From patchwork Sat Sep 9 08:02:04 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13378005 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3F4AEEB564 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2023 08:03:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=17ECn935CGSh4iLhktBsC1FoI2ox90ctGJ6/xz0gwS8=; b=iI/Tm2YSuWFKS8 BktoQjwVljs88+/mkWxbO0ZDedBEVcDuJ4ivkOYtMlMWUWslFyTy9dmDhqQfUu6Ww04v+Dar/Lkz6 NFtEK0XomoPfLVqf70gVoy5DoOr8aSvaT/ubMOKeRyrmWnKRFsik7MroM6uSG9R2nvKVjs+wDUQQJ wgP3gpkMTMlkGQ0kdNsC4onYRaSqHSWFPqobpW1jys50y+2B/zs6BmbZvfhZI1wcPqUsxjyycmiQS aLRq5NungiCbl4Iq2GJqs8ChuovYzjErRS8pHML7fq1TYeJNwvydxTfVFzprhV/2fAybaMjdEy37v GWlaaRlSb3ib2+vz9MKQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qesvO-00FB5w-27; Sat, 09 Sep 2023 08:02:38 +0000 Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.255]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qesvJ-00FB3d-2I for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 09 Sep 2023 08:02:36 +0000 Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga08-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4RjQQ73x8Cz1M7tv; Sat, 9 Sep 2023 16:00:31 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.90.53.73) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.31; Sat, 9 Sep 2023 16:02:22 +0800 From: Jinjie Ruan To: , , , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [PATCH net v2 2/5] net: microchip: sparx5: Fix memory leak for vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test() Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2023 16:02:04 +0800 Message-ID: <20230909080207.1174597-3-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20230909080207.1174597-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20230909080207.1174597-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.90.53.73] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230909_010234_243843_D1DE1A78 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.30 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Inject fault while probing kunit-example-test.ko, the field which is allocated by kzalloc in vcap_rule_add_action() of vcap_rule_add_action_bit/u32() is not freed, and it cause the memory leaks below. unreferenced object 0xffff0276c496b300 (size 64): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 286, jiffies 4294894224 (age 920.072s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 68 3c 62 82 00 80 ff ff 68 3c 62 82 00 80 ff ff h] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368 [<00000000514b9b37>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290 [<000000004620684a>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164 [<000000008b41c84d>] vcap_rule_add_action+0x104/0x178 [<00000000ae66c16c>] vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test+0xa4/0x990 [<00000000fcc5326c>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac [<00000000f5f45b20>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c [<0000000026284079>] kthread+0x124/0x130 [<0000000024d4a996>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff0276c496b2c0 (size 64): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 286, jiffies 4294894224 (age 920.072s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 68 3c 62 82 00 80 ff ff 68 3c 62 82 00 80 ff ff h] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368 [<00000000514b9b37>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290 [<000000004620684a>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164 [<000000008b41c84d>] vcap_rule_add_action+0x104/0x178 [<00000000607782aa>] vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test+0x100/0x990 [<00000000fcc5326c>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac [<00000000f5f45b20>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c [<0000000026284079>] kthread+0x124/0x130 [<0000000024d4a996>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff0276c496b280 (size 64): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 286, jiffies 4294894224 (age 920.072s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 68 3c 62 82 00 80 ff ff 68 3c 62 82 00 80 ff ff h] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368 [<00000000514b9b37>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290 [<000000004620684a>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164 [<000000008b41c84d>] vcap_rule_add_action+0x104/0x178 [<000000004e640602>] vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test+0x15c/0x990 [<00000000fcc5326c>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac [<00000000f5f45b20>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c [<0000000026284079>] kthread+0x124/0x130 [<0000000024d4a996>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff0276c496b240 (size 64): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 286, jiffies 4294894224 (age 920.092s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 68 3c 62 82 00 80 ff ff 68 3c 62 82 00 80 ff ff h] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368 [<00000000514b9b37>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290 [<000000004620684a>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164 [<000000008b41c84d>] vcap_rule_add_action+0x104/0x178 [<0000000011141bf8>] vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test+0x1bc/0x990 [<00000000fcc5326c>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac [<00000000f5f45b20>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c [<0000000026284079>] kthread+0x124/0x130 [<0000000024d4a996>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff0276c496b200 (size 64): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 286, jiffies 4294894224 (age 920.092s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 68 3c 62 82 00 80 ff ff 68 3c 62 82 00 80 ff ff h] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368 [<00000000514b9b37>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290 [<000000004620684a>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164 [<000000008b41c84d>] vcap_rule_add_action+0x104/0x178 [<00000000d5ed3088>] vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test+0x22c/0x990 [<00000000fcc5326c>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac [<00000000f5f45b20>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c [<0000000026284079>] kthread+0x124/0x130 [<0000000024d4a996>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Fixes: c956b9b318d9 ("net: microchip: sparx5: Adding KUNIT tests of key/action values in VCAP API") Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan --- v2: - Fix it to adhere to 80 character limit. --- .../net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c index 2fb0b8cf2b0c..f268383a7570 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c @@ -1095,6 +1095,17 @@ static void vcap_api_rule_add_keyvalue_test(struct kunit *test) vcap_free_ckf(rule); } +static void vcap_free_caf(struct vcap_rule *rule) +{ + struct vcap_client_actionfield *caf, *next_caf; + + list_for_each_entry_safe(caf, next_caf, + &rule->actionfields, ctrl.list) { + list_del(&caf->ctrl.list); + kfree(caf); + } +} + static void vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test(struct kunit *test) { struct vcap_admin admin = { @@ -1120,6 +1131,7 @@ static void vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_AF_POLICE_ENA, af->ctrl.action); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_BIT, af->ctrl.type); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x0, af->data.u1.value); + vcap_free_caf(rule); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rule->actionfields); ret = vcap_rule_add_action_bit(rule, VCAP_AF_POLICE_ENA, VCAP_BIT_1); @@ -1131,6 +1143,7 @@ static void vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_AF_POLICE_ENA, af->ctrl.action); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_BIT, af->ctrl.type); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x1, af->data.u1.value); + vcap_free_caf(rule); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rule->actionfields); ret = vcap_rule_add_action_bit(rule, VCAP_AF_POLICE_ENA, VCAP_BIT_ANY); @@ -1142,6 +1155,7 @@ static void vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_AF_POLICE_ENA, af->ctrl.action); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_BIT, af->ctrl.type); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x0, af->data.u1.value); + vcap_free_caf(rule); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rule->actionfields); ret = vcap_rule_add_action_u32(rule, VCAP_AF_TYPE, 0x98765432); @@ -1153,6 +1167,7 @@ static void vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_AF_TYPE, af->ctrl.action); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_U32, af->ctrl.type); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x98765432, af->data.u32.value); + vcap_free_caf(rule); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rule->actionfields); ret = vcap_rule_add_action_u32(rule, VCAP_AF_MASK_MODE, 0xaabbccdd); @@ -1164,6 +1179,7 @@ static void vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_AF_MASK_MODE, af->ctrl.action); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_U32, af->ctrl.type); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0xaabbccdd, af->data.u32.value); + vcap_free_caf(rule); } static void vcap_api_rule_find_keyset_basic_test(struct kunit *test)