From patchwork Wed Aug 17 07:54:37 2011 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Russell King - ARM Linux X-Patchwork-Id: 1073162 Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) by demeter1.kernel.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7H7tlGA031457 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 07:56:08 GMT Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([2001:4978:20e::1]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Qtaxl-0005RR-2W; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 07:54:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=canuck.infradead.org) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Qtaxk-0008L3-1Q; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 07:54:56 +0000 Received: from [2002:4e20:1eda::1] (helo=caramon.arm.linux.org.uk) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Qtaxd-0008IZ-GW for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 07:54:50 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arm.linux.org.uk; s=caramon; h=Date:Sender:Message-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:Subject:Cc:To:From:References:In-Reply-To; bh=OA02kBpSGSxcbT619CZNuqFfmPno7BKXaN4syMKbWtw=; b=MzhE5CqWLWwQ4Eps2NL6+Sz6ya2PBVuM5vfDgezlgK+eIWmOQOxbS8ZGmiCoP2Jzoojn8ZVDKhAtpPNU6PQOevQsj+gZczU3pZh5wAL6gRYCM1+sd0zLgnmZHW6a0MnzHTz5J/X1Eh2S9FnIwx7PB8savqg6rcMY8Ff2fOkkWtg=; Received: from e0022681537dd.dyn.arm.linux.org.uk ([2002:4e20:1eda:1:222:68ff:fe15:37dd] helo=rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QtaxP-0001tx-Tv; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:54:36 +0100 Received: from rmk by rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QtaxR-0007NH-5p; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:54:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20110817075104.GC1006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20110817075104.GC1006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Imre Kaloz , Krzysztof Halasa , Ben Dooks Subject: [PATCH 10/10] ARM: io: remove IO_SPACE_LIMIT from SA11x0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:54:37 +0100 X-CRM114-Version: 20090807-BlameThorstenAndJenny ( TRE 0.7.6 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20110817_035450_432548_6545FFBF X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.29 ) X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 on canuck.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (1.2 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (demeter1.kernel.org [140.211.167.41]); Wed, 17 Aug 2011 07:56:08 +0000 (UTC) SA11x0 only uses IO_SPACE_LIMIT for SOC_COMMON, so we can use the default value in asm/io.h. Signed-off-by: Russell King --- arch/arm/mach-sa1100/include/mach/io.h | 6 ++---- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/include/mach/io.h b/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/include/mach/io.h index d8b43f3..dfc27ff 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/include/mach/io.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/include/mach/io.h @@ -10,11 +10,9 @@ #ifndef __ASM_ARM_ARCH_IO_H #define __ASM_ARM_ARCH_IO_H -#define IO_SPACE_LIMIT 0xffffffff - /* - * We don't actually have real ISA nor PCI buses, but there is so many - * drivers out there that might just work if we fake them... + * __io() is required to be an equivalent mapping to __mem_pci() for + * SOC_COMMON to work. */ #define __io(a) __typesafe_io(a) #define __mem_pci(a) (a)