@@ -95,9 +95,10 @@ static int clk_factors_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
struct clk_factors *factors = to_clk_factors(hw);
struct clk_hw *parent, *best_parent = NULL;
int i, num_parents;
- unsigned long parent_rate, best = 0, child_rate, best_child_rate = 0;
+ unsigned long parent_rate, best = 0, child_rate, best_child_rate;
+ unsigned long d_rate, best_d_rate = ~0ul;
- /* find the parent that can help provide the fastest rate <= rate */
+ /* find the parent that can help provide the best rate */
num_parents = clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw);
for (i = 0; i < num_parents; i++) {
struct factors_request factors_req = {
@@ -116,10 +117,18 @@ static int clk_factors_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
factors->get_factors(&factors_req);
child_rate = factors_req.rate;
- if (child_rate <= req->rate && child_rate > best_child_rate) {
+ if (child_rate >= req->rate)
+ d_rate = child_rate - req->rate;
+ else
+ d_rate = req->rate - child_rate;
+
+ if (d_rate < best_d_rate) {
best_parent = parent;
best = parent_rate;
best_child_rate = child_rate;
+ if (d_rate == 0)
+ break;
+ best_d_rate = d_rate;
}
}
The best rate of a clock may be a bit greater than the requested one. In such a case, the rate setting from a child clock was rejected. This patch fixes the problem searching a 'best rate' instead of a 'fastest rate <= rate'. Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr> --- drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-factors.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)