diff mbox series

[v5,02/10] regulator: Move OF-specific regulator lookup code to of_regulator.c

Message ID 20240822092006.3134096-3-wenst@chromium.org (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Headers show
Series platform/chrome: Introduce DT hardware prober | expand

Commit Message

Chen-Yu Tsai Aug. 22, 2024, 9:19 a.m. UTC
There's still a bit of OF-specific code in the regulator device lookup
function.

Move those bits of code over to of_regulator.c, and create a new
function of_regulator_dev_lookup() to encapsulate the code moved out of
regulator_dev_lookup().

Also mark of_find_regulator_by_node() as static, since there are no
other users in other compile units.

There are no functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
---
Changes since v4:
- New patch
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c         |  85 ++------------------------
 drivers/regulator/internal.h     |   9 +--
 drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)

Comments

Andy Shevchenko Aug. 22, 2024, 1:47 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 05:19:55PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> There's still a bit of OF-specific code in the regulator device lookup
> function.
> 
> Move those bits of code over to of_regulator.c, and create a new
> function of_regulator_dev_lookup() to encapsulate the code moved out of
> regulator_dev_lookup().
> 
> Also mark of_find_regulator_by_node() as static, since there are no
> other users in other compile units.
> 
> There are no functional changes.

...

> +/**
> + * of_get_child_regulator - get a child regulator device node
> + * based on supply name
> + * @parent: Parent device node
> + * @prop_name: Combination regulator supply name and "-supply"
> + *
> + * Traverse all child nodes.
> + * Extract the child regulator device node corresponding to the supply name.
> + * returns the device node corresponding to the regulator if found, else
> + * returns NULL.

At the same time you may fix kernel-doc warnings (no "Return" section) in these
three (on your wish you may fix others in a separate change, but it's not
related to this series).

> + */

...

> +/** of_regulator_dev_lookup - lookup a regulator device with device tree only

Something went wrong with the indentation.

> + * @dev: Device pointer for regulator supply lookup.
> + * @supply: Supply name or regulator ID.
> + *
> + * If successful, returns a struct regulator_dev that corresponds to the name
> + * @supply and with the embedded struct device refcount incremented by one.
> + * The refcount must be dropped by calling put_device().
> + * On failure one of the following ERR-PTR-encoded values is returned:
> + * -ENODEV if lookup fails permanently, -EPROBE_DEFER if lookup could succeed
> + * in the future.
> + */
Chen-Yu Tsai Aug. 23, 2024, 6:49 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 9:47 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 05:19:55PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > There's still a bit of OF-specific code in the regulator device lookup
> > function.
> >
> > Move those bits of code over to of_regulator.c, and create a new
> > function of_regulator_dev_lookup() to encapsulate the code moved out of
> > regulator_dev_lookup().
> >
> > Also mark of_find_regulator_by_node() as static, since there are no
> > other users in other compile units.
> >
> > There are no functional changes.
>
> ...
>
> > +/**
> > + * of_get_child_regulator - get a child regulator device node
> > + * based on supply name
> > + * @parent: Parent device node
> > + * @prop_name: Combination regulator supply name and "-supply"
> > + *
> > + * Traverse all child nodes.
> > + * Extract the child regulator device node corresponding to the supply name.
> > + * returns the device node corresponding to the regulator if found, else
> > + * returns NULL.
>
> At the same time you may fix kernel-doc warnings (no "Return" section) in these
> three (on your wish you may fix others in a separate change, but it's not
> related to this series).

As you said some other functions are missing it as well, so I'll do a
patch separate from this series to fix them all.

> > + */
>
> ...
>
> > +/** of_regulator_dev_lookup - lookup a regulator device with device tree only
>
> Something went wrong with the indentation.

Will fix, and also add a "Return" section.


