diff mbox series

[RFC,v2,2/8] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_HW_DBM for HW DBM support

Message ID 20230825093528.1637-3-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series KVM: arm64: Implement SW/HW combined dirty log | expand

Commit Message

Shameerali Kolothum Thodi Aug. 25, 2023, 9:35 a.m. UTC
KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_HW_DBM - Indicates page table walk is for HW DBM
 related updates.

No functional changes here. Only apply any HW DBM bit updates to last
level only. These will be used by a future commit where we will add
support for HW DBM.

Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h |  3 +++
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c         | 10 ++++++++++
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)

Comments

Oliver Upton Sept. 15, 2023, 10:05 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Shameer,

On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 10:35:22AM +0100, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_HW_DBM - Indicates page table walk is for HW DBM
>  related updates.
> 
> No functional changes here. Only apply any HW DBM bit updates to last
> level only. These will be used by a future commit where we will add
> support for HW DBM.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h |  3 +++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c         | 10 ++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> index d3e354bb8351..3f96bdd2086f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> @@ -219,6 +219,8 @@ typedef bool (*kvm_pgtable_force_pte_cb_t)(u64 addr, u64 end,
>   * @KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_CMO:		Visit and update table entries
>   *					without Cache maintenance
>   *					operations required.
> + * @KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_HW_DBM:		Indicates that the attribute update is
> + *					HW DBM related.
>   */
>  enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags {
>  	KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF			= BIT(0),
> @@ -228,6 +230,7 @@ enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags {
>  	KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_HANDLE_FAULT		= BIT(4),
>  	KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_BBM_TLBI		= BIT(5),
>  	KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_CMO		= BIT(6),
> +	KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_HW_DBM			= BIT(7),
>  };

Rather than making this DBM specific, call it KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_FORCE_PTE
and get rid of stage2_map_data::force_pte. Then it becomes immediately
obvious what this flag implies.
Shameerali Kolothum Thodi Sept. 18, 2023, 9:52 a.m. UTC | #2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oliver Upton [mailto:oliver.upton@linux.dev]
> Sent: 15 September 2023 23:06
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev; kvm@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; maz@kernel.org; will@kernel.org;
> catalin.marinas@arm.com; james.morse@arm.com;
> suzuki.poulose@arm.com; yuzenghui <yuzenghui@huawei.com>; zhukeqian
> <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>; Jonathan Cameron
> <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>; Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] KVM: arm64: Add
> KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_HW_DBM for HW DBM support
> 
> Hi Shameer,
> 
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 10:35:22AM +0100, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_HW_DBM - Indicates page table walk is for HW
> DBM
> >  related updates.
> >
> > No functional changes here. Only apply any HW DBM bit updates to last
> > level only. These will be used by a future commit where we will add
> > support for HW DBM.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum
> <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h |  3 +++
> >  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c         | 10 ++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> > index d3e354bb8351..3f96bdd2086f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> > @@ -219,6 +219,8 @@ typedef bool (*kvm_pgtable_force_pte_cb_t)(u64
> addr, u64 end,
> >   * @KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_CMO:		Visit and update table
> entries
> >   *					without Cache maintenance
> >   *					operations required.
> > + * @KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_HW_DBM:		Indicates that the attribute
> update is
> > + *					HW DBM related.
> >   */
> >  enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags {
> >  	KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF			= BIT(0),
> > @@ -228,6 +230,7 @@ enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags {
> >  	KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_HANDLE_FAULT		= BIT(4),
> >  	KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_BBM_TLBI		= BIT(5),
> >  	KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_CMO		= BIT(6),
> > +	KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_HW_DBM			= BIT(7),
> >  };
> 
> Rather than making this DBM specific, call it
> KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_FORCE_PTE
> and get rid of stage2_map_data::force_pte. Then it becomes immediately
> obvious what this flag implies.

Ok. Will change accordingly.

Thanks,
Shameer
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
index d3e354bb8351..3f96bdd2086f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
@@ -219,6 +219,8 @@  typedef bool (*kvm_pgtable_force_pte_cb_t)(u64 addr, u64 end,
  * @KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_CMO:		Visit and update table entries
  *					without Cache maintenance
  *					operations required.
+ * @KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_HW_DBM:		Indicates that the attribute update is
+ *					HW DBM related.
  */
 enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags {
 	KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF			= BIT(0),
@@ -228,6 +230,7 @@  enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags {
 	KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_HANDLE_FAULT		= BIT(4),
 	KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_BBM_TLBI		= BIT(5),
 	KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_CMO		= BIT(6),
+	KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_HW_DBM			= BIT(7),
 };
 
 struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
index f155b8c9e98c..1e65b8c97059 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
@@ -67,6 +67,11 @@  struct kvm_pgtable_walk_data {
 	const u64			end;
 };
 
+static bool kvm_pgtable_walk_hw_dbm(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx)
+{
+	return ctx->flags & KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_HW_DBM;
+}
+
 static bool kvm_pgtable_walk_skip_bbm_tlbi(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx)
 {
 	return unlikely(ctx->flags & KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_BBM_TLBI);
@@ -1164,6 +1169,11 @@  static int stage2_attr_walker(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
 	if (!kvm_pte_valid(ctx->old))
 		return -EAGAIN;
 
+	/* Only apply HW DBM for last level */
+	if (kvm_pgtable_walk_hw_dbm(ctx) &&
+	    ctx->level != (KVM_PGTABLE_MAX_LEVELS - 1))
+		return 0;
+
 	data->level = ctx->level;
 	data->pte = pte;
 	pte &= ~data->attr_clr;