diff mbox

[v8,0/2] TWL6030, TWL6032 GPADC driver

Message ID 2A7ABDFCE21540479A5AEB0244A684D5E3EE9C@DNCE04.ent.ti.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Oleksandr Kozaruk Aug. 16, 2013, 6:39 a.m. UTC
>On 08/15/13 13:59, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:03:02PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>>
>>>>> The changes to the original driver:
>>>>> - device tree adaptation;
>>>>
>>>> I couldn't see a binding document in this series or in mainline. Have I
>>>> looked in the wrong places?
>>>
>>> Nothing explicit supplied, but does it need one given it is doing only
>>> iio bindings (bindings/iio/iio-bindings.txt)
>>> plus twl child bindings
>>> (bindings/mfd/twl-family.txt)
>>
>> Every binding needs to be documented.
>>
>>>
>>> If it does, I guess absolutely everything does, then fair enough!
>>> I guess that would make sense as there is no way for someone writing
>>> a device tree to know that there is nothing else to be specified.
>>
>> Yup, that's why. Also, Linux isn't necessarily the only consumer, and
>> other consumers shouldn't need to read Linux code to figure out how a
>> particular binding is supposed to look.
>>
>Fair enough. Thanks for clearing that up.
>
>Oleksandr, could you send a follow up patch adding the required documentation?
>(mostly a cut and paste job from similar elements by the look of it).
>

Hello,

Is this good enough?

From 211e81ff4a146d9ec27443696a429e795c58dc30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr Kozaruk <oleksandr.kozaruk@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:14:11 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] iio: adc: Add bindigs documentation for twl6030 GPADC

Add required documentation for twl6030 GPADC device tree
bindings.

Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Kozaruk <oleksandr.kozaruk@ti.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/twl6030-gpadc.txt          | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/twl6030-gpadc.txt

Comments

Mark Rutland Aug. 16, 2013, 8:54 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 07:39:35AM +0100, Kozaruk, Oleksandr wrote:
> >On 08/15/13 13:59, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:03:02PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> The changes to the original driver:
> >>>>> - device tree adaptation;
> >>>>
> >>>> I couldn't see a binding document in this series or in mainline. Have I
> >>>> looked in the wrong places?
> >>>
> >>> Nothing explicit supplied, but does it need one given it is doing only
> >>> iio bindings (bindings/iio/iio-bindings.txt)
> >>> plus twl child bindings
> >>> (bindings/mfd/twl-family.txt)
> >>
> >> Every binding needs to be documented.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> If it does, I guess absolutely everything does, then fair enough!
> >>> I guess that would make sense as there is no way for someone writing
> >>> a device tree to know that there is nothing else to be specified.
> >>
> >> Yup, that's why. Also, Linux isn't necessarily the only consumer, and
> >> other consumers shouldn't need to read Linux code to figure out how a
> >> particular binding is supposed to look.
> >>
> >Fair enough. Thanks for clearing that up.
> >
> >Oleksandr, could you send a follow up patch adding the required documentation?
> >(mostly a cut and paste job from similar elements by the look of it).
> >
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Is this good enough?
> 
> From 211e81ff4a146d9ec27443696a429e795c58dc30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Oleksandr Kozaruk <oleksandr.kozaruk@ti.com>
> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:14:11 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] iio: adc: Add bindigs documentation for twl6030 GPADC
> 
> Add required documentation for twl6030 GPADC device tree
> bindings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Kozaruk <oleksandr.kozaruk@ti.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/twl6030-gpadc.txt          | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/twl6030-gpadc.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/twl6030-gpadc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/twl6030-gpadc.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6829420
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/twl6030-gpadc.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +Texas Instruments twl6030/twl6032 GPADC device driver
> +
> +Required properties:
> +       - compatible: must be "ti,twl6030-gpadc" for TWL6030 or
> +         "ti,twl6032-gpadc" for TWL6032
> +       - interrupts: interrupt number associated with it
> +       - #io-channel-cells: must be <1> - multiple IIO outputs

There should be a desscription of valid values for the io-channel-cells
as used by consumers.

Otherwise, this looks fine.

Thanks,
Mark.

> +
> +Example:
> +       adc {
> +               compatible = "ti,twl6030-gpadc";
> +               interrupts = <3>;
> +               #io-channel-cells = <1>;
> +       };
> 
> -- 
> 1.8.1.2
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/twl6030-gpadc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/twl6030-gpadc.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6829420
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/twl6030-gpadc.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ 
+Texas Instruments twl6030/twl6032 GPADC device driver
+
+Required properties:
+       - compatible: must be "ti,twl6030-gpadc" for TWL6030 or
+         "ti,twl6032-gpadc" for TWL6032
+       - interrupts: interrupt number associated with it
+       - #io-channel-cells: must be <1> - multiple IIO outputs
+
+Example:
+       adc {
+               compatible = "ti,twl6030-gpadc";
+               interrupts = <3>;
+               #io-channel-cells = <1>;
+       };