From patchwork Thu May 16 20:37:11 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Russell King X-Patchwork-Id: 2580001 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-process-083081@patchwork1.kernel.org Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [85.118.1.10]) by patchwork1.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA4C3FE1F for ; Thu, 16 May 2013 20:37:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([2001:4978:20e::2]) by casper.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Ud4vo-0000n3-QT; Thu, 16 May 2013 20:37:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Ud4vl-0005Kb-M2; Thu, 16 May 2013 20:37:41 +0000 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Ud4vh-0005Js-IH for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 20:37:38 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arm.linux.org.uk; s=caramon; h=Date:Sender:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From:References:In-Reply-To; bh=AblrspPekrYk1tHKvFy6r3gJUopcNqxiU2dvp0tpncM=; b=enWFWYoi4ESMjaFiEUPiGTj/WnrjLofuZdjZOgf7CF/wv8K0oRDDL+E4QHNQqNSxv7s2cWopFrTGsBEQhtQe8gpa7e7GCoWMz+LQT7tm6fAV00tAo+ubNUIjV7gMy/WiqwSU8JTN3IaRb5QX0MG/xVHvkv5zLUmWJFWt8u8e+u4=; Received: from e0022681537dd.dyn.arm.linux.org.uk ([2002:4e20:1eda:1:222:68ff:fe15:37dd]:34849 helo=rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Ud4vI-00081R-Bj; Thu, 16 May 2013 21:37:12 +0100 Received: from rmk by rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Ud4vH-0004Jz-F6; Thu, 16 May 2013 21:37:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20130516202921.GW18614@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20130516202921.GW18614@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> From: Russell King To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 7/9] I2C: mv64xxx: remove I2C_M_NOSTART code Message-Id: Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 21:37:11 +0100 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20130516_163737_944231_15A28394 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.19 ) X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-4.9 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [78.32.30.218 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Cc: Jason Cooper , Wolfram Sang , "Mark A. Greer" , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, "Ben Dooks \(embedded platforms\)" , Sebastian Hesselbarth X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org As this driver does not advertise protocol mangling support (I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING is not set), having code to act on I2C_M_NOSTART is illogical, and in any case isn't supportable on anything but the first message - which makes no sense. Remove the I2C_M_NOSTART code. Signed-off-by: Russell King --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c | 26 +++++--------------------- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c index a82ab25..d160f8c 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c @@ -419,28 +419,12 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_execute_msg(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data, struct i2c_msg *msg, spin_lock_irqsave(&drv_data->lock, flags); mv64xxx_i2c_prepare_for_io(drv_data, msg); - if (unlikely(msg->flags & I2C_M_NOSTART)) { /* Skip start/addr phases */ - if (drv_data->msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) { - /* No action to do, wait for slave to send a byte */ - drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_CONTINUE; - drv_data->state = - MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_SLAVE_DATA; - } else { - drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_DATA; - drv_data->state = - MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_SLAVE_ACK; - drv_data->bytes_left--; - } + if (is_first) { + drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START; + drv_data->state = MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_START_COND; } else { - if (is_first) { - drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START; - drv_data->state = - MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_START_COND; - } else { - drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_ADDR_1; - drv_data->state = - MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_ADDR_1_ACK; - } + drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_ADDR_1; + drv_data->state = MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_ADDR_1_ACK; } drv_data->send_stop = is_last;