diff mbox series

[v4,1/1] arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: add rtc PCF2131 support

Message ID 20240417031455.3177778-2-joy.zou@nxp.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series Add rtc PCF2131 support | expand

Commit Message

Joy Zou April 17, 2024, 3:14 a.m. UTC
Support rtc PCF2131 on imx93-11x11-evk.

Signed-off-by: Joy Zou <joy.zou@nxp.com>
---
Changes in v4:
1. remove the sleep from the pinctrl-names.

Changes in v3:
1.adjust the indentation.

Changes in v2:
1. remove unnecessary status property.
---
 .../boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts    | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)

Comments

Fabio Estevam April 17, 2024, 3:09 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 12:07 AM Joy Zou <joy.zou@nxp.com> wrote:
>
> Support rtc PCF2131 on imx93-11x11-evk.

s/rtc/RTC

> +&lpi2c3 {
> +       #address-cells = <1>;
> +       #size-cells = <0>;
> +       clock-frequency = <400000>;
> +       pinctrl-names = "default";
> +       pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_lpi2c3>;
> +       pinctrl-1 = <&pinctrl_lpi2c3>;

Why is the pinctrl-1 still here?
Joy Zou April 17, 2024, 3:26 a.m. UTC | #2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
> Sent: 2024年4月17日 11:10
> To: Joy Zou <joy.zou@nxp.com>
> Cc: m.felsch@pengutronix.de; Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com>; Jacky Bai
> <ping.bai@nxp.com>; robh+dt@kernel.org;
> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org; conor+dt@kernel.org;
> shawnguo@kernel.org; s.hauer@pengutronix.de; kernel@pengutronix.de;
> dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>; devicetree@vger.kernel.org;
> imx@lists.linux.dev; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: add rtc
> PCF2131 support
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 12:07 AM Joy Zou <joy.zou@nxp.com> wrote:
> >
> > Support rtc PCF2131 on imx93-11x11-evk.
> 
> s/rtc/RTC
Thanks for your comments!
Will change the format in next version.
> 
> > +&lpi2c3 {
> > +       #address-cells = <1>;
> > +       #size-cells = <0>;
> > +       clock-frequency = <400000>;
> > +       pinctrl-names = "default";
> > +       pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_lpi2c3>;
> > +       pinctrl-1 = <&pinctrl_lpi2c3>;
> 
> Why is the pinctrl-1 still here?
Yeah, Sorry for forgetting to delete the pinctrl-1, will delete in next version. 

BR
Joy Zou
Marco Felsch April 17, 2024, 4:57 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Joy,

On 24-04-17, Joy Zou wrote:
> Support rtc PCF2131 on imx93-11x11-evk.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joy Zou <joy.zou@nxp.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> 1. remove the sleep from the pinctrl-names.
> 
> Changes in v3:
> 1.adjust the indentation.
> 
> Changes in v2:
> 1. remove unnecessary status property.
> ---
>  .../boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts    | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> index 07e85a30a25f..bc3c9271d747 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> @@ -281,6 +281,23 @@ ldo5: LDO5 {
>  	};
>  };
>  
> +&lpi2c3 {
> +	#address-cells = <1>;
> +	#size-cells = <0>;

while reading your patch I also noticed that you had to specify these
cells here. It is very common to specify it within the base dtsi file
imx93.dtsi. Can you please provde an extra patch which adds this to the
base dtsi followed by this patch, which of course do need to specify it
again.

