diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v3,4/4] bpf: Fix comment error in fixup_kfunc_call function

Message ID 20221126094530.226629-5-yangjihong1@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series bpf: Support kernel function call in 32-bit ARM | expand

Commit Message

Yang Jihong Nov. 26, 2022, 9:45 a.m. UTC
insn->imm for kfunc is the relative address of __bpf_call_base,
instead of __bpf_base_call, Fix the comment error.

Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 193ea927aa69..eb58fea645ca 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -13927,7 +13927,7 @@  static int fixup_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	}
 
 	/* insn->imm has the btf func_id. Replace it with
-	 * an address (relative to __bpf_base_call).
+	 * an address (relative to __bpf_call_base).
 	 */
 	desc = find_kfunc_desc(env->prog, insn->imm, insn->off);
 	if (!desc) {