diff mbox series

[net,v3,3/5] net: microchip: sparx5: Fix possible memory leak in vcap_api_encode_rule_test()

Message ID 20230912110310.1540474-4-ruanjinjie@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series net: microchip: sparx5: Fix some memory leaks in vcap_api_kunit | expand

Commit Message

Jinjie Ruan Sept. 12, 2023, 11:03 a.m. UTC 
Inject fault while probing kunit-example-test.ko, the duprule which
is allocated in vcap_dup_rule() and the vcap enabled port which
is allocated in vcap_enable() of vcap_enable_lookups in
vcap_api_encode_rule_test() is not freed, and it cause the memory
leaks below.

Use vcap_enable_lookups() with false arg to free the vcap enabled
port as other drivers do it. And use vcap_del_rule() to
free the duprule.

unreferenced object 0xffff677a0278bb00 (size 64):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 388, jiffies 4294895987 (age 1101.840s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    18 bd a5 82 00 80 ff ff 18 bd a5 82 00 80 ff ff  ................
    40 fe c8 0e be c6 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  @...............
  backtrace:
    [<000000007d53023a>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<0000000076e3f654>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000034d76721>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<00000000013380a5>] vcap_enable_lookups+0x1c8/0x70c
    [<00000000bbec496b>] vcap_api_encode_rule_test+0x2f8/0xb18
    [<000000002c2bfb7b>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000ff74642b>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<000000004af845ca>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<0000000038a000ca>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff677a027803c0 (size 192):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 388, jiffies 4294895988 (age 1101.836s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    00 12 7a 00 05 00 00 00 0a 00 00 00 64 00 00 00  ..z.........d...
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 d8 03 78 02 7a 67 ff ff  ..........x.zg..
  backtrace:
    [<000000007d53023a>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<0000000076e3f654>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000034d76721>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<00000000c1010131>] vcap_dup_rule+0x34/0x14c
    [<00000000d43c54a4>] vcap_add_rule+0x29c/0x32c
    [<0000000073f1c26d>] vcap_api_encode_rule_test+0x304/0xb18
    [<000000002c2bfb7b>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000ff74642b>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<000000004af845ca>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<0000000038a000ca>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

Fixes: c956b9b318d9 ("net: microchip: sparx5: Adding KUNIT tests of key/action values in VCAP API")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
---
v3:
- Update the commit message, "export" -> "vcap enabled port"
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
index f268383a7570..8c61a5dbce55 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
@@ -1439,6 +1439,10 @@  static void vcap_api_encode_rule_test(struct kunit *test)
 	ret = list_empty(&is2_admin.rules);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, false, ret);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+	vcap_enable_lookups(&test_vctrl, &test_netdev, 0, 0,
+			    rule->cookie, false);
+
 	vcap_free_rule(rule);
 
 	/* Check that the rule has been freed: tricky to access since this
@@ -1449,6 +1453,8 @@  static void vcap_api_encode_rule_test(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, true, ret);
 	ret = list_empty(&rule->actionfields);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, true, ret);
+
+	vcap_del_rule(&test_vctrl, &test_netdev, id);
 }
 
 static void vcap_api_set_rule_counter_test(struct kunit *test)