Message ID | 20240909130832.1203849-1-snehalreddy@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] KVM: arm64: Add memory length checks and remove inline in do_ffa_mem_xfer | expand |
On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 01:08:32PM +0000, Snehal Koukuntla wrote: Hi, A couple of nits which weren't addressed in the first version. > Check size during allocation to fix discrepancy in memory reclaim path. > Currently only happens during memory reclaim, inconsistent with mem_xfer > Also do_ffa_mem_xfer() does not need __always_inline > Please enhance the description in the commit message as Mark suggested previously. Something like this should work: """ When we share memory through FF-A and the description of the buffers exceeds the size of the mapped buffer, the fragmentation API is used. The fragmentation API allows specifying chunks of descriptors in subsequent FF-A fragment calls and no upper limit has been established for this. The entire memory region transferred is identified by a handle which can be used to reclaim the transferred memory. To be able to reclaim the memory, the description of the buffers has to fit in the ffa_desc_buf. Add a bounds check on the FF-A sharing path to prevent the memory reclaim from failing. Fixes: 43609000177625 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Snehal Koukuntla <snehalreddy@google.com> """ Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Sebastian Ene <sebastianene@google.com> > Signed-off-by: Snehal Koukuntla <snehalreddy@google.com> > --- > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c | 7 ++++++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c > index e715c157c2c4..637425f63fd1 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c > @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ static void do_ffa_mem_frag_tx(struct arm_smccc_res *res, > return; > } > > -static __always_inline void do_ffa_mem_xfer(const u64 func_id, > +static void do_ffa_mem_xfer(const u64 func_id, > struct arm_smccc_res *res, > struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt) > { > @@ -461,6 +461,11 @@ static __always_inline void do_ffa_mem_xfer(const u64 func_id, > goto out_unlock; > } > > + if (len > ffa_desc_buf.len) { > + ret = FFA_RET_NO_MEMORY; > + goto out_unlock; > + } > + > buf = hyp_buffers.tx; > memcpy(buf, host_buffers.tx, fraglen); > > -- > 2.46.0.469.g59c65b2a67-goog > Thanks, Seb
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c index e715c157c2c4..637425f63fd1 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ static void do_ffa_mem_frag_tx(struct arm_smccc_res *res, return; } -static __always_inline void do_ffa_mem_xfer(const u64 func_id, +static void do_ffa_mem_xfer(const u64 func_id, struct arm_smccc_res *res, struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt) { @@ -461,6 +461,11 @@ static __always_inline void do_ffa_mem_xfer(const u64 func_id, goto out_unlock; } + if (len > ffa_desc_buf.len) { + ret = FFA_RET_NO_MEMORY; + goto out_unlock; + } + buf = hyp_buffers.tx; memcpy(buf, host_buffers.tx, fraglen);
Check size during allocation to fix discrepancy in memory reclaim path. Currently only happens during memory reclaim, inconsistent with mem_xfer Also do_ffa_mem_xfer() does not need __always_inline Signed-off-by: Snehal Koukuntla <snehalreddy@google.com> --- arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)