From patchwork Thu Jan 25 16:42:27 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Alexandru Elisei X-Patchwork-Id: 13531393 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C9ABC4828C for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:45:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=JA4BAVu2kmkadpMR1NyjpKqgYsxk6rvdgV3huWT1HGQ=; b=boyQOpqp2xWURJ 1BcMK7UIXvMEPfP4GMDSCSxhi3v2V3oB9OHELdiiMD137hcEmZXnk+tplfZnc49hScCE+Gl4zt+mb 7+/anhzIdGlj0K1heLrfba6I3bs+/ghK7aM3NUwdmrAb2ib6pnE4xxBKtzPmYHl4ExgBaE3Mrr907 pRmSPuXSf5OMO2PP0QkZdhjt7/ZXNrYAIlOyAQZr4kUGVJZRkRK9XToFHBXwxjawcz9FPc5r8oEg8 /wxnD42eGb+sDMCvZgLXBY1Ajj7+K54q99rER5ObmyQtiD7EBnqQ7qjqT/LEkc0ALKzhrjIM/Wiz6 tJfh6L+STl65YlvCqnxA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rT2qY-00000000tHS-3vSY; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:44:58 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rT2p0-00000000s7M-3T5w for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:43:25 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BBFC150C; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 08:44:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from e121798.cable.virginm.net (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BDCC3F5A1; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 08:43:16 -0800 (PST) From: Alexandru Elisei To: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, maz@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com, arnd@arndb.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, mhiramat@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, hughd@google.com Cc: pcc@google.com, steven.price@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, david@redhat.com, eugenis@google.com, kcc@google.com, hyesoo.yu@samsung.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH RFC v3 06/35] mm: cma: Make CMA_ALLOC_SUCCESS/FAIL count the number of pages Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:42:27 +0000 Message-Id: <20240125164256.4147-7-alexandru.elisei@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240125164256.4147-1-alexandru.elisei@arm.com> References: <20240125164256.4147-1-alexandru.elisei@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240125_084323_069073_9369CE38 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.45 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The CMA_ALLOC_SUCCESS, respectively CMA_ALLOC_FAIL, are increased by one after each cma_alloc() function call. This is done even though cma_alloc() can allocate an arbitrary number of CMA pages. When looking at /proc/vmstat, the number of successful (or failed) cma_alloc() calls doesn't tell much with regards to how many CMA pages were allocated via cma_alloc() versus via the page allocator (regular allocation request or PCP lists refill). This can also be rather confusing to a user who isn't familiar with the code, since the unit of measurement for nr_free_cma is the number of pages, but cma_alloc_success and cma_alloc_fail count the number of cma_alloc() function calls. Let's make this consistent, and arguably more useful, by having CMA_ALLOC_SUCCESS count the number of successfully allocated CMA pages, and CMA_ALLOC_FAIL count the number of pages the cma_alloc() failed to allocate. For users that wish to track the number of cma_alloc() calls, there are tracepoints for that already implemented. Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei --- mm/cma.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/cma.c b/mm/cma.c index f49c95f8ee37..dbf7fe8cb1bd 100644 --- a/mm/cma.c +++ b/mm/cma.c @@ -517,10 +517,10 @@ struct page *cma_alloc(struct cma *cma, unsigned long count, pr_debug("%s(): returned %p\n", __func__, page); out: if (page) { - count_vm_event(CMA_ALLOC_SUCCESS); + count_vm_events(CMA_ALLOC_SUCCESS, count); cma_sysfs_account_success_pages(cma, count); } else { - count_vm_event(CMA_ALLOC_FAIL); + count_vm_events(CMA_ALLOC_FAIL, count); if (cma) cma_sysfs_account_fail_pages(cma, count); }