTC
PMUv3p5 (which is mandatory with ARMv8.5) comes with some extra
features:

- All counters are 64bit

- The overflow point is controlled by the PMCR_EL0.LP bit

Add the required checks in the helpers that control counter
width and overflow, as well as the sysreg handling for the LP
bit. A new kvm_pmu_is_3p5() helper makes it easy to spot the
PMUv3p5 specific handling.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 8 +++++---
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 4 ++++
 include/kvm/arm_pmu.h     | 8 ++++++++
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Oliver Upton Aug. 10, 2022, 7:16 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Marc,

On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 02:58:12PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> PMUv3p5 (which is mandatory with ARMv8.5) comes with some extra
> features:
> 
> - All counters are 64bit
> 
> - The overflow point is controlled by the PMCR_EL0.LP bit
> 
> Add the required checks in the helpers that control counter
> width and overflow, as well as the sysreg handling for the LP
> bit. A new kvm_pmu_is_3p5() helper makes it easy to spot the
> PMUv3p5 specific handling.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 8 +++++---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 4 ++++
>  include/kvm/arm_pmu.h     | 8 ++++++++
>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> index 33a88ca7b7fd..b33a2953cbf6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> @@ -50,13 +50,15 @@ static u32 kvm_pmu_event_mask(struct kvm *kvm)
>   */
>  static bool kvm_pmu_idx_is_64bit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
>  {
> -	return (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
> +	return (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX || kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu));
>  }
>  
>  static bool kvm_pmu_idx_has_64bit_overflow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
>  {
> -	return (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX &&
> -		__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC);
> +	u64 val = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0);
> +
> +	return (select_idx < ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX && (val & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP)) ||
> +	       (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX && (val & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC));
>  }
>  
>  static bool kvm_pmu_counter_can_chain(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 idx)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index c0595f31dab8..2b5e0ec5c100 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -654,6 +654,8 @@ static void reset_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
>  	       | (ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_MASK & 0xdecafbad)) & (~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E);
>  	if (!system_supports_32bit_el0())
>  		val |= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC;
> +	if (!kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu))
> +		val &= ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP;
>  	__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = val;
>  }
>  
> @@ -703,6 +705,8 @@ static bool access_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
>  		val |= p->regval & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_MASK;
>  		if (!system_supports_32bit_el0())
>  			val |= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC;
> +		if (!kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu))
> +			val &= ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP;
>  		__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) = val;
>  		kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(vcpu, val);
>  		kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_guest(vcpu);
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> index 6bda9b071084..846502251923 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -89,6 +89,13 @@ void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  			vcpu->arch.pmu.events = *kvm_get_pmu_events();	\
>  	} while (0)
>  
> +/*
> + * Evaluates as true when emulating PMUv3p5, and false otherwise.
> + */
> +#define kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu)						\
> +	(vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver >= ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_8_5 &&	\
> +	 vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver != ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF)

I don't believe the IMP_DEF condition will ever evaluate to false as
dfr0_pmuver is sanitized at initialization and writes from userspace.