Thanks
ChenYu

> > + * @dev: Device pointer for regulator supply lookup.
> > + * @supply: Supply name or regulator ID.
> > + *
> > + * If successful, returns a struct regulator_dev that corresponds to the name
> > + * @supply and with the embedded struct device refcount incremented by one.
> > + * The refcount must be dropped by calling put_device().
> > + * On failure one of the following ERR-PTR-encoded values is returned:
> > + * -ENODEV if lookup fails permanently, -EPROBE_DEFER if lookup could succeed
> > + * in the future.
> > + */
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
Andy Shevchenko Aug. 23, 2024, 1:43 p.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 02:49:59PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 9:47 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 05:19:55PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:

...

> > > +/**
> > > + * of_get_child_regulator - get a child regulator device node
> > > + * based on supply name
> > > + * @parent: Parent device node
> > > + * @prop_name: Combination regulator supply name and "-supply"
> > > + *
> > > + * Traverse all child nodes.
> > > + * Extract the child regulator device node corresponding to the supply name.
> > > + * returns the device node corresponding to the regulator if found, else
> > > + * returns NULL.
> >
> > At the same time you may fix kernel-doc warnings (no "Return" section) in these
> > three (on your wish you may fix others in a separate change, but it's not
> > related to this series).
> 
> As you said some other functions are missing it as well, so I'll do a
> patch separate from this series to fix them all.

But you need to fix them in this patch series. We do not add patches with known
issues, which are really easy to fix beforehand.

(And below seems you indirectly agrees on that)

> > > + */

...

> > > +/** of_regulator_dev_lookup - lookup a regulator device with device tree only
> >
> > Something went wrong with the indentation.
> 
> Will fix, and also add a "Return" section.

Thank you!

> > > + * @dev: Device pointer for regulator supply lookup.
> > > + * @supply: Supply name or regulator ID.
> > > + *
> > > + * If successful, returns a struct regulator_dev that corresponds to the name
> > > + * @supply and with the embedded struct device refcount incremented by one.
> > > + * The refcount must be dropped by calling put_device().
> > > + * On failure one of the following ERR-PTR-encoded values is returned:
> > > + * -ENODEV if lookup fails permanently, -EPROBE_DEFER if lookup could succeed
> > > + * in the future.
> > > + */
Chen-Yu Tsai Aug. 26, 2024, 6:46 a.m. UTC | #4
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 9:43 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 02:49:59PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 9:47 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 05:19:55PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * of_get_child_regulator - get a child regulator device node
> > > > + * based on supply name
> > > > + * @parent: Parent device node
> > > > + * @prop_name: Combination regulator supply name and "-supply"
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Traverse all child nodes.
> > > > + * Extract the child regulator device node corresponding to the supply name.
> > > > + * returns the device node corresponding to the regulator if found, else
> > > > + * returns NULL.
> > >
> > > At the same time you may fix kernel-doc warnings (no "Return" section) in these
> > > three (on your wish you may fix others in a separate change, but it's not
> > > related to this series).
> >
> > As you said some other functions are missing it as well, so I'll do a
> > patch separate from this series to fix them all.
>
> But you need to fix them in this patch series. We do not add patches with known
> issues, which are really easy to fix beforehand.

I'd say that's a preexisting thing, and code movement shouldn't change it.
But, yeah, I can send another patch fixing up all the kerneldoc issues
in both files.

