@@ -1576,8 +1576,18 @@ static struct s5p_mfc_variant mfc_drvdata_v7 = {
.port_num = MFC_NUM_PORTS_V7,
.buf_size = &buf_size_v7,
.fw_name[0] = "s5p-mfc-v7.fw",
- .clk_names = {"mfc", "sclk_mfc"},
- .num_clocks = 2,
+ .clk_names = {"mfc"},
+ .num_clocks = 1,
+};
+
+static struct s5p_mfc_variant mfc_drvdata_v7_3250 = {
+ .version = MFC_VERSION_V7,
+ .version_bit = MFC_V7_BIT,
+ .port_num = MFC_NUM_PORTS_V7,
+ .buf_size = &buf_size_v7,
+ .fw_name[0] = "s5p-mfc-v7.fw",
+ .clk_names = {"mfc", "sclk_mfc"},
+ .num_clocks = 2,
};
static struct s5p_mfc_buf_size_v6 mfc_buf_size_v8 = {
@@ -1647,6 +1657,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id exynos_mfc_match[] = {
}, {
.compatible = "samsung,mfc-v7",
.data = &mfc_drvdata_v7,
+ }, {
+ .compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-mfc",
+ .data = &mfc_drvdata_v7_3250,
}, {
.compatible = "samsung,mfc-v8",
.data = &mfc_drvdata_v8,
commit "5441e9dafdfc6dc40fa" which adds mfc v7 support for Exynos3250 and use the same compatible string as used by Exynos5240 but both the IPs are a bit different in terms of IP clock. Lets add variant driver data based on the new compatible string "samsung,exynos3250-mfc" for Exynos3250 SoC. Suggested-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> Fixes: 5441e9dafdfc ("[media] s5p-mfc: Core support for MFC v7") Signed-off-by: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@samsung.com> --- .../media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c | 17 +++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)