diff mbox series

[v11,2/3] sched/fair: Scan cluster before scanning LLC in wake-up path

Message ID 20231019033323.54147-3-yangyicong@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series sched/fair: Scan cluster before scanning LLC in wake-up path | expand

Commit Message

Yicong Yang Oct. 19, 2023, 3:33 a.m. UTC 
From: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>

For platforms having clusters like Kunpeng920, CPUs within the same cluster
have lower latency when synchronizing and accessing shared resources like
cache. Thus, this patch tries to find an idle cpu within the cluster of the
target CPU before scanning the whole LLC to gain lower latency. This
will be implemented in 2 steps in select_idle_sibling():
1. When the prev_cpu/recent_used_cpu are good wakeup candidates, use them
   if they're sharing cluster with the target CPU. Otherwise trying to
   scan for an idle CPU in the target's cluster.
2. Scanning the cluster prior to the LLC of the target CPU for an
   idle CPU to wakeup.

Testing has been done on Kunpeng920 by pinning tasks to one numa and two
numa. On Kunpeng920, Each numa has 8 clusters and each cluster has 4 CPUs.

With this patch, We noticed enhancement on tbench and netperf within one
numa or cross two numa on top of tip-sched-core commit
9b46f1abc6d4 ("sched/debug: Print 'tgid' in sched_show_task()")

tbench results (node 0):
            baseline                     patched
  1:        327.2833        372.4623 (   13.80%)
  4:       1320.5933       1479.8833 (   12.06%)
  8:       2638.4867       2921.5267 (   10.73%)
 16:       5282.7133       5891.5633 (   11.53%)
 32:       9810.6733       9877.3400 (    0.68%)
 64:       7408.9367       7447.9900 (    0.53%)
128:       6203.2600       6191.6500 (   -0.19%)
tbench results (node 0-1):
            baseline                     patched
  1:        332.0433        372.7223 (   12.25%)
  4:       1325.4667       1477.6733 (   11.48%)
  8:       2622.9433       2897.9967 (   10.49%)
 16:       5218.6100       5878.2967 (   12.64%)
 32:      10211.7000      11494.4000 (   12.56%)
 64:      13313.7333      16740.0333 (   25.74%)
128:      13959.1000      14533.9000 (    4.12%)

netperf results TCP_RR (node 0):
            baseline                     patched
  1:      76546.5033      90649.9867 (   18.42%)
  4:      77292.4450      90932.7175 (   17.65%)
  8:      77367.7254      90882.3467 (   17.47%)
 16:      78519.9048      90938.8344 (   15.82%)
 32:      72169.5035      72851.6730 (    0.95%)
 64:      25911.2457      25882.2315 (   -0.11%)
128:      10752.6572      10768.6038 (    0.15%)

netperf results TCP_RR (node 0-1):
            baseline                     patched
  1:      76857.6667      90892.2767 (   18.26%)
  4:      78236.6475      90767.3017 (   16.02%)
  8:      77929.6096      90684.1633 (   16.37%)
 16:      77438.5873      90502.5787 (   16.87%)
 32:      74205.6635      88301.5612 (   19.00%)
 64:      69827.8535      71787.6706 (    2.81%)
128:      25281.4366      25771.3023 (    1.94%)

netperf results UDP_RR (node 0):
            baseline                     patched
  1:      96869.8400     110800.8467 (   14.38%)
  4:      97744.9750     109680.5425 (   12.21%)
  8:      98783.9863     110409.9637 (   11.77%)
 16:      99575.0235     110636.2435 (   11.11%)
 32:      95044.7250      97622.8887 (    2.71%)
 64:      32925.2146      32644.4991 (   -0.85%)
128:      12859.2343      12824.0051 (   -0.27%)

netperf results UDP_RR (node 0-1):
            baseline                     patched
  1:      97202.4733     110190.1200 (   13.36%)
  4:      95954.0558     106245.7258 (   10.73%)
  8:      96277.1958     105206.5304 (    9.27%)
 16:      97692.7810     107927.2125 (   10.48%)
 32:      79999.6702     103550.2999 (   29.44%)
 64:      80592.7413      87284.0856 (    8.30%)
128:      27701.5770      29914.5820 (    7.99%)

Note neither Kunpeng920 nor x86 Jacobsville supports SMT, so the SMT branch
in the code has not been tested but it supposed to work.