ChenYu

> (And below seems you indirectly agrees on that)
>
> > > > + */
>
> ...
>
> > > > +/** of_regulator_dev_lookup - lookup a regulator device with device tree only
> > >
> > > Something went wrong with the indentation.
> >
> > Will fix, and also add a "Return" section.
>
> Thank you!
>
> > > > + * @dev: Device pointer for regulator supply lookup.
> > > > + * @supply: Supply name or regulator ID.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * If successful, returns a struct regulator_dev that corresponds to the name
> > > > + * @supply and with the embedded struct device refcount incremented by one.
> > > > + * The refcount must be dropped by calling put_device().
> > > > + * On failure one of the following ERR-PTR-encoded values is returned:
> > > > + * -ENODEV if lookup fails permanently, -EPROBE_DEFER if lookup could succeed
> > > > + * in the future.
> > > > + */
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
kernel test robot Aug. 26, 2024, 12:06 p.m. UTC | #5
Hi Chen-Yu,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on broonie-regulator/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on robh/for-next wsa/i2c/for-next linus/master v6.11-rc5 next-20240823]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Chen-Yu-Tsai/of-dynamic-Add-of_changeset_update_prop_string/20240826-105737
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240822092006.3134096-3-wenst%40chromium.org
patch subject: [PATCH v5 02/10] regulator: Move OF-specific regulator lookup code to of_regulator.c
config: i386-randconfig-005-20240826 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240826/202408261940.R6VmGtGO-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240826/202408261940.R6VmGtGO-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408261940.R6VmGtGO-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from drivers/regulator/helpers.c:17:
   drivers/regulator/internal.h: In function 'of_regulator_dev_lookup':
>> drivers/regulator/internal.h:87:16: warning: returning 'int' from a function with return type 'struct regulator_dev *' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
      87 |         return -ENODEV;
         |                ^


vim +87 drivers/regulator/internal.h

    82	
    83	#else
    84	static inline struct regulator_dev *of_regulator_dev_lookup(struct device *dev,
    85								    const char *supply)
    86	{
  > 87		return -ENODEV;
    88	}
    89
kernel test robot Aug. 26, 2024, 12:06 p.m. UTC | #6
Hi Chen-Yu,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on broonie-regulator/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on robh/for-next wsa/i2c/for-next linus/master v6.11-rc5 next-20240823]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Chen-Yu-Tsai/of-dynamic-Add-of_changeset_update_prop_string/20240826-105737
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240822092006.3134096-3-wenst%40chromium.org
patch subject: [PATCH v5 02/10] regulator: Move OF-specific regulator lookup code to of_regulator.c
config: parisc-randconfig-002-20240826 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240826/202408261956.PHxQEruO-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: hppa-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240826/202408261956.PHxQEruO-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408261956.PHxQEruO-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from drivers/regulator/helpers.c:17:
   drivers/regulator/internal.h: In function 'of_regulator_dev_lookup':
>> drivers/regulator/internal.h:87:16: error: returning 'int' from a function with return type 'struct regulator_dev *' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
      87 |         return -ENODEV;
         |                ^


vim +87 drivers/regulator/internal.h

    82	
    83	#else
    84	static inline struct regulator_dev *of_regulator_dev_lookup(struct device *dev,
    85								    const char *supply)
    86	{
  > 87		return -ENODEV;
    88	}
    89
kernel test robot Aug. 26, 2024, 1:19 p.m. UTC | #7
Hi Chen-Yu,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on broonie-regulator/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on robh/for-next wsa/i2c/for-next linus/master v6.11-rc5 next-20240826]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Chen-Yu-Tsai/of-dynamic-Add-of_changeset_update_prop_string/20240826-105737
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240822092006.3134096-3-wenst%40chromium.org
patch subject: [PATCH v5 02/10] regulator: Move OF-specific regulator lookup code to of_regulator.c
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-003-20240826 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240826/202408262013.YYc4obi2-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 18.1.5 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 617a15a9eac96088ae5e9134248d8236e34b91b1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240826/202408262013.YYc4obi2-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408262013.YYc4obi2-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from drivers/regulator/devres.c:15:
>> drivers/regulator/internal.h:87:9: error: incompatible integer to pointer conversion returning 'int' from a function with result type 'struct regulator_dev *' [-Wint-conversion]
      87 |         return -ENODEV;
         |                ^~~~~~~
   1 error generated.


vim +87 drivers/regulator/internal.h

    82	
    83	#else
    84	static inline struct regulator_dev *of_regulator_dev_lookup(struct device *dev,
    85								    const char *supply)
    86	{
  > 87		return -ENODEV;
    88	}
    89
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 9029de5395ee..361309fcae57 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -419,72 +419,6 @@  static void regulator_lock_dependent(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 	mutex_unlock(&regulator_list_mutex);
 }
 
