diff mbox series

arm64: mm: Use asid2idx() and asid feature macro for cleanup

Message ID 4aaabf1b-00c3-3365-e371-9d97dc0c06ab@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series arm64: mm: Use asid2idx() and asid feature macro for cleanup | expand

Commit Message

Yunfeng Ye Oct. 28, 2021, 12:27 p.m. UTC
Use asid2idx() and asid feature macro for cleanup.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@huawei.com>
---
 arch/arm64/mm/context.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Catalin Marinas Dec. 6, 2021, 4:23 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 08:27:23PM +0800, Yunfeng Ye wrote:
> Use asid2idx() and asid feature macro for cleanup.
> 
> No functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/mm/context.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/context.c b/arch/arm64/mm/context.c
> index cd72576ae2b7..076f14a75bd5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/context.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/context.c
> @@ -50,10 +50,10 @@ static u32 get_cpu_asid_bits(void)
>  		pr_warn("CPU%d: Unknown ASID size (%d); assuming 8-bit\n",
>  					smp_processor_id(),  fld);
>  		fallthrough;
> -	case 0:
> +	case ID_AA64MMFR0_ASID_8:
>  		asid = 8;
>  		break;
> -	case 2:
> +	case ID_AA64MMFR0_ASID_16:
>  		asid = 16;
>  	}

I think this change is fine.

> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static u64 new_context(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  	u64 generation = atomic64_read(&asid_generation);
> 
>  	if (asid != 0) {
> -		u64 newasid = generation | (asid & ~ASID_MASK);
> +		u64 newasid = generation | asid2idx(asid);
> 
>  		/*
>  		 * If our current ASID was active during a rollover, we
> @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ unsigned long arm64_mm_context_get(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  out_unlock:
>  	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_asid_lock, flags);
> 
> -	asid &= ~ASID_MASK;
> +	asid = asid2idx(asid);

While functionally the code is the same, I don't think this was the
intention of asid2idx(). It's meant to provide an index into asid_map,
while the ASID_MASK lines isolate the asid number and add a new
generation to it.
Yunfeng Ye Dec. 7, 2021, 2:21 a.m. UTC | #2
On 2021/12/7 0:23, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 08:27:23PM +0800, Yunfeng Ye wrote:
>> Use asid2idx() and asid feature macro for cleanup.
>>
>> No functional change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/mm/context.c | 8 ++++----
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/context.c b/arch/arm64/mm/context.c
>> index cd72576ae2b7..076f14a75bd5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/context.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/context.c
>> @@ -50,10 +50,10 @@ static u32 get_cpu_asid_bits(void)
>>  		pr_warn("CPU%d: Unknown ASID size (%d); assuming 8-bit\n",
>>  					smp_processor_id(),  fld);
>>  		fallthrough;
>> -	case 0:
>> +	case ID_AA64MMFR0_ASID_8:
>>  		asid = 8;
>>  		break;
>> -	case 2:
>> +	case ID_AA64MMFR0_ASID_16:
>>  		asid = 16;
>>  	}
> 
> I think this change is fine.
> 
>> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static u64 new_context(struct mm_struct *mm)
>>  	u64 generation = atomic64_read(&asid_generation);
>>
>>  	if (asid != 0) {
>> -		u64 newasid = generation | (asid & ~ASID_MASK);
>> +		u64 newasid = generation | asid2idx(asid);
>>
>>  		/*
>>  		 * If our current ASID was active during a rollover, we
>> @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ unsigned long arm64_mm_context_get(struct mm_struct *mm)
>>  out_unlock:
>>  	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_asid_lock, flags);
>>
>> -	asid &= ~ASID_MASK;
>> +	asid = asid2idx(asid);
> 
> While functionally the code is the same, I don't think this was the
> intention of asid2idx(). It's meant to provide an index into asid_map,
> while the ASID_MASK lines isolate the asid number and add a new
> generation to it.
> 
The commit 0c8ea531b774 ("arm64: mm: Allocate ASIDs in pairs") introduce the
asid2idx and idx2asid macro, but these macros is not really useful after the
commit f88f42f853a8 ("arm64: context: Free up kernel ASIDs if KPTI is not in use").

I think "(asid & ~ASID_MASK)" can be instead by a macro, it is the same code with
asid2idx(). Can it be renamed?  (eg, ctxid2asid)

Thanks.
Catalin Marinas Dec. 7, 2021, 10:50 a.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 10:21:26AM +0800, Yunfeng Ye wrote:
> On 2021/12/7 0:23, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 08:27:23PM +0800, Yunfeng Ye wrote:
> >> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static u64 new_context(struct mm_struct *mm)
> >>  	u64 generation = atomic64_read(&asid_generation);
> >>
> >>  	if (asid != 0) {
> >> -		u64 newasid = generation | (asid & ~ASID_MASK);
> >> +		u64 newasid = generation | asid2idx(asid);
> >>
> >>  		/*
> >>  		 * If our current ASID was active during a rollover, we
> >> @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ unsigned long arm64_mm_context_get(struct mm_struct *mm)
> >>  out_unlock:
> >>  	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_asid_lock, flags);
> >>
> >> -	asid &= ~ASID_MASK;
> >> +	asid = asid2idx(asid);
> > 
> > While functionally the code is the same, I don't think this was the
> > intention of asid2idx(). It's meant to provide an index into asid_map,
> > while the ASID_MASK lines isolate the asid number and add a new
> > generation to it.
> 
> The commit 0c8ea531b774 ("arm64: mm: Allocate ASIDs in pairs") introduce the
> asid2idx and idx2asid macro, but these macros is not really useful after the
> commit f88f42f853a8 ("arm64: context: Free up kernel ASIDs if KPTI is not in use").
> 
> I think "(asid & ~ASID_MASK)" can be instead by a macro, it is the same code with
> asid2idx(). Can it be renamed?  (eg, ctxid2asid)

Yes, that would work.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/context.c b/arch/arm64/mm/context.c
index cd72576ae2b7..076f14a75bd5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/context.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/context.c
@@ -50,10 +50,10 @@  static u32 get_cpu_asid_bits(void)
 		pr_warn("CPU%d: Unknown ASID size (%d); assuming 8-bit\n",
 					smp_processor_id(),  fld);
 		fallthrough;
-	case 0:
+	case ID_AA64MMFR0_ASID_8:
 		asid = 8;
 		break;
-	case 2:
+	case ID_AA64MMFR0_ASID_16:
 		asid = 16;
 	}

@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@  static u64 new_context(struct mm_struct *mm)
 	u64 generation = atomic64_read(&asid_generation);

 	if (asid != 0) {
-		u64 newasid = generation | (asid & ~ASID_MASK);
+		u64 newasid = generation | asid2idx(asid);

 		/*
 		 * If our current ASID was active during a rollover, we
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@  unsigned long arm64_mm_context_get(struct mm_struct *mm)
 out_unlock:
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_asid_lock, flags);

-	asid &= ~ASID_MASK;
+	asid = asid2idx(asid);

 	/* Set the equivalent of USER_ASID_BIT */
 	if (asid && arm64_kernel_unmapped_at_el0())