Chen Yu also noticed this will improve the performance of tbench and
netperf on a 24 CPUs Jacobsville machine, there are 4 CPUs in one
cluster sharing L2 Cache.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
[https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Ytfjs+m1kUs0ScSn@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net]
Tested-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c     | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 kernel/sched/sched.h    |  1 +
 kernel/sched/topology.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Peter Zijlstra Oct. 20, 2023, 1:41 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 11:33:22AM +0800, Yicong Yang wrote:

> @@ -7349,8 +7373,13 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
>  	 */
>  	if (prev != target && cpus_share_cache(prev, target) &&
>  	    (available_idle_cpu(prev) || sched_idle_cpu(prev)) &&
> -	    asym_fits_cpu(task_util, util_min, util_max, prev))
> -		return prev;
> +	    asym_fits_cpu(task_util, util_min, util_max, prev)) {
> +		if (!static_branch_unlikely(&sched_cluster_active))
> +			return prev;
> +
> +		if (cpus_share_resources(prev, target))
> +			return prev;
> +	}
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Allow a per-cpu kthread to stack with the wakee if the
> @@ -7377,7 +7406,11 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
>  	    (available_idle_cpu(recent_used_cpu) || sched_idle_cpu(recent_used_cpu)) &&
>  	    cpumask_test_cpu(recent_used_cpu, p->cpus_ptr) &&
>  	    asym_fits_cpu(task_util, util_min, util_max, recent_used_cpu)) {
> -		return recent_used_cpu;
> +		if (!static_branch_unlikely(&sched_cluster_active))
> +			return recent_used_cpu;
> +
> +		if (cpus_share_resources(recent_used_cpu, target))
> +			return recent_used_cpu;
>  	}
>  
>  	/*

I've changed those like so:


--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7420,10 +7420,9 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct ta
 	if (prev != target && cpus_share_cache(prev, target) &&
 	    (available_idle_cpu(prev) || sched_idle_cpu(prev)) &&
 	    asym_fits_cpu(task_util, util_min, util_max, prev)) {
-		if (!static_branch_unlikely(&sched_cluster_active))
-			return prev;
 
-		if (cpus_share_resources(prev, target))
+		if (!static_branch_unlikely(&sched_cluster_active) ||
+		    cpus_share_resources(prev, target))
 			return prev;
 	}
 
@@ -7452,11 +7451,11 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct ta
 	    (available_idle_cpu(recent_used_cpu) || sched_idle_cpu(recent_used_cpu)) &&
 	    cpumask_test_cpu(recent_used_cpu, p->cpus_ptr) &&
 	    asym_fits_cpu(task_util, util_min, util_max, recent_used_cpu)) {
-		if (!static_branch_unlikely(&sched_cluster_active))
-			return recent_used_cpu;
 
-		if (cpus_share_resources(recent_used_cpu, target))
+		if (!static_branch_unlikely(&sched_cluster_active) ||
+		    cpus_share_resources(recent_used_cpu, target))
 			return recent_used_cpu;
+
 	}
 
 	/*
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 9ae2208089e4..02d842df5294 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7213,6 +7213,30 @@  static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (static_branch_unlikely(&sched_cluster_active)) {
+		struct sched_group *sg = sd->groups;
+
+		if (sg->flags & SD_CLUSTER) {
+			for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, sched_group_span(sg), target + 1) {
+				if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpus))
+					continue;
+
+				if (has_idle_core) {
+					i = select_idle_core(p, cpu, cpus, &idle_cpu);
+					if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
+						return i;
+				} else {
+					if (--nr <= 0)
+						return -1;
+					idle_cpu = __select_idle_cpu(cpu, p);
+					if ((unsigned int)idle_cpu < nr_cpumask_bits)
+						return idle_cpu;
+				}
+			}
+			cpumask_andnot(cpus, cpus, sched_group_span(sg));
+		}
+	}
+
 	for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target + 1) {
 		if (has_idle_core) {
 			i = select_idle_core(p, cpu, cpus, &idle_cpu);
@@ -7220,7 +7244,7 @@  static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
 				return i;
 
