From patchwork Fri Feb 3 04:20:44 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Reiji Watanabe X-Patchwork-Id: 13126990 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 147EDC61DA4 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 04:23:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID: Mime-Version:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:List-Owner; bh=rgZnYx7sHavbTju5oj8KOPUopIrziuEwS7y4UXSGpZk=; b=MmX 4kNdAFtSNGwQ/LchM4bhN+nKZzsilxTiU88AeodZN6SAy7AoyFv/Vwjf+hD/CznJSdgOIqyuYzm9S njTv0YoRdnQMYLerUlkiMhAuvXgZdPTU/8c/qaa7Kq5pJRZwVXCkeXC1DK1xYv/wA6bDNAm4dkY+T rZwt5F+1UmNFn8t+q1O1cWL3LaJgrisqYjPLpy86fWX2BtiUZC9Yb9M9cigjusZGS5XuOYEa6buED 3q4e2UUv8M8y4XsWWfPVVydXA5g8YiiErhX0UpcEzDU7Hjvz7c/JxufYYIsG1JQKVW20b0ynhbdE5 mYsMw3rgtldd0hg45FDhTTrvLTEFgqw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pNnav-000JOn-M8; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 04:22:37 +0000 Received: from mail-yb1-xb49.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::b49]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pNnas-000JOM-L6 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 04:22:36 +0000 Received: by mail-yb1-xb49.google.com with SMTP id k15-20020a5b0a0f000000b007eba3f8e3baso3749467ybq.4 for ; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 20:22:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zNambxZo/zJEKdZ21/UzwbR/QB5YuwhFt4sLsPMGzRM=; b=ZXWg2YKjmgm8ZlDFLgf/h3LV7rsep5h+hB+GPf+f/Hp2pGFBB+QuUTJEfdOyPK43IM 7laY1MW/Zic6ekY1+j6LKyqnoXJMzMWal+uq++tOE9209KooB6lJ8AQ+LJd42h+4o+6f ge/fxxPWWOuoD398oUXnpHIiZAAm9rIHay5LZL1MsUzc88Sdy+cjlid+9ZPVO6+cyU2r NPAxpdEB/PU+orfZJ5rf9GLhbyd6qKfdGHBSwW9w3aMoy4XSh8cAoKERa01VkJVjgOJ1 1lV/kheaWCTEiXzzb4TRzXxEJchtdQS9cAvdFW5vgUn9ehiz//B+XA89XGQBVVmhBiFd NEEQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version:date:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zNambxZo/zJEKdZ21/UzwbR/QB5YuwhFt4sLsPMGzRM=; b=dthE7UBvrTEhzA0HFdSVKstxG2i5RmphfHCZPMHG9eLT6GJeZO/vd2o2MJkNY3izZv BVoO3cvX/q2tghdWLt81VE59RBKrr3f3uHDJs99zKXmq/VLRb5C3T2g+01wqEv+P2J4I Ytl1cmMNi4b+y9dLVJUr18AhOPZ+ILUGMJa0o/YMTwNVtwcsF06EsACelWEhAeuKHzrv r69Ad3fAKMHqskLU5jx3zAQdqvVRUs0btpekurJa+l4Oxo7jjS9uWeZJM6KL4nUzE0xx YpW4/c8W1sWURW4wrXZCWu/hs3xveJFyO3Wc3ARKDYFkCtDhmUmoupdTGOR3aggkH03d ux1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKUnztFBEL1/OkUCoYStk8djYzrw1KcPdQzphc0OQoJJ02IiUyVD 7mb7wl7/itaUjHx62jOlyUR0xmrBVos= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+yYZuo2SuxCc2twGG4s4cPWYmyIoMLoUQ5PzkRSMgb4h2JJuq4ymVVPsz70jixviVErQ+2k59pul4= X-Received: from reijiw-west4.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:20:ed76:c0a8:aa1]) (user=reijiw job=sendgmr) by 2002:a25:f50b:0:b0:7fb:c189:6d84 with SMTP id a11-20020a25f50b000000b007fbc1896d84mr769321ybe.601.1675398152601; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 20:22:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 20:20:44 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.1.519.gcb327c4b5f-goog Message-ID: <20230203042056.1794649-1-reijiw@google.com> Subject: [PATCH v3 02/14] KVM: arm64: PMU: Set the default PMU for the guest on vCPU reset From: Reiji Watanabe To: Marc Zyngier , kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, James Morse , Alexandru Elisei , Zenghui Yu , Suzuki K Poulose , Paolo Bonzini , Ricardo Koller , Oliver Upton , Jing Zhang , Raghavendra Rao Anata , Shaoqin Huang , Reiji Watanabe X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230202_202234_716119_2F5A5BBC X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.33 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org For vCPUs with PMU configured, KVM uses the sanitized value (returned from read_sanitised_ftr_reg()) of ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUVer as the default value and the limit value of that field. The sanitized value could be inappropriate for these on some heterogeneous PMU systems, as only one of PMUs on the system can be associated with the guest. Also, since the PMUVer is defined as FTR_EXACT with safe_val == 0 (in cpufeature.c), it will be zero when any PEs on