>  u8 kvm_arm_pmu_get_host_pmuver(void);
>  
>  #else
> @@ -153,6 +160,7 @@ static inline u64 kvm_pmu_get_pmceid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool pmceid1)
>  }
>  
>  #define kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu)		({ false; })
> +#define kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu)		({ false; })
>  static inline void kvm_pmu_update_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>  static inline void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>  static inline void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>
Marc Zyngier Aug. 10, 2022, 9:28 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 08:16:14 +0100,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> wrote:
> 
> Hi Marc,
> 
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 02:58:12PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > PMUv3p5 (which is mandatory with ARMv8.5) comes with some extra
> > features:
> > 
> > - All counters are 64bit
> > 
> > - The overflow point is controlled by the PMCR_EL0.LP bit
> > 
> > Add the required checks in the helpers that control counter
> > width and overflow, as well as the sysreg handling for the LP
> > bit. A new kvm_pmu_is_3p5() helper makes it easy to spot the
> > PMUv3p5 specific handling.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 8 +++++---
> >  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 4 ++++
> >  include/kvm/arm_pmu.h     | 8 ++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> > index 33a88ca7b7fd..b33a2953cbf6 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> > @@ -50,13 +50,15 @@ static u32 kvm_pmu_event_mask(struct kvm *kvm)
> >   */
> >  static bool kvm_pmu_idx_is_64bit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> >  {
> > -	return (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
> > +	return (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX || kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu));
> >  }
> >  
> >  static bool kvm_pmu_idx_has_64bit_overflow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> >  {
> > -	return (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX &&
> > -		__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC);
> > +	u64 val = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0);
> > +
> > +	return (select_idx < ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX && (val & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP)) ||
> > +	       (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX && (val & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC));
> >  }
> >  
> >  static bool kvm_pmu_counter_can_chain(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 idx)
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > index c0595f31dab8..2b5e0ec5c100 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > @@ -654,6 +654,8 @@ static void reset_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> >  	       | (ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_MASK & 0xdecafbad)) & (~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E);
> >  	if (!system_supports_32bit_el0())
> >  		val |= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC;
> > +	if (!kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu))
> > +		val &= ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP;
> >  	__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = val;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -703,6 +705,8 @@ static bool access_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> >  		val |= p->regval & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_MASK;
> >  		if (!system_supports_32bit_el0())
> >  			val |= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC;
> > +		if (!kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu))
> > +			val &= ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP;
> >  		__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) = val;
> >  		kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(vcpu, val);
> >  		kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_guest(vcpu);
> > diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> > index 6bda9b071084..846502251923 100644
> > --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> > +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> > @@ -89,6 +89,13 @@ void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> >  			vcpu->arch.pmu.events = *kvm_get_pmu_events();	\
> >  	} while (0)
> >  
> > +/*
> > + * Evaluates as true when emulating PMUv3p5, and false otherwise.
> > + */
> > +#define kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu)						\
> > +	(vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver >= ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_8_5 &&	\
> > +	 vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver != ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF)
> 
> I don't believe the IMP_DEF condition will ever evaluate to false as
> dfr0_pmuver is sanitized at initialization and writes from userspace.

Good point. That's a leftover from a previous version. I'll fix that.

Thanks,

	M.
Reiji Watanabe Aug. 27, 2022, 7:09 a.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 2:28 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 08:16:14 +0100,
> Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Marc,
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 02:58:12PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > PMUv3p5 (which is mandatory with ARMv8.5) comes with some extra
> > > features:
> > >
> > > - All counters are 64bit
> > >
> > > - The overflow point is controlled by the PMCR_EL0.LP bit
> > >
> > > Add the required checks in the helpers that control counter
> > > width and overflow, as well as the sysreg handling for the LP
> > > bit. A new kvm_pmu_is_3p5() helper makes it easy to spot the
> > > PMUv3p5 specific handling.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 8 +++++---
> > >  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 4 ++++
> > >  include/kvm/arm_pmu.h     | 8 ++++++++
> > >  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> > > index 33a88ca7b7fd..b33a2953cbf6 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> > > @@ -50,13 +50,15 @@ static u32 kvm_pmu_event_mask(struct kvm *kvm)
> > >   */
> > >  static bool kvm_pmu_idx_is_64bit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> > >  {
> > > -   return (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
> > > +   return (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX || kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu));
> > >  }
> > >
> > >  static bool kvm_pmu_idx_has_64bit_overflow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> > >  {
> > > -   return (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX &&
> > > -           __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC);
> > > +   u64 val = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0);
> > > +
> > > +   return (select_idx < ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX && (val & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP)) ||
> > > +          (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX && (val & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC));
> > >  }
> > >
> > >  static bool kvm_pmu_counter_can_chain(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 idx)
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > > index c0595f31dab8..2b5e0ec5c100 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > > @@ -654,6 +654,8 @@ static void reset_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> > >            | (ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_MASK & 0xdecafbad)) & (~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E);

Not directly related to this series, but using 0xdecafbad above
appears to be odd. I think that would lead the bit 3 and 5 to be
unconditionally set in the register's reset value that the guest will
initially see even on the configuration where those should be RES0.

