diff mbox series

[1/1] dt-bindings: iommu: arm-smmu: Add binding for sm6125

Message ID 20221001185715.495477-1-martin.botka@somainline.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [1/1] dt-bindings: iommu: arm-smmu: Add binding for sm6125 | expand

Commit Message

Martin Botka Oct. 1, 2022, 6:57 p.m. UTC
This patch adds binding for sm6125 SoC

Signed-off-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski Oct. 2, 2022, 8:17 a.m. UTC | #1
On 01/10/2022 20:57, Martin Botka wrote:
> This patch adds binding for sm6125 SoC

Do not use "This commit/patch".
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17.1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L95

Fix it in all your patches, please. It is just "Add binding for SM6125 SoC".

In the same time, your commit subject has redundant binding - first in
prefix, second (redundant) in "Add binding for". So just:
dt-bindings: iommu: arm-smmu: Add SM6125

Please fix both in all your patches.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org>

With subject and commit msg fixes:

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Marijn Suijten Oct. 4, 2022, 12:59 p.m. UTC | #2
On 2022-10-01 20:57:15, Martin Botka wrote:
> This patch adds binding for sm6125 SoC
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> index 9066e6df1ba1..21e15b88bae7 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ properties:
>                - qcom,sdm845-smmu-500
>                - qcom,sdx55-smmu-500
>                - qcom,sdx65-smmu-500
> +              - qcom,sm6125-smmu-500

Shouldn't this be in the list above given that you switched the APPS to
smmu-v2 in
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20221001185750.495874-1-martin.botka@somainline.org/

Alas, I don't remember which of the two compatibles is correct for this
SoC, since both were seemingly working correctly...

- Marijn

>                - qcom,sm6350-smmu-500
>                - qcom,sm6375-smmu-500
>                - qcom,sm8150-smmu-500
> -- 
> 2.37.3
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
index 9066e6df1ba1..21e15b88bae7 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@  properties:
               - qcom,sdm845-smmu-500
               - qcom,sdx55-smmu-500
               - qcom,sdx65-smmu-500
+              - qcom,sm6125-smmu-500
               - qcom,sm6350-smmu-500
               - qcom,sm6375-smmu-500
               - qcom,sm8150-smmu-500