Message ID | 20231117-rk-lvds-defer-msg-v1-1-1e6894cf9a74@theobroma-systems.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | drm/rockchip: lvds: do not print error message when deferring probe | expand |
Hi Quentin, On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 3:31 PM Quentin Schulz <foss+kernel@0leil.net> wrote: > > From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com> > > This scary message may happen if the panel or bridge is not probed > before the LVDS controller is, resulting in some head scratching because > the LVDS panel is actually working, since a later try will eventually > find the panel or bridge. > > Therefore let's demote this error message into a debug message to not > scare users unnecessarily. ... > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c > index f0f47e9abf5a..52e2ce2a61a8 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c > @@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static int rockchip_lvds_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, > ret = -EINVAL; > goto err_put_port; > } else if (ret) { > - DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "failed to find panel and bridge node\n"); > + DRM_DEV_DEBUG(dev, "failed to find panel and bridge node\n"); > ret = -EPROBE_DEFER; What about using dev_err_probe() instead?
Hi Fabio, On 11/17/23 20:27, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Quentin, > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 3:31 PM Quentin Schulz <foss+kernel@0leil.net> wrote: >> >> From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com> >> >> This scary message may happen if the panel or bridge is not probed >> before the LVDS controller is, resulting in some head scratching because >> the LVDS panel is actually working, since a later try will eventually >> find the panel or bridge. >> >> Therefore let's demote this error message into a debug message to not >> scare users unnecessarily. > ... > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c >> index f0f47e9abf5a..52e2ce2a61a8 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c >> @@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static int rockchip_lvds_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, >> ret = -EINVAL; >> goto err_put_port; >> } else if (ret) { >> - DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "failed to find panel and bridge node\n"); >> + DRM_DEV_DEBUG(dev, "failed to find panel and bridge node\n"); >> ret = -EPROBE_DEFER; > > What about using dev_err_probe() instead? Either is fine by me, will send a v2 and DRM maintainers can decide for themselves before merging :) Cheers, Quentin
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c index f0f47e9abf5a..52e2ce2a61a8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c @@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static int rockchip_lvds_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, ret = -EINVAL; goto err_put_port; } else if (ret) { - DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "failed to find panel and bridge node\n"); + DRM_DEV_DEBUG(dev, "failed to find panel and bridge node\n"); ret = -EPROBE_DEFER; goto err_put_port; }