diff mbox series

firmware: smccc: Export both soc_id functions

Message ID 20230830-smccc_export-v1-1-6ecc7661bc94@somainline.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series firmware: smccc: Export both soc_id functions | expand

Commit Message

Martin Botka Aug. 30, 2023, 1:23 p.m. UTC
arm_smccc_get_soc_id_version and arm_smccc_get_soc_id_revision
need to be exported so they can be used by modules.
Currently sun50i cpu freq driver is planning to use these functions.

Signed-off-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org>
---
 drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)


---
base-commit: 706a741595047797872e669b3101429ab8d378ef
change-id: 20230830-smccc_export-aa68d8a25539

Best regards,

Comments

Marc Zyngier Aug. 30, 2023, 2 p.m. UTC | #1
On 2023-08-30 14:23, Martin Botka wrote:
> arm_smccc_get_soc_id_version and arm_smccc_get_soc_id_revision
> need to be exported so they can be used by modules.
> Currently sun50i cpu freq driver is planning to use these functions.
> 

What for? I'm absolutely not keen on randomly exporting synbols
until we see what this is for.

Thanks,

         M.
Martin Botka Aug. 30, 2023, 2:19 p.m. UTC | #2
The patches using this are still WIP but the basic point is that H616 
has 2 die revisions (And those have
couple of other versions themselves) that require different uV and some 
frequencies are blacklisted on those
versions.

The driver is using these functions to read the revision (Not the 
version. It just looked like the logical
thing to export both and Andre confirmed. We can ofc drop the version 
symbol export if need be) and reads
trough the OPP table and selects the supported frequencies and uV for 
the chip its running on :)

I will try to get the cpufreq patches in order in the upcoming days and 
I will Cc you in those as well +
post a link to them in this thread :)

Cheers,
Martin

On Wed, Aug 30 2023 at 03:05:09 PM +01:00:00, Sudeep Holla 
<sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 2:24 PM Martin Botka 
> <martin.botka@somainline.org> wrote:
>> arm_smccc_get_soc_id_version and arm_smccc_get_soc_id_revision
>>  need to be exported so they can be used by modules.
>>  Currently sun50i cpu freq driver is planning to use these functions.
> 
> I am not against exporting these but please post along with the 
> patches using these
> exported symbols so that no one complains about you exporting the 
> symbols mentioning
> some patches that may or may not appear in the future.
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep
Sudeep Holla Aug. 30, 2023, 3:43 p.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 04:19:23PM +0200, Martin Botka wrote:
> The patches using this are still WIP but the basic point is that H616 has 2
> die revisions (And those have
> couple of other versions themselves) that require different uV and some
> frequencies are blacklisted on those
> versions.
> 
> The driver is using these functions to read the revision (Not the version.
> It just looked like the logical
> thing to export both and Andre confirmed. We can ofc drop the version symbol
> export if need be) and reads
> trough the OPP table and selects the supported frequencies and uV for the
> chip its running on :)
> 
> I will try to get the cpufreq patches in order in the upcoming days and I
> will Cc you in those as well +
> post a link to them in this thread :)
> 

For simplicity, just make this patch part of the series that adds cpufreq
support on this platform/soc. Cross referencing won't give any more confidence
that the user is also getting merged at the same time as this patch.
Martin Botka Aug. 30, 2023, 3:45 p.m. UTC | #4
Got it.

Cheers,
Martin

On Wed, Aug 30 2023 at 04:43:12 PM +01:00:00, Sudeep Holla 
<sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 04:19:23PM +0200, Martin Botka wrote:
>>  The patches using this are still WIP but the basic point is that 
>> H616 has 2
>>  die revisions (And those have
>>  couple of other versions themselves) that require different uV and 
>> some
>>  frequencies are blacklisted on those
>>  versions.
>> 
>>  The driver is using these functions to read the revision (Not the 
>> version.
>>  It just looked like the logical
>>  thing to export both and Andre confirmed. We can ofc drop the 
>> version symbol
>>  export if need be) and reads
>>  trough the OPP table and selects the supported frequencies and uV 
>> for the
>>  chip its running on :)
>> 
>>  I will try to get the cpufreq patches in order in the upcoming days 
>> and I
>>  will Cc you in those as well +
>>  post a link to them in this thread :)
>> 
> 
> For simplicity, just make this patch part of the series that adds 
> cpufreq
> support on this platform/soc. Cross referencing won't give any more 
> confidence
> that the user is also getting merged at the same time as this patch.
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c b/drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c
index db818f9dcb8e..b4224da46988 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c
@@ -64,11 +64,13 @@  s32 arm_smccc_get_soc_id_version(void)
 {
 	return smccc_soc_id_version;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_smccc_get_soc_id_version);
 
 s32 arm_smccc_get_soc_id_revision(void)
 {
 	return smccc_soc_id_revision;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_smccc_get_soc_id_revision);
 
 static int __init smccc_devices_init(void)
 {