Message ID | 20241114142333.18210-1-hardevsinh.palaniya@siliconsignals.io (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] arm64: Refactor conditional logic | expand |
Hi all, > Unnecessarily checks ftr_ovr == tmp in an extra else if, which is not > needed because that condition would already be true by default if the > previous conditions are not satisfied. > > if (ftr_ovr != tmp) { > } else if (ftr_new != tmp) { > } else if (ftr_ovr == tmp) { > > Logic: The first and last conditions are inverses of each other, so > the last condition must be true if the first two conditions are false. > > Additionally, all branches set the variable str, making the subsequent > "if (str)" check redundant > > Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Hardevsinh Palaniya <hardevsinh.palaniya@siliconsignals.io> Please consider this patch as v3. Apologies for the inconvenience. Best regards, Hardev
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index 718728a85430..728709483fb7 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -989,17 +989,16 @@ static void init_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_reg, u64 new) /* Override was valid */ ftr_new = tmp; str = "forced"; - } else if (ftr_ovr == tmp) { + } else { /* Override was the safe value */ str = "already set"; } - if (str) - pr_warn("%s[%d:%d]: %s to %llx\n", - reg->name, - ftrp->shift + ftrp->width - 1, - ftrp->shift, str, - tmp & (BIT(ftrp->width) - 1)); + pr_warn("%s[%d:%d]: %s to %llx\n", + reg->name, + ftrp->shift + ftrp->width - 1, + ftrp->shift, str, + tmp & (BIT(ftrp->width) - 1)); } else if ((ftr_mask & reg->override->val) == ftr_mask) { reg->override->val &= ~ftr_mask; pr_warn("%s[%d:%d]: impossible override, ignored\n",