-/**
- * of_get_child_regulator - get a child regulator device node
- * based on supply name
- * @parent: Parent device node
- * @prop_name: Combination regulator supply name and "-supply"
- *
- * Traverse all child nodes.
- * Extract the child regulator device node corresponding to the supply name.
- * returns the device node corresponding to the regulator if found, else
- * returns NULL.
- */
-static struct device_node *of_get_child_regulator(struct device_node *parent,
-						  const char *prop_name)
-{
-	struct device_node *regnode = NULL;
-	struct device_node *child = NULL;
-
-	for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) {
-		regnode = of_parse_phandle(child, prop_name, 0);
-
-		if (!regnode) {
-			regnode = of_get_child_regulator(child, prop_name);
-			if (regnode)
-				goto err_node_put;
-		} else {
-			goto err_node_put;
-		}
-	}
-	return NULL;
-
-err_node_put:
-	of_node_put(child);
-	return regnode;
-}
-
-/**
- * of_get_regulator - get a regulator device node based on supply name
- * @dev: Device pointer for the consumer (of regulator) device
- * @supply: regulator supply name
- *
- * Extract the regulator device node corresponding to the supply name.
- * returns the device node corresponding to the regulator if found, else
- * returns NULL.
- */
-static struct device_node *of_get_regulator(struct device *dev, const char *supply)
-{
-	struct device_node *regnode = NULL;
-	char prop_name[64]; /* 64 is max size of property name */
-
-	dev_dbg(dev, "Looking up %s-supply from device tree\n", supply);
-
-	snprintf(prop_name, 64, "%s-supply", supply);
-	regnode = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, prop_name, 0);
-
-	if (!regnode) {
-		regnode = of_get_child_regulator(dev->of_node, prop_name);
-		if (regnode)
-			return regnode;
-
-		dev_dbg(dev, "Looking up %s property in node %pOF failed\n",
-				prop_name, dev->of_node);
-		return NULL;
-	}
-	return regnode;
-}
-
 /* Platform voltage constraint check */
 int regulator_check_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 			    int *min_uV, int *max_uV)
@@ -2009,7 +1943,6 @@  static struct regulator_dev *regulator_dev_lookup(struct device *dev,
 						  const char *supply)
 {
 	struct regulator_dev *r = NULL;
-	struct device_node *node;
 	struct regulator_map *map;
 	const char *devname = NULL;
 
@@ -2017,19 +1950,11 @@  static struct regulator_dev *regulator_dev_lookup(struct device *dev,
 
 	/* first do a dt based lookup */
 	if (dev && dev->of_node) {
-		node = of_get_regulator(dev, supply);
-		if (node) {
-			r = of_find_regulator_by_node(node);
-			of_node_put(node);
-			if (r)
-				return r;
-
-			/*
-			 * We have a node, but there is no device.
-			 * assume it has not registered yet.
-			 */
-			return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
-		}
+		r = of_regulator_dev_lookup(dev, supply);
+		if (!IS_ERR(r))
+			return r;
+		if (PTR_ERR(r) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
+			return r;
 	}
 
 	/* if not found, try doing it non-dt way */
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/internal.h b/drivers/regulator/internal.h
index 77a502141089..ffeaef22169e 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/internal.h
+++ b/drivers/regulator/internal.h
@@ -66,7 +66,8 @@  static inline struct regulator_dev *dev_to_rdev(struct device *dev)
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_OF
-struct regulator_dev *of_find_regulator_by_node(struct device_node *np);
+struct regulator_dev *of_regulator_dev_lookup(struct device *dev,
+					      const char *supply);
 struct regulator_init_data *regulator_of_get_init_data(struct device *dev,
 			         const struct regulator_desc *desc,
 				 struct regulator_config *config,
@@ -80,10 +81,10 @@  int of_get_n_coupled(struct regulator_dev *rdev);
 bool of_check_coupling_data(struct regulator_dev *rdev);
 
