Message ID | 52F4DA40.4090804@elopez.com.ar (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:06:08AM -0300, Emilio López wrote: [snip a great explanation] Guys, can I get some Tested-by's on this? thx, Jason. > -----8<------ > > From ffdb49506e3ce92090c15e1f9b37f4d465097ac1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: =?UTF-8?q?Emilio=20L=C3=B3pez?= <emilio@elopez.com.ar> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 18:07:07 -0300 > Subject: [PATCH] clk: mvebu: fix name dependency during registration time > > Currently, mvebu_clk_gating_setup has a silly dependency on clock > registration order just to gather the parent clock name. This is > completely unnecesary, as it supports using an already provided name > via the clk_gating_soc_desc structs, and we can therefore solve this > issue with a 69+/- line patch. But, given that the parent name is > always "tclk" as default-hardcoded on mvebu_coreclk_setup(), we can > just default-hardcode it here too and get away with solving this > problem with a one-liner. > --- > drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c b/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c > index 25ceccf..6c63b43 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c > @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ void __init mvebu_clk_gating_setup(struct > device_node *np, > struct clk_gating_ctrl *ctrl; > struct clk *clk; > void __iomem *base; > - const char *default_parent = NULL; > + const char *default_parent = "tclk"; > int n; > > base = of_iomap(np, 0); > -- > 1.8.5.3
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 09:24:30AM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:06:08AM -0300, Emilio López wrote: > > [snip a great explanation] > > Guys, can I get some Tested-by's on this? > In case someone missed Emilio's comment about it, I gave his oneliner a test on A370 Reference Design. It worked just as well as Sebastian's. Tested-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> > > -----8<------ > > > > From ffdb49506e3ce92090c15e1f9b37f4d465097ac1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: =?UTF-8?q?Emilio=20L=C3=B3pez?= <emilio@elopez.com.ar> > > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 18:07:07 -0300 > > Subject: [PATCH] clk: mvebu: fix name dependency during registration time > > > > Currently, mvebu_clk_gating_setup has a silly dependency on clock > > registration order just to gather the parent clock name. This is > > completely unnecesary, as it supports using an already provided name > > via the clk_gating_soc_desc structs, and we can therefore solve this > > issue with a 69+/- line patch. But, given that the parent name is > > always "tclk" as default-hardcoded on mvebu_coreclk_setup(), we can > > just default-hardcode it here too and get away with solving this > > problem with a one-liner. > > --- > > drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c b/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c > > index 25ceccf..6c63b43 100644 > > --- a/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c > > +++ b/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c > > @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ void __init mvebu_clk_gating_setup(struct > > device_node *np, > > struct clk_gating_ctrl *ctrl; > > struct clk *clk; > > void __iomem *base; > > - const char *default_parent = NULL; > > + const char *default_parent = "tclk"; > > int n; > > > > base = of_iomap(np, 0); > > -- > > 1.8.5.3
On 07/02/2014 15:43, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 09:24:30AM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:06:08AM -0300, Emilio López wrote: >> >> [snip a great explanation] >> >> Guys, can I get some Tested-by's on this? >> > > In case someone missed Emilio's comment about it, I gave his oneliner > a test on A370 Reference Design. It worked just as well as Sebastian's. Well ok it's working but this patch is not better than Sebastian, it is even worth. I don't think it is a good idea at all to totally ignore the information given by the device tree. > > Tested-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> > >>> -----8<------ >>> >>> From ffdb49506e3ce92090c15e1f9b37f4d465097ac1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: =?UTF-8?q?Emilio=20L=C3=B3pez?= <emilio@elopez.com.ar> >>> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 18:07:07 -0300 >>> Subject: [PATCH] clk: mvebu: fix name dependency during registration time >>> >>> Currently, mvebu_clk_gating_setup has a silly dependency on clock >>> registration order just to gather the parent clock name. This is >>> completely unnecesary, as it supports using an already provided name >>> via the clk_gating_soc_desc structs, and we can therefore solve this >>> issue with a 69+/- line patch. But, given that the parent name is >>> always "tclk" as default-hardcoded on mvebu_coreclk_setup(), we can >>> just default-hardcode it here too and get away with solving this >>> problem with a one-liner. >>> --- >>> drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c b/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c >>> index 25ceccf..6c63b43 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c >>> +++ b/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c >>> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ void __init mvebu_clk_gating_setup(struct >>> device_node *np, >>> struct clk_gating_ctrl *ctrl; >>> struct clk *clk; >>> void __iomem *base; >>> - const char *default_parent = NULL; >>> + const char *default_parent = "tclk"; >>> int n; >>> >>> base = of_iomap(np, 0); >>> -- >>> 1.8.5.3 >
