diff mbox

ARM: OMAP4: PM: Warn users about usage of older bootloaders

Message ID alpine.DEB.2.00.1302062343230.12769@utopia.booyaka.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Paul Walmsley Feb. 6, 2013, 11:44 p.m. UTC
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013, Rajendra Nayak wrote:

> OMAP4 CHIP level PM works only with newer bootloaders. The
> dependency on the bootloader comes from the fact that the
> kernel is missing reset and initialization code for some
> devices.
> 
> While the right thing to do is to add reset and init code in
> the kernel, for some co-processor IP blocks like DSP and IVA
> it means downloading firmware into each one of them to execute
> idle instructions.
> 
> While a feasible solution is worked upon on how such IP blocks
> can be better handled in the kernel, in the interim, to avoid
> any further frustration to users testing PM on OMAP4 and finding
> it broken, warn them about the bootloader being a possible
> cause.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
> Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
> Cc: R Sricharan <r.sricharan@ti.com>

Thanks Rajendra, I appreciate the patch.  I've tweaked it slightly and the 
following is what's queued here; hopefully it can go in for v3.9.


- Paul

From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 17:54:43 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP4: PM: Warn users about usage of older bootloaders

OMAP4 CHIP level PM works only with newer bootloaders. The
dependency on the bootloader comes from the fact that the
kernel is missing reset and initialization code for some
devices.

While the right thing to do is to add reset and init code in
the kernel, for some co-processor IP blocks like DSP and IVA
it means downloading firmware into each one of them to execute
idle instructions.

While a feasible solution is worked upon on how such IP blocks
can be better handled in the kernel, in the interim, to avoid
any further frustration to users testing PM on OMAP4 and finding
it broken, warn them about the bootloader being a possible
cause.

Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: R Sricharan <r.sricharan@ti.com>
[paul@pwsan.com: tweaked warning messages and comments slightly]
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c |   19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Kevin Hilman Feb. 8, 2013, 1:29 a.m. UTC | #1
Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> writes:

> On Mon, 4 Feb 2013, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>
>> OMAP4 CHIP level PM works only with newer bootloaders. The
>> dependency on the bootloader comes from the fact that the
>> kernel is missing reset and initialization code for some
>> devices.
>> 
>> While the right thing to do is to add reset and init code in
>> the kernel, for some co-processor IP blocks like DSP and IVA
>> it means downloading firmware into each one of them to execute
>> idle instructions.
>> 
>> While a feasible solution is worked upon on how such IP blocks
>> can be better handled in the kernel, in the interim, to avoid
>> any further frustration to users testing PM on OMAP4 and finding
>> it broken, warn them about the bootloader being a possible
>> cause.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
>> Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
>> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>> Cc: R Sricharan <r.sricharan@ti.com>
>
> Thanks Rajendra, I appreciate the patch.  I've tweaked it slightly and the 
> following is what's queued here; hopefully it can go in for v3.9.
>
>
> - Paul
>
> From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 17:54:43 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP4: PM: Warn users about usage of older bootloaders
>
> OMAP4 CHIP level PM works only with newer bootloaders. The
> dependency on the bootloader comes from the fact that the
> kernel is missing reset and initialization code for some
> devices.
>
> While the right thing to do is to add reset and init code in
> the kernel, for some co-processor IP blocks like DSP and IVA
> it means downloading firmware into each one of them to execute
> idle instructions.
>
> While a feasible solution is worked upon on how such IP blocks
> can be better handled in the kernel, in the interim, to avoid
> any further frustration to users testing PM on OMAP4 and finding
> it broken, warn them about the bootloader being a possible
> cause.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
> Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
> Cc: R Sricharan <r.sricharan@ti.com>
> [paul@pwsan.com: tweaked warning messages and comments slightly]
> Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>

FWIW

Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>

> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c |   19 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c
> index aa6fd98..502ed9b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c
> @@ -77,8 +77,18 @@ static int omap4_pm_suspend(void)
>  		omap_set_pwrdm_state(pwrst->pwrdm, pwrst->saved_state);
>  		pwrdm_set_logic_retst(pwrst->pwrdm, pwrst->saved_logic_state);
>  	}
> -	if (ret)
> +	if (ret) {
>  		pr_crit("Could not enter target state in pm_suspend\n");
> +		/*
> +		 * OMAP4 chip PM currently works only with certain (newer)
> +		 * versions of bootloaders. This is due to missing code in the
> +		 * kernel to properly reset and initialize some devices.
> +		 * Warn the user about the bootloader version being one of the
> +		 * possible causes.
> +		 * http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg218641.html
> +		 */
> +		pr_warn("A possible cause could be an old bootloader - try u-boot >= v2012.07\n");
> +	}
>  	else
>  		pr_info("Successfully put all powerdomains to target state\n");
>  
> @@ -146,6 +156,13 @@ int __init omap4_pm_init(void)
>  	}
>  
>  	pr_err("Power Management for TI OMAP4.\n");
> +	/*
> +	 * OMAP4 chip PM currently works only with certain (newer)
> +	 * versions of bootloaders. This is due to missing code in the
> +	 * kernel to properly reset and initialize some devices.
> +	 * http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg218641.html
> +	 */
> +	pr_warn("u-boot >= v2012.07 is required for full PM support\n");
>  
>  	ret = pwrdm_for_each(pwrdms_setup, NULL);
>  	if (ret) {
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c
index aa6fd98..502ed9b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c
@@ -77,8 +77,18 @@  static int omap4_pm_suspend(void)
 		omap_set_pwrdm_state(pwrst->pwrdm, pwrst->saved_state);
 		pwrdm_set_logic_retst(pwrst->pwrdm, pwrst->saved_logic_state);
 	}
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret) {
 		pr_crit("Could not enter target state in pm_suspend\n");
+		/*
+		 * OMAP4 chip PM currently works only with certain (newer)
+		 * versions of bootloaders. This is due to missing code in the
+		 * kernel to properly reset and initialize some devices.
+		 * Warn the user about the bootloader version being one of the
+		 * possible causes.
+		 * http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg218641.html
+		 */
+		pr_warn("A possible cause could be an old bootloader - try u-boot >= v2012.07\n");
+	}
 	else
 		pr_info("Successfully put all powerdomains to target state\n");
 
@@ -146,6 +156,13 @@  int __init omap4_pm_init(void)
 	}
 
 	pr_err("Power Management for TI OMAP4.\n");
+	/*
+	 * OMAP4 chip PM currently works only with certain (newer)
+	 * versions of bootloaders. This is due to missing code in the
+	 * kernel to properly reset and initialize some devices.
+	 * http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg218641.html
+	 */
+	pr_warn("u-boot >= v2012.07 is required for full PM support\n");
 
 	ret = pwrdm_for_each(pwrdms_setup, NULL);
 	if (ret) {