 #else
-static inline struct regulator_dev *
-of_find_regulator_by_node(struct device_node *np)
+static inline struct regulator_dev *of_regulator_dev_lookup(struct device *dev,
+							    const char *supply)
 {
-	return NULL;
+	return -ENODEV;
 }
 
 static inline struct regulator_init_data *
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c
index d557f7b1ec7c..d924f5c1de59 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c
@@ -550,7 +550,73 @@  struct regulator_init_data *regulator_of_get_init_data(struct device *dev,
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-struct regulator_dev *of_find_regulator_by_node(struct device_node *np)
+/**
+ * of_get_child_regulator - get a child regulator device node
+ * based on supply name
+ * @parent: Parent device node
+ * @prop_name: Combination regulator supply name and "-supply"
+ *
+ * Traverse all child nodes.
+ * Extract the child regulator device node corresponding to the supply name.
+ * returns the device node corresponding to the regulator if found, else
+ * returns NULL.
+ */
+static struct device_node *of_get_child_regulator(struct device_node *parent,
+						  const char *prop_name)
+{
+	struct device_node *regnode = NULL;
+	struct device_node *child = NULL;
+
+	for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) {
+		regnode = of_parse_phandle(child, prop_name, 0);
+
+		if (!regnode) {
+			regnode = of_get_child_regulator(child, prop_name);
+			if (regnode)
+				goto err_node_put;
+		} else {
+			goto err_node_put;
+		}
+	}
+	return NULL;
+
+err_node_put:
+	of_node_put(child);
+	return regnode;
+}
+
+/**
+ * of_get_regulator - get a regulator device node based on supply name
+ * @dev: Device pointer for the consumer (of regulator) device
+ * @supply: regulator supply name
+ *
+ * Extract the regulator device node corresponding to the supply name.
+ * returns the device node corresponding to the regulator if found, else
+ * returns NULL.
+ */
+static struct device_node *of_get_regulator(struct device *dev, const char *supply)
+{
+	struct device_node *regnode = NULL;
+	char prop_name[64]; /* 64 is max size of property name */
+
+	dev_dbg(dev, "Looking up %s-supply from device tree\n", supply);
+
+	snprintf(prop_name, 64, "%s-supply", supply);
+	regnode = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, prop_name, 0);
+
+	if (!regnode) {
+		regnode = of_get_child_regulator(dev->of_node, prop_name);
+		if (regnode)
+			return regnode;
+
+		dev_dbg(dev, "Looking up %s property in node %pOF failed\n",
+				prop_name, dev->of_node);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+	return regnode;
+}
+
+static struct regulator_dev *of_find_regulator_by_node(struct device_node *np)
 {
 	struct device *dev;
 
@@ -559,6 +625,40 @@  struct regulator_dev *of_find_regulator_by_node(struct device_node *np)
 	return dev ? dev_to_rdev(dev) : NULL;
 }
 
+/** of_regulator_dev_lookup - lookup a regulator device with device tree only
+ * @dev: Device pointer for regulator supply lookup.
+ * @supply: Supply name or regulator ID.
+ *
+ * If successful, returns a struct regulator_dev that corresponds to the name
+ * @supply and with the embedded struct device refcount incremented by one.
+ * The refcount must be dropped by calling put_device().
+ * On failure one of the following ERR-PTR-encoded values is returned:
+ * -ENODEV if lookup fails permanently, -EPROBE_DEFER if lookup could succeed
+ * in the future.
+ */
+struct regulator_dev *of_regulator_dev_lookup(struct device *dev,
+					      const char *supply)
+{
+	struct regulator_dev *r;
+	struct device_node *node;
+
+	node = of_get_regulator(dev, supply);
+	if (node) {
+		r = of_find_regulator_by_node(node);
+		of_node_put(node);
+		if (r)
+			return r;
+
+		/*
+		 * We have a node, but there is no device.
+		 * assume it has not registered yet.
+		 */
+		return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
+	}
+
+	return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+}
+
 /*
  * Returns number of regulators coupled with rdev.
  */