El 07/02/14 11:49, Gregory CLEMENT escribió: > On 07/02/2014 15:43, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 09:24:30AM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:06:08AM -0300, Emilio López wrote: >>> >>> [snip a great explanation] >>> >>> Guys, can I get some Tested-by's on this? >>> >> >> In case someone missed Emilio's comment about it, I gave his oneliner >> a test on A370 Reference Design. It worked just as well as Sebastian's. > > Well ok it's working but this patch is not better than Sebastian, it is > even worth. I don't think it is a good idea at all to totally ignore the > information given by the device tree. With a bit more work, you can replace the clk_get magic with a call to of_clk_get_parent_name() or similar to be able to keep overriding stuff from DT. This way it would completely match the behaviour on mvebu_coreclk_setup (default to "tclk", allow overriding with DT). Emilio
On 07/02/2014 16:00, Emilio López wrote: > El 07/02/14 11:49, Gregory CLEMENT escribió: >> On 07/02/2014 15:43, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 09:24:30AM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: >>>> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:06:08AM -0300, Emilio López wrote: >>>> >>>> [snip a great explanation] >>>> >>>> Guys, can I get some Tested-by's on this? >>>> >>> >>> In case someone missed Emilio's comment about it, I gave his oneliner >>> a test on A370 Reference Design. It worked just as well as Sebastian's. >> >> Well ok it's working but this patch is not better than Sebastian, it is >> even worth. I don't think it is a good idea at all to totally ignore the >> information given by the device tree. > > With a bit more work, you can replace the clk_get magic with a call to > of_clk_get_parent_name() or similar to be able to keep overriding stuff > from DT. This way it would completely match the behaviour on > mvebu_coreclk_setup (default to "tclk", allow overriding with DT). > I think you didn't have a look on our implementation: the name of the clock are created by the driver during the initialization. That's why we need that the parent clock are initialized before the gating clock. I know that for the sunxi clock you choose to list all your clock name in the device tree, but we didn't make this choice on purpose. It is not as trivial as you suggested. I didn't have a look on the atmel clocks, and I don't know if they have this kind of issue, as they also have to deal with multiple parents, they may have different issues. Gregory > Emilio >
On 02/07/2014 03:49 PM, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > On 07/02/2014 15:43, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 09:24:30AM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:06:08AM -0300, Emilio López wrote: >>> >>> [snip a great explanation] >>> >>> Guys, can I get some Tested-by's on this? >>> >> >> In case someone missed Emilio's comment about it, I gave his oneliner >> a test on A370 Reference Design. It worked just as well as Sebastian's. > > Well ok it's working but this patch is not better than Sebastian, it is > even worth. I don't think it is a good idea at all to totally ignore the Tstststs.. Gregory please re-read the above slooooowly.. and think about where you'd put me in. Hint: "this patch", "not better than", "even worse". ;) > information given by the device tree. Actually, I have no strong opinion about how we fix the issue now. Emilio's patch is short and very suitable for a fix. I'll test later this weekend. For the long run, I definitely prefer probe ordering within clk frame work or even better some early_device stuff. >> Tested-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> >> >>>> -----8<------ >>>> >>>> From ffdb49506e3ce92090c15e1f9b37f4d465097ac1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>> From: =?UTF-8?q?Emilio=20L=C3=B3pez?= <emilio@elopez.com.ar> >>>> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 18:07:07 -0300 >>>> Subject: [PATCH] clk: mvebu: fix name dependency during registration time >>>> >>>> Currently, mvebu_clk_gating_setup has a silly dependency on clock >>>> registration order just to gather the parent clock name. This is Of course, the dependency is not silly but we are just ignoring that some clocks actually have a different parent clock. As long as we are not interested in the frequency and they all depend on a fixed-clock it makes no difference. Also, on some gates, we do some tweaking, e.g. on Dove there is a clock gate for the GBE ip that we loop back to the GBE PHY gate.. some day I may be so bored to get it straight. >>>> completely unnecesary, as it supports using an already provided name >>>> via the clk_gating_soc_desc structs, and we can therefore solve this >>>> issue with a 69+/- line patch. But, given that the parent name is >>>> always "tclk" as default-hardcoded on mvebu_coreclk_setup(), we can >>>> just default-hardcode it here too and get away with solving this >>>> problem with a one-liner. I agree with the default hard-coded "tclk" for now. But in general, clocking can become very nasty and rather than coding the whole fscking clock tree like the imx clock tree beast does, it would be much more readable to be able separate the clock drivers into different parts. Sebastian >>>> --- >>>> drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c b/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c >>>> index 25ceccf..6c63b43 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c >>>> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ void __init mvebu_clk_gating_setup(struct >>>> device_node *np, >>>> struct clk_gating_ctrl *ctrl; >>>> struct clk *clk; >>>> void __iomem *base; >>>> - const char *default_parent = NULL; >>>> + const char *default_parent = "tclk"; >>>> int n; >>>> >>>> base = of_iomap(np, 0); >>>> -- >>>> 1.8.5.3
diff --git a/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c b/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c index 25ceccf..6c63b43 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c +++ b/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ void __init mvebu_clk_gating_setup(struct device_node *np, struct clk_gating_ctrl *ctrl; struct clk *clk; void __iomem *base; - const char *default_parent = NULL; + const char *default_parent = "tclk"; int n;