> > >     if (!system_supports_32bit_el0())
> > >             val |= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC;
> > > +   if (!kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu))
> > > +           val &= ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP;
> > >     __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = val;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > @@ -703,6 +705,8 @@ static bool access_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> > >             val |= p->regval & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_MASK;
> > >             if (!system_supports_32bit_el0())
> > >                     val |= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC;
> > > +           if (!kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu))
> > > +                   val &= ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP;
> > >             __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) = val;
> > >             kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(vcpu, val);
> > >             kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_guest(vcpu);
> > > diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> > > index 6bda9b071084..846502251923 100644
> > > --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> > > +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> > > @@ -89,6 +89,13 @@ void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > >                     vcpu->arch.pmu.events = *kvm_get_pmu_events();  \
> > >     } while (0)
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * Evaluates as true when emulating PMUv3p5, and false otherwise.
> > > + */
> > > +#define kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu)                                               \
> > > +   (vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver >= ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_8_5 &&       \
> > > +    vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver != ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF)
> >
> > I don't believe the IMP_DEF condition will ever evaluate to false as
> > dfr0_pmuver is sanitized at initialization and writes from userspace.
>
> Good point. That's a leftover from a previous version. I'll fix that.

With the current series, I think the dfr0_pmuver could be IMP_DEF
due to the same bug that I mentioned for the patch-6.
(https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220214065746.1230608-11-reijiw@google.com/)

Thank you,
Reiji
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
index 33a88ca7b7fd..b33a2953cbf6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
@@ -50,13 +50,15 @@  static u32 kvm_pmu_event_mask(struct kvm *kvm)
  */
 static bool kvm_pmu_idx_is_64bit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
 {
-	return (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
+	return (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX || kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu));
 }
 
 static bool kvm_pmu_idx_has_64bit_overflow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
 {
-	return (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX &&
-		__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC);
+	u64 val = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0);
+
+	return (select_idx < ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX && (val & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP)) ||
+	       (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX && (val & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC));
 }
 
 static bool kvm_pmu_counter_can_chain(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 idx)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index c0595f31dab8..2b5e0ec5c100 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -654,6 +654,8 @@  static void reset_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 	       | (ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_MASK & 0xdecafbad)) & (~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E);
 	if (!system_supports_32bit_el0())
 		val |= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC;
+	if (!kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu))
+		val &= ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP;
 	__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = val;
 }
 
@@ -703,6 +705,8 @@  static bool access_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
 		val |= p->regval & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_MASK;
 		if (!system_supports_32bit_el0())
 			val |= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC;
+		if (!kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu))
+			val &= ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP;
 		__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) = val;
 		kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(vcpu, val);
 		kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_guest(vcpu);
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
index 6bda9b071084..846502251923 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
@@ -89,6 +89,13 @@  void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 			vcpu->arch.pmu.events = *kvm_get_pmu_events();	\
 	} while (0)
 
+/*
+ * Evaluates as true when emulating PMUv3p5, and false otherwise.
+ */
+#define kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu)						\
+	(vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver >= ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_8_5 &&	\
+	 vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver != ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF)
+
 u8 kvm_arm_pmu_get_host_pmuver(void);
 
 #else
@@ -153,6 +160,7 @@  static inline u64 kvm_pmu_get_pmceid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool pmceid1)
 }
 
 #define kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu)		({ false; })
+#define kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu)		({ false; })
 static inline void kvm_pmu_update_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
 static inline void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
 static inline void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}