From patchwork Wed Jan 13 09:22:44 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Baruch Siach X-Patchwork-Id: 12016223 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014ACC433E0 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:25:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 912142339D for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:25:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 912142339D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tkos.co.il Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=6HQ6YRqeuGhqQsDEDgmiSTcPiz+J2kF80hsKEpcGeZ0=; b=VXOHBSrKHDXHT2rr5id0xSOUa XaYKuQVd6h6pFevDHwcLnaTwMPdHfKFN6tgOgSE9W5bBwQktLTRngjIiWR8ZHcCcONw+zTfWBMr22 yWlkQbpJVRl2By5ZDByDODrY8YE+leLGH1NO4bDnQOztIKFs8dlbC1w4NhBajePDRuPuMB1XI9Qey BERDDF8Oz+OT4LlPdAyaYFzcr3EzU6E06KyADvScWM0Wg5oyuHaH9mKXH+yHkeLwQvRk+izQM0Fko h3fGGwUDQ4nuKod/lXigdSjFwOG0QGiQSjqNdqx8pQbVSr79cuu8yBSaMd/+EURbbNjVVaI6rWSco lgaSrptsQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kzcNg-0000kL-Q9; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:23:56 +0000 Received: from guitar.tcltek.co.il ([192.115.133.116] helo=mx.tkos.co.il) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kzcNF-0000Xr-K4 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:23:31 +0000 Received: from tarshish.tkos.co.il (unknown [10.0.8.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.tkos.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8371944064A; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:23:27 +0200 (IST) From: Baruch Siach To: Thierry Reding , =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6n?= =?utf-8?q?ig?= , Lee Jones , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] gpio: mvebu: don't limit pwm period/duty_cycle to UINT_MAX Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:22:44 +0200 Message-Id: <36689bd45594c83338e876a502984626d5a55262.1610529002.git.baruch@tkos.co.il> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210113_042329_935941_8B97C527 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.05 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Andrew Lunn , Baruch Siach , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Gregory Clement , Russell King , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Chris Packham , Thomas Petazzoni , Ralph Sennhauser , Sascha Hauer , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Sebastian Hesselbarth Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org PWM on/off registers are limited to UINT_MAX. However the state period and duty_cycle fields are ns values of type u64. There is no reason to limit them to UINT_MAX. Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-König Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach --- drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c index 8673ba77af5a..6b017854ce61 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c @@ -669,9 +669,7 @@ static void mvebu_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, regmap_read(mvpwm->regs, mvebu_pwmreg_blink_on_duration(mvpwm), &u); val = (unsigned long long) u * NSEC_PER_SEC; val = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(val, mvpwm->clk_rate); - if (val > UINT_MAX) - state->duty_cycle = UINT_MAX; - else if (val) + if (val) state->duty_cycle = val; else state->duty_cycle = 1; @@ -681,9 +679,7 @@ static void mvebu_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, val += (unsigned long long) u; /* period = on + off duration */ val *= NSEC_PER_SEC; val = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(val, mvpwm->clk_rate); - if (val > UINT_MAX) - state->period = UINT_MAX; - else if (val) + if (val) state->period = val; else state->period = 1;