Message ID | 20230531031001.7440-1-shuijing.li@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v3] pwm: mtk_disp: Fix the disable flow of disp_pwm | expand |
Il 31/05/23 05:10, Shuijing Li ha scritto: > There is a flow error in the original mtk_disp_pwm_apply() function. > If this function is called when the clock is disabled, there will be a > chance to operate the disp_pwm register, resulting in disp_pwm exception. > Fix this accordingly. > > Fixes: 888a623db5d0 ("pwm: mtk-disp: Implement atomic API .apply()") > Signed-off-by: Shuijing Li <shuijing.li@mediatek.com> > Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> > Tested-by: Fei Shao <fshao@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
On 31/05/2023 05:10, Shuijing Li wrote: > There is a flow error in the original mtk_disp_pwm_apply() function. > If this function is called when the clock is disabled, there will be a > chance to operate the disp_pwm register, resulting in disp_pwm exception. > Fix this accordingly. Reviewed-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com>
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 11:10:01AM +0800, Shuijing Li wrote: > There is a flow error in the original mtk_disp_pwm_apply() function. > If this function is called when the clock is disabled, there will be a > chance to operate the disp_pwm register, resulting in disp_pwm exception. > Fix this accordingly. > > Fixes: 888a623db5d0 ("pwm: mtk-disp: Implement atomic API .apply()") > Signed-off-by: Shuijing Li <shuijing.li@mediatek.com> > Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> > Tested-by: Fei Shao <fshao@chromium.org> When I sent my ack for v2, I missed there was already a v3, so here again for the sake of easier maintenance: Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> > --- > Changes in v3: > Add Fixes per suggestion from the previous thread: Note that for that a new version isn't necessary, patchwork (and I think also b4) pick up a fixes line from replies. Best regards Uwe
On Wed, 31 May 2023 11:10:01 +0800, Shuijing Li wrote: > There is a flow error in the original mtk_disp_pwm_apply() function. > If this function is called when the clock is disabled, there will be a > chance to operate the disp_pwm register, resulting in disp_pwm exception. > Fix this accordingly. > > Applied, thanks! [1/1] pwm: mtk_disp: Fix the disable flow of disp_pwm commit: bc13d60e4e1e945b34769a4a4c2b172e8552abe5 Best regards,
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c index 79e321e96f56..2401b6733241 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c @@ -79,14 +79,11 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL) return -EINVAL; - if (!state->enabled) { - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN, mdp->data->enable_mask, - 0x0); - - if (mdp->enabled) { - clk_disable_unprepare(mdp->clk_mm); - clk_disable_unprepare(mdp->clk_main); - } + if (!state->enabled && mdp->enabled) { + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN, + mdp->data->enable_mask, 0x0); + clk_disable_unprepare(mdp->clk_mm); + clk_disable_unprepare(mdp->clk_main); mdp->enabled = false; return 0;