Message ID | acdecda4-b11a-4e15-9ac9-6d2696218012@www.fastmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [GIT,PULL] ARM: SoC fixes for 6.0-rc6 | expand |
Hi Arnd, On 9/22/22 08:32, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The following changes since commit 12f09234bde51810b3f7412b2b5c84af4c07cfb1: > > Merge tag 'renesas-fixes-for-v6.0-tag1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/geert/renesas-devel into arm/fixes (2022-09-02 12:05:28 +0200) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git tags/soc-fixes-6.0-rc6 > > for you to fetch changes up to aaa58141a5d7647b14d812dde92b8d680e0985db: > > Merge tag 'at91-fixes-6.0-2' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/at91/linux into arm/fixes (2022-09-15 21:54:07 +0200) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > ARM: SoC fixes for 6.0-rc6 > > Another set of fixes for fixes for the soc tree: Looks like this pull request just missed the one I am replying to: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220918205038.3017866-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com/ In case Linus has not had a chance to pull it just yet, could you amend it? Thanks
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 10:19 AM Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote: > > In case Linus has not had a chance to pull it just yet, could you amend > it? I did see this email, but as I expect to be AFK for the next few hours, I took Arnd's pull request as-is. I could pull your Broadcom fixes directly on top if you/Arnd would prefer that as a solution? Linus
The pull request you sent on Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:32:32 +0200:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git tags/soc-fixes-6.0-rc6
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/c69cf88cda5faca0e411babb67ac0d8bfd8b4646
Thank you!
On 9/22/22 11:13, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 10:19 AM Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> In case Linus has not had a chance to pull it just yet, could you amend >> it? > > I did see this email, but as I expect to be AFK for the next few > hours, I took Arnd's pull request as-is. > > I could pull your Broadcom fixes directly on top if you/Arnd would > prefer that as a solution? Thanks for the offer, no real urgency on my side, if there is a -rc7, maybe Arnd can submit a follow up for ARM SoC fixes, as there is a good chance we will accumulate more of those between -rc6 and then. If not, and Arnd is fine with it, yes please pull mine directly, thanks!
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022, at 8:17 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 9/22/22 11:13, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> I could pull your Broadcom fixes directly on top if you/Arnd would >> prefer that as a solution? > > Thanks for the offer, no real urgency on my side, if there is a -rc7, > maybe Arnd can submit a follow up for ARM SoC fixes, as there is a good > chance we will accumulate more of those between -rc6 and then. If not, > and Arnd is fine with it, yes please pull mine directly, thanks! Yes, that was my plan already, sorry for not making that clearer already: I still have a couple of fixes pull requests in a backlog, including yours. Since the fixes branch was already large and the rest has not been in my tree yet, I decided to send whatever I had already, but planned to pick the rest up tomorrow morning to send early next week after I get a successful test result from the build bots. Arnd
On 9/22/22 14:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022, at 8:17 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> On 9/22/22 11:13, Linus Torvalds wrote: >>> I could pull your Broadcom fixes directly on top if you/Arnd would >>> prefer that as a solution? >> >> Thanks for the offer, no real urgency on my side, if there is a -rc7, >> maybe Arnd can submit a follow up for ARM SoC fixes, as there is a good >> chance we will accumulate more of those between -rc6 and then. If not, >> and Arnd is fine with it, yes please pull mine directly, thanks! > > Yes, that was my plan already, sorry for not making that clearer already: > > I still have a couple of fixes pull requests in a backlog, including > yours. Since the fixes branch was already large and the rest has > not been in my tree yet, I decided to send whatever I had already, > but planned to pick the rest up tomorrow morning to send early next > week after I get a successful test result from the build bots. Works for me, thanks!