| Message ID | 20240729035958.1957185-1-haibo1.xu@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | ACPI: NUMA: initialize all values of acpi_early_node_map to NUMA_NO_NODE | expand |
On 7/29/24 09:29, Haibo Xu wrote: > Currently, only acpi_early_node_map[0] was initialized to NUMA_NO_NODE. > To ensure all the values were properly initialized, switch to initialize > all of them to NUMA_NO_NODE. > > Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> (arm64 platform) > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 2 +- > arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c > index 0c036a9a3c33..2465f291c7e1 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ > > #include <asm/numa.h> > > -static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { NUMA_NO_NODE }; > +static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = NUMA_NO_NODE }; > > int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu) > { > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c > index 0231482d6946..ff95aeebee3e 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c > @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ > > #include <asm/numa.h> > > -static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { NUMA_NO_NODE }; > +static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = NUMA_NO_NODE }; > > int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu) > {
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 11:59:55AM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote: > Currently, only acpi_early_node_map[0] was initialized to NUMA_NO_NODE. > To ensure all the values were properly initialized, switch to initialize > all of them to NUMA_NO_NODE. > > Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com> > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 2 +- > arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c > index 0c036a9a3c33..2465f291c7e1 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ > > #include <asm/numa.h> > > -static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { NUMA_NO_NODE }; > +static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = NUMA_NO_NODE }; > > int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu) > { > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c > index 0231482d6946..ff95aeebee3e 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c > @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ > > #include <asm/numa.h> > > -static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { NUMA_NO_NODE }; > +static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = NUMA_NO_NODE }; > The change looks good to me. However, I was wondering whether it needs "Fixes" tag in which case I think you will have to split this patch into two. Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> Thanks! Sunil > int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu) > { > -- > 2.34.1 >
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 11:59:55AM GMT, Haibo Xu wrote: > Currently, only acpi_early_node_map[0] was initialized to NUMA_NO_NODE. > To ensure all the values were properly initialized, switch to initialize > all of them to NUMA_NO_NODE. > > Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Thanks, but I think Reported-by, or both Reported-by and Suggested-by, is more appropriate. Also, I agree with Sunil that we probably need to split this patch for arm64 and riscv in order to add appropriate Fixes tags. > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com> > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 2 +- > arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c > index 0c036a9a3c33..2465f291c7e1 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ > > #include <asm/numa.h> > > -static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { NUMA_NO_NODE }; > +static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = NUMA_NO_NODE }; > > int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu) > { > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c > index 0231482d6946..ff95aeebee3e 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c > @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ > > #include <asm/numa.h> > > -static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { NUMA_NO_NODE }; > +static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = NUMA_NO_NODE }; > > int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu) > { > -- > 2.34.1 > With the tags additions, Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Thanks, drew
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 11:59:55 +0800, Haibo Xu wrote: > Currently, only acpi_early_node_map[0] was initialized to NUMA_NO_NODE. > To ensure all the values were properly initialized, switch to initialize > all of them to NUMA_NO_NODE. > > Applied arm64 hunk to arm64 (for-next/acpi), thanks! [1/1] ACPI: NUMA: initialize all values of acpi_early_node_map to NUMA_NO_NODE https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/8bb0376fe082 Cheers,
Hello: This patch was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next) by Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>: On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 11:59:55 +0800 you wrote: > Currently, only acpi_early_node_map[0] was initialized to NUMA_NO_NODE. > To ensure all the values were properly initialized, switch to initialize > all of them to NUMA_NO_NODE. > > Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com> > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - ACPI: NUMA: initialize all values of acpi_early_node_map to NUMA_NO_NODE https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/732b177663e1 You are awesome, thank you!
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c index 0c036a9a3c33..2465f291c7e1 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ #include <asm/numa.h> -static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { NUMA_NO_NODE }; +static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = NUMA_NO_NODE }; int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu) { diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c index 0231482d6946..ff95aeebee3e 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ #include <asm/numa.h> -static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { NUMA_NO_NODE }; +static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = NUMA_NO_NODE }; int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu) {
Currently, only acpi_early_node_map[0] was initialized to NUMA_NO_NODE. To ensure all the values were properly initialized, switch to initialize all of them to NUMA_NO_NODE. Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com> --- arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 2 +- arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)