the system have a different PMUVer value than the other PEs (i.e. the guest with PMU configured might see PMUVer == 0). As a guest with PMU configured is associated with one of PMUs on the system, the default and the limit PMUVer value for the guest should be set based on that PMU. Since the PMU won't be associated with the guest until some vcpu device attribute for PMU is set, KVM doesn't have that information until then though. Set the default PMU for the guest on the first vCPU reset. The following patches will use the PMUVer of the PMU as the default value of the ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUVer for vCPUs with PMU configured. Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe --- arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 14 +------------- arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c | 21 ++++++++++++++------- include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 6 ++++++ 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c index f2a89f414297..c98020ca427e 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c @@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ static bool pmu_irq_is_valid(struct kvm *kvm, int irq) return true; } -static int kvm_arm_set_vm_pmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu) +int kvm_arm_set_vm_pmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu) { lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->lock); @@ -923,18 +923,6 @@ int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) if (vcpu->arch.pmu.created) return -EBUSY; - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); - if (!kvm->arch.arm_pmu) { - /* No PMU set, get the default one */ - int ret = kvm_arm_set_vm_pmu(kvm, NULL); - - if (ret) { - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); - return ret; - } - } - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); - switch (attr->attr) { case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ: { int __user *uaddr = (int __user *)(long)attr->addr; diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c index e0267f672b8a..5d1e1acfe6ce 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c @@ -248,18 +248,30 @@ static int kvm_set_vm_width(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) */ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm; struct vcpu_reset_state reset_state; int ret; bool loaded; u32 pstate; - mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->lock); + mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); ret = kvm_set_vm_width(vcpu); if (!ret) { reset_state = vcpu->arch.reset_state; WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->arch.reset_state.reset, false); + + /* + * When the vCPU has a PMU, but no PMU is set for the guest + * yet, set the default one. + */ + if (kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu) && unlikely(!kvm->arch.arm_pmu)) { + if (kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3()) + ret = kvm_arm_set_vm_pmu(kvm, NULL); + else + ret = -EINVAL; + } } - mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); if (ret) return ret; @@ -297,11 +309,6 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) } else { pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1; } - - if (kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu) && !kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3()) { - ret = -EINVAL; - goto out; - } break; } diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h index 628775334d5e..7b5c5c8c634b 100644 --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); (vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver.imp >= ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_V3P5) u8 kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit(void); +int kvm_arm_set_vm_pmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu); #else struct kvm_pmu { @@ -168,6 +169,11 @@ static inline u8 kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit(void) return 0; } +static inline int kvm_arm_set_vm_pmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu) +{ + return 0; +} + #endif #endif