[3/3] RISC-V: KVM: switch to kvm_lock/unlock_all_vcpus

Commit Message

Maxim Levitsky Feb. 11, 2025, 12:09 a.m. UTC

use kvm_lock/unlock_all_vcpus instead of riscv's own
implementation.

Note that this does introduce a slight functional change - now vCPUs are
unlocked in the same order they were locked and not in the opposite order.

Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <[e-mail]>
---
 arch/riscv/kvm/aia_device.c | 36 +++---------------------------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/aia_device.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/aia_device.c
index 39cd26af5a69..32354e47c7d8 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kvm/aia_device.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/aia_device.c
@@ -12,36 +12,6 @@ 
 #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 
-static void unlock_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm, int vcpu_lock_idx)
-{
-	struct kvm_vcpu *tmp_vcpu;
-
-	for (; vcpu_lock_idx >= 0; vcpu_lock_idx--) {
-		tmp_vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, vcpu_lock_idx);
-		mutex_unlock(&tmp_vcpu->mutex);
-	}
-}
-
-static void unlock_all_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm)
-{
-	unlock_vcpus(kvm, atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus) - 1);
-}
-
-static bool lock_all_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm)
-{
-	struct kvm_vcpu *tmp_vcpu;
-	unsigned long c;
-
-	kvm_for_each_vcpu(c, tmp_vcpu, kvm) {
-		if (!mutex_trylock(&tmp_vcpu->mutex)) {
-			unlock_vcpus(kvm, c - 1);
-			return false;
-		}
-	}
-
-	return true;
-}
-
 static int aia_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -52,8 +22,8 @@  static int aia_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type)
 	if (irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))
 		return -EEXIST;
 
-	ret = -EBUSY;
-	if (!lock_all_vcpus(kvm))
+	ret = kvm_lock_all_vcpus(kvm);
+	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
 	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
@@ -65,7 +35,7 @@  static int aia_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type)
 	kvm->arch.aia.in_kernel = true;
 
 out_unlock:
-	unlock_all_vcpus(kvm);
+	kvm_unlock_all_vcpus(kvm);
 	return ret;
 }