diff mbox series

[v4,3/9] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-rk3x: Add rk3576 compatible

Message ID 20240903152308.13565-4-detlev.casanova@collabora.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Add device tree for ArmSoM Sige 5 board | expand

Commit Message

Detlev Casanova Sept. 3, 2024, 3:22 p.m. UTC 
Just like RK356x and RK3588, RK3576 is compatible to the existing
rk3399 binding.

Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Andi Shyti Sept. 3, 2024, 3:46 p.m. UTC | #1 
Hi,

On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 11:22:33AM GMT, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> Just like RK356x and RK3588, RK3576 is compatible to the existing
> rk3399 binding.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com>
> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>

I will apply this after 1 and 2 have been merged.

BTW, who is maintaining rockchip.yaml?

Thanks,
Andi

> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml
> index 82b9d6682297..a9dae5b52f28 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ properties:
>                - rockchip,rk3308-i2c
>                - rockchip,rk3328-i2c
>                - rockchip,rk3568-i2c
> +              - rockchip,rk3576-i2c
>                - rockchip,rk3588-i2c
>                - rockchip,rv1126-i2c
>            - const: rockchip,rk3399-i2c
> -- 
> 2.46.0
>
Andi Shyti Sept. 3, 2024, 4:47 p.m. UTC | #2 
Hi,

On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 11:59:34AM GMT, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> On Tuesday, 3 September 2024 11:46:00 EDT Andi Shyti wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 11:22:33AM GMT, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> > > Just like RK356x and RK3588, RK3576 is compatible to the existing
> > > rk3399 binding.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com>
> > > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> > > Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> > 
> > I will apply this after 1 and 2 have been merged.
> 
> Sure, although it is not really dependent on 1 and 2.

yes, but I want to be sure that everything is coming in.

> > BTW, who is maintaining rockchip.yaml?
> 
> Heiko Stuebner is the maintainer of Rockchip SoC support.

I would guess so, but I think we should also add the entry to
the maintainer's file :-)

Thanks,
Andi

> > Thanks,
> > Andi
> > 
> > > ---
> > > 
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml | 1 +
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml index
> > > 82b9d6682297..a9dae5b52f28 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml
> > > 
> > > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ properties:
> > >                - rockchip,rk3308-i2c
> > >                - rockchip,rk3328-i2c
> > >                - rockchip,rk3568-i2c
> > > 
> > > +              - rockchip,rk3576-i2c
> > > 
> > >                - rockchip,rk3588-i2c
> > >                - rockchip,rv1126-i2c
> > >            
> > >            - const: rockchip,rk3399-i2c
> 
> 
> 
>
Andi Shyti Sept. 3, 2024, 6:11 p.m. UTC | #3 
BTW, just as a self reminder,

Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>

Thanks,
Andi

On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 11:22:33AM GMT, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> Just like RK356x and RK3588, RK3576 is compatible to the existing
> rk3399 binding.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com>
> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml
> index 82b9d6682297..a9dae5b52f28 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ properties:
>                - rockchip,rk3308-i2c
>                - rockchip,rk3328-i2c
>                - rockchip,rk3568-i2c
> +              - rockchip,rk3576-i2c
>                - rockchip,rk3588-i2c
>                - rockchip,rv1126-i2c
>            - const: rockchip,rk3399-i2c
> -- 
> 2.46.0
>
Heiko Stübner Sept. 3, 2024, 9:59 p.m. UTC | #4 
Am Dienstag, 3. September 2024, 18:47:17 CEST schrieb Andi Shyti:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 11:59:34AM GMT, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 3 September 2024 11:46:00 EDT Andi Shyti wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 11:22:33AM GMT, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> > > > Just like RK356x and RK3588, RK3576 is compatible to the existing
> > > > rk3399 binding.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> > > > Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> > > 
> > > I will apply this after 1 and 2 have been merged.
> > 
> > Sure, although it is not really dependent on 1 and 2.
> 
> yes, but I want to be sure that everything is coming in.
> 
> > > BTW, who is maintaining rockchip.yaml?
> > 
> > Heiko Stuebner is the maintainer of Rockchip SoC support.
> 
> I would guess so, but I think we should also add the entry to
> the maintainer's file :-)

now you made me doubt the wildcards we have in place ;-)

# scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
[...]
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> (maintainer:ARM/Rockchip SoC support)
[...]
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org (open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support)

So Maintainers seems to be correct ... *phew* :-)
Heiko Stübner Sept. 3, 2024, 10:06 p.m. UTC | #5 
Hi Andi,

Am Dienstag, 3. September 2024, 17:46:00 CEST schrieb Andi Shyti:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 11:22:33AM GMT, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> > Just like RK356x and RK3588, RK3576 is compatible to the existing
> > rk3399 binding.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com>
> > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> > Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> 
> I will apply this after 1 and 2 have been merged.

I picked patch 2 now.

Patch 1 should go together with patch 9, but that will require the other
binding additions from this series.

So if you don't have reservations it would be cool if the i2c binding
could get merged. The i2c controller is part of the rk3576 soc and it
thankfully also is just the same as the rk356x + rk3588 soc variant
as Detlev wrote in the binding.


Thanks a lot
Heiko
Andi Shyti Sept. 3, 2024, 10:20 p.m. UTC | #6 
Hi,

On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 11:22:33AM GMT, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> Just like RK356x and RK3588, RK3576 is compatible to the existing
> rk3399 binding.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com>
> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>

merged to i2c/i2c-host.

Thanks,
Andi
Andi Shyti Sept. 3, 2024, 10:22 p.m. UTC | #7 
Hi Heiko,

On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 11:59:12PM GMT, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 3. September 2024, 18:47:17 CEST schrieb Andi Shyti:
> > On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 11:59:34AM GMT, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 3 September 2024 11:46:00 EDT Andi Shyti wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 11:22:33AM GMT, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> > > > > Just like RK356x and RK3588, RK3576 is compatible to the existing
> > > > > rk3399 binding.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com>
> > > > > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> > > > > Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> > > > 
> > > > I will apply this after 1 and 2 have been merged.
> > > 
> > > Sure, although it is not really dependent on 1 and 2.
> > 
> > yes, but I want to be sure that everything is coming in.
> > 
> > > > BTW, who is maintaining rockchip.yaml?
> > > 
> > > Heiko Stuebner is the maintainer of Rockchip SoC support.
> > 
> > I would guess so, but I think we should also add the entry to
> > the maintainer's file :-)
> 
> now you made me doubt the wildcards we have in place ;-)
> 
> # scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> [...]
> Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> (maintainer:ARM/Rockchip SoC support)
> [...]
> linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org (open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support)
> 
> So Maintainers seems to be correct ... *phew* :-)

Normally I check the MAINTAINERS file where the rockchip.yaml is
not listed. There is an "N: rockchip" under your name, but having
it explicitely stated wouldn't hurt (as it is in other arm/*yaml
file. That's why I got confused at first.

Anyway, sorry for the noise.

Thanks,
Andi
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml
index 82b9d6682297..a9dae5b52f28 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@  properties:
               - rockchip,rk3308-i2c
               - rockchip,rk3328-i2c
               - rockchip,rk3568-i2c
+              - rockchip,rk3576-i2c
               - rockchip,rk3588-i2c
               - rockchip,rv1126-i2c
           - const: rockchip,rk3399-i2c