 		} else {
-			if (!--nr)
+			if (--nr <= 0)
 				return -1;
 			idle_cpu = __select_idle_cpu(cpu, p);
 			if ((unsigned int)idle_cpu < nr_cpumask_bits)
@@ -7349,8 +7373,13 @@  static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
 	 */
 	if (prev != target && cpus_share_cache(prev, target) &&
 	    (available_idle_cpu(prev) || sched_idle_cpu(prev)) &&
-	    asym_fits_cpu(task_util, util_min, util_max, prev))
-		return prev;
+	    asym_fits_cpu(task_util, util_min, util_max, prev)) {
+		if (!static_branch_unlikely(&sched_cluster_active))
+			return prev;
+
+		if (cpus_share_resources(prev, target))
+			return prev;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Allow a per-cpu kthread to stack with the wakee if the
@@ -7377,7 +7406,11 @@  static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
 	    (available_idle_cpu(recent_used_cpu) || sched_idle_cpu(recent_used_cpu)) &&
 	    cpumask_test_cpu(recent_used_cpu, p->cpus_ptr) &&
 	    asym_fits_cpu(task_util, util_min, util_max, recent_used_cpu)) {
-		return recent_used_cpu;
+		if (!static_branch_unlikely(&sched_cluster_active))
+			return recent_used_cpu;
+
+		if (cpus_share_resources(recent_used_cpu, target))
+			return recent_used_cpu;
 	}
 
 	/*
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 998f03d02de0..ef4fe7bcf740 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1859,6 +1859,7 @@  DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_numa);
 DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_asym_packing);
 DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_asym_cpucapacity);
 extern struct static_key_false sched_asym_cpucapacity;
+extern struct static_key_false sched_cluster_active;
 
 static __always_inline bool sched_asym_cpucap_active(void)
 {
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index dbb8c328e8ad..10d1391e7416 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -673,7 +673,9 @@  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain_shared __rcu *, sd_llc_shared);
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_numa);
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_asym_packing);
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_asym_cpucapacity);
+
 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_asym_cpucapacity);
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_cluster_active);
 
 static void update_top_cache_domain(int cpu)
 {
@@ -2386,6 +2388,7 @@  build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *att
 	struct rq *rq = NULL;
 	int i, ret = -ENOMEM;
 	bool has_asym = false;
+	bool has_cluster = false;
 
 	if (WARN_ON(cpumask_empty(cpu_map)))
 		goto error;
@@ -2514,12 +2517,18 @@  build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *att
 			WRITE_ONCE(d.rd->max_cpu_capacity, capacity);
 
 		cpu_attach_domain(sd, d.rd, i);
+
+		if (lowest_flag_domain(i, SD_CLUSTER))
+			has_cluster = true;
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	if (has_asym)
 		static_branch_inc_cpuslocked(&sched_asym_cpucapacity);
 
+	if (has_cluster)
+		static_branch_inc_cpuslocked(&sched_cluster_active);
+
 	if (rq && sched_debug_verbose) {
 		pr_info("root domain span: %*pbl (max cpu_capacity = %lu)\n",
 			cpumask_pr_args(cpu_map), rq->rd->max_cpu_capacity);
@@ -2619,6 +2628,9 @@  static void detach_destroy_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
 	if (rcu_access_pointer(per_cpu(sd_asym_cpucapacity, cpu)))
 		static_branch_dec_cpuslocked(&sched_asym_cpucapacity);
 
+	if (static_branch_unlikely(&sched_cluster_active))
+		static_branch_dec_cpuslocked(&sched_cluster_active);
+
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	for_each_cpu(i, cpu_map)
 		cpu_attach_domain(NULL, &def_root_domain, i);