Thanks you,
  Marco

> +	clock-frequency = <400000>;
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_lpi2c3>;
> +	pinctrl-1 = <&pinctrl_lpi2c3>;
> +	status = "okay";
> +
> +	pcf2131: rtc@53 {
> +		compatible = "nxp,pcf2131";
> +		reg = <0x53>;
> +		interrupt-parent = <&pcal6524>;
> +		interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
> +	};
> +};
> +
>  &iomuxc {
>  	pinctrl_eqos: eqosgrp {
>  		fsl,pins = <
> @@ -343,6 +360,13 @@ MX93_PAD_I2C2_SDA__LPI2C2_SDA			0x40000b9e
>  		>;
>  	};
>  
> +	pinctrl_lpi2c3: lpi2c3grp {
> +		fsl,pins = <
> +			MX93_PAD_GPIO_IO28__LPI2C3_SDA			0x40000b9e
> +			MX93_PAD_GPIO_IO29__LPI2C3_SCL			0x40000b9e
> +		>;
> +	};
> +
>  	pinctrl_pcal6524: pcal6524grp {
>  		fsl,pins = <
>  			MX93_PAD_CCM_CLKO2__GPIO3_IO27			0x31e
> -- 
> 2.37.1
> 
>
Joy Zou April 24, 2024, 2:28 a.m. UTC | #4
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
> Sent: 2024年4月17日 12:57
> To: Joy Zou <joy.zou@nxp.com>
> Cc: Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com>; Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>;
> robh+dt@kernel.org; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org;
> conor+dt@kernel.org; shawnguo@kernel.org; s.hauer@pengutronix.de;
> kernel@pengutronix.de; festevam@gmail.com; dl-linux-imx
> <linux-imx@nxp.com>; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; imx@lists.linux.dev;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: add rtc
> PCF2131 support
> 
> 
> Hi Joy,
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > index 07e85a30a25f..bc3c9271d747 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > @@ -281,6 +281,23 @@ ldo5: LDO5 {
> >       };
> >  };
> >
> > +&lpi2c3 {
> > +     #address-cells = <1>;
> > +     #size-cells = <0>;
> 
> while reading your patch I also noticed that you had to specify these cells
> here. It is very common to specify it within the base dtsi file imx93.dtsi. Can
> you please provde an extra patch which adds this to the base dtsi followed by
> this patch, which of course do need to specify it again.
> 
> Thanks you,
>   Marco
> 
Thanks for your comments!
Have checked the base dtsi file imx93.dtsi. The these cells already existed.
The current cells is same with the lpi2c3 node in imx93.dtsi. So should remove
these cells in order to keep terse?
BR
Joy Zou
Marco Felsch April 24, 2024, 8:59 a.m. UTC | #5
On 24-04-24, Joy Zou wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
> > Sent: 2024年4月17日 12:57
> > To: Joy Zou <joy.zou@nxp.com>
> > Cc: Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com>; Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>;
> > robh+dt@kernel.org; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org;
> > conor+dt@kernel.org; shawnguo@kernel.org; s.hauer@pengutronix.de;
> > kernel@pengutronix.de; festevam@gmail.com; dl-linux-imx
> > <linux-imx@nxp.com>; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; imx@lists.linux.dev;
> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: add rtc
> > PCF2131 support
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Joy,
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > > index 07e85a30a25f..bc3c9271d747 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > > @@ -281,6 +281,23 @@ ldo5: LDO5 {
> > >       };
> > >  };
> > >
> > > +&lpi2c3 {
> > > +     #address-cells = <1>;
> > > +     #size-cells = <0>;
> > 
> > while reading your patch I also noticed that you had to specify these cells
> > here. It is very common to specify it within the base dtsi file imx93.dtsi. Can
> > you please provde an extra patch which adds this to the base dtsi followed by
> > this patch, which of course do need to specify it again.
> > 
> > Thanks you,
> >   Marco
> > 
> Thanks for your comments!
> Have checked the base dtsi file imx93.dtsi. The these cells already existed.

You're right, not sure why I didn't saw it in the first place.

> The current cells is same with the lpi2c3 node in imx93.dtsi. So should remove
> these cells in order to keep terse?

Yes please remove it.

Regards,
  Marco
Joy Zou April 24, 2024, 9:04 a.m. UTC | #6
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
> Sent: 2024年4月24日 17:00
> To: Joy Zou <joy.zou@nxp.com>
> Cc: Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com>; Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>;
> robh+dt@kernel.org; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org;
> conor+dt@kernel.org; shawnguo@kernel.org; s.hauer@pengutronix.de;
> kernel@pengutronix.de; festevam@gmail.com; dl-linux-imx
> <linux-imx@nxp.com>; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; imx@lists.linux.dev;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: add rtc
> PCF2131 support
> 
> On 24-04-24, Joy Zou wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > > > index 07e85a30a25f..bc3c9271d747 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > > > @@ -281,6 +281,23 @@ ldo5: LDO5 {
> > > >       };
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > > > +&lpi2c3 {
> > > > +     #address-cells = <1>;
> > > > +     #size-cells = <0>;
> > >
> > > while reading your patch I also noticed that you had to specify
> > > these cells here. It is very common to specify it within the base
> > > dtsi file imx93.dtsi. Can you please provde an extra patch which
> > > adds this to the base dtsi followed by this patch, which of course do need
> to specify it again.
> > >
> > > Thanks you,
> > >   Marco
> > >
> > Thanks for your comments!
> > Have checked the base dtsi file imx93.dtsi. The these cells already existed.
> 
> You're right, not sure why I didn't saw it in the first place.
> 
> > The current cells is same with the lpi2c3 node in imx93.dtsi. So
> > should remove these cells in order to keep terse?
> 
> Yes please remove it.
> 
> Regards,
>   Marco

Thanks for your comments!
Will change it in next version.
BR
Joy Zou
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
index 07e85a30a25f..bc3c9271d747 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
@@ -281,6 +281,23 @@  ldo5: LDO5 {
 	};
 };
 
+&lpi2c3 {
+	#address-cells = <1>;
+	#size-cells = <0>;
+	clock-frequency = <400000>;
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_lpi2c3>;
+	pinctrl-1 = <&pinctrl_lpi2c3>;
+	status = "okay";
+
+	pcf2131: rtc@53 {
+		compatible = "nxp,pcf2131";
+		reg = <0x53>;
+		interrupt-parent = <&pcal6524>;
+		interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+	};
+};
+
 &iomuxc {
 	pinctrl_eqos: eqosgrp {
 		fsl,pins = <
@@ -343,6 +360,13 @@  MX93_PAD_I2C2_SDA__LPI2C2_SDA			0x40000b9e
 		>;
 	};
 
+	pinctrl_lpi2c3: lpi2c3grp {
+		fsl,pins = <
+			MX93_PAD_GPIO_IO28__LPI2C3_SDA			0x40000b9e
+			MX93_PAD_GPIO_IO29__LPI2C3_SCL			0x40000b9e
+		>;
+	};
+
 	pinctrl_pcal6524: pcal6524grp {
 		fsl,pins = <
 			MX93_PAD_CCM_CLKO2__GPIO3_IO27			0x31e