From patchwork Mon Dec 20 22:03:33 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: andrey.konovalov@linux.dev X-Patchwork-Id: 12696944 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9BA7C433F5 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 22:26:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=HJdTWaIxoAbh04SY2eOmqebQUKlrNCt5cyCylcn+QvA=; b=P3xfZXZDSALyHz aiXbV9reEq8bVloziflaXpVaC3SmTvTZP6doXFtb/rrcibEWD6pyikpy3Eu+UeGjK292aix7pzAlH zoF+oax4ReiZrh4afXoScgaFQUEdagKDmymXpmE8Ggp2J+pOzvIC7oFbskm/7ocEB+ubILkrSw3+s ILzn5sk6cI+1iNNlpQ+8/B9RNK+d+oc3kd880g3DG71GoMcIeIOR1qi/JCu5kSdeDNM0acWOoloJo bDaGS2lS3iVwv53FmeSFQJDrUSBqaUjw2EQPzhlckU10Jsgymg2rpWR1gYt2uu71dUVyb2MKmrGya CxQhUnx6lttJmLQM81dQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mzR5i-004oZV-Tp; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 22:25:12 +0000 Received: from out2.migadu.com ([188.165.223.204]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mzQku-004dVM-1c for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 22:03:42 +0000 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1640037818; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=boV4BKjs1buZcE6U9f3+9ZNSDpvsszrp49sK5MVcXV4=; b=CYE0KUzVKdfV5PBus7/tRmDoGpI/gWr0XopdZYXGi4uhusTNAoIvDTT4dhYiYV5KyQ2OYw 27OC3ERG3mVUfSZaXyA/nTdpDMC843M9NT+GmimPVa9utIPgJ18L4P+zl3wqGS5Rk2iOJT JEKDhS1GvwsfkmZ2T4CHUTXG9+LsAbU= From: andrey.konovalov@linux.dev To: Marco Elver , Alexander Potapenko , Andrew Morton Cc: Andrey Konovalov , Dmitry Vyukov , Andrey Ