From patchwork Fri Dec 6 13:55:58 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Beata Michalska X-Patchwork-Id: 13897268 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38EAAE77173 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 14:00:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From: Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=5oguH4lYMS1IXNsJ08mOpb/NV2A4J3zEKBFO+YC/oEE=; b=JmLkQXGmJRlaN0UVkLty2hQerB TSTag7UEAax0y1QKViu5LNHtl9spnjTT7gymKUt2qMixwj/B3/qrs1EZk//8kNq2hbDV/HtE7k0+e RD33weUILcjvNlBN0sB7EwjBTg4p/qKo8QQfFQ9mYsMmmV+NbbACFQV4fKUYhuCzDh7RGbWmvsqMw lOUcdygln5NeEOsVI5D18tQNmpw92DKMug40RLp1iSt1zRaIKOmFdc28YIV4mNVkjpg+74iOyS/3N Tb1ubJcFGBFPogBOuwF7b+5hKTlp6TjHnP0+DWCD3EASbj0uyrNN5wKBt9ecZrcllVFO1XoZVEpZR 2mKVSbTg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tJYsr-00000001oE0-3V0n; Fri, 06 Dec 2024 14:00:41 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tJYp8-00000001nPe-0Tam for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2024 13:56:51 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252BB1474; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 05:57:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from e125905.cambridge.arm.com (e125905.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.73]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 235FB3F7D8; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 05:56:47 -0800 (PST) From: Beata Michalska To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, ionela.voinescu@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org Cc: sumitg@nvidia.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com, vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com, lihuisong@huawei.com, zhanjie9@hisilicon.com Subject: [PATCH v8 2/4] arm64: amu: Delay allocating cpumask for AMU FIE support Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 13:55:58 +0000 Message-Id: <20241206135600.4083965-3-beata.michalska@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20241206135600.4083965-1-beata.michalska@arm.com> References: <20241206135600.4083965-1-beata.michalska@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241206_055650_194879_9A35CF81 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.63 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org For the time being, the amu_fie_cpus cpumask is being exclusively used by the AMU-related internals of FIE support and is guaranteed to be valid on every access currently made. Still the mask is not being invalidated on one of the error handling code paths, which leaves a soft spot with theoretical risk of UAF for CPUMASK_OFFSTACK cases. To make things sound, delay allocating said cpumask (for CPUMASK_OFFSTACK) avoiding otherwise nasty sanitising case failing to register the cpufreq policy notifications. Signed-off-by: Beata Michalska --- arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 22 ++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c index 1a2c72f3e7f8..cb180684d10d 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c @@ -194,12 +194,19 @@ static void amu_fie_setup(const struct cpumask *cpus) int cpu; /* We are already set since the last insmod of cpufreq driver */ - if (unlikely(cpumask_subset(cpus, amu_fie_cpus))) + if (cpumask_available(amu_fie_cpus) && + unlikely(cpumask_subset(cpus, amu_fie_cpus))) return; - for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) { + for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) if (!freq_counters_valid(cpu)) return; + + if (!cpumask_available(amu_fie_cpus) && + !zalloc_cpumask_var(&amu_fie_cpus, GFP_KERNEL)) { + WARN_ONCE(1, "Failed to allocate FIE cpumask for CPUs[%*pbl]\n", + cpumask_pr_args(cpus)); + return; } cpumask_or(amu_fie_cpus, amu_fie_cpus, cpus); @@ -237,17 +244,8 @@ static struct notifier_block init_amu_fie_notifier = { static int __init init_amu_fie(void) { - int ret; - - if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&amu_fie_cpus, GFP_KERNEL)) - return -ENOMEM; - - ret = cpufreq_register_notifier(&init_amu_fie_notifier, + return cpufreq_register_notifier(&init_amu_fie_notifier, CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER); - if (ret) - free_cpumask_var(amu_fie_cpus); - - return ret; } core_initcall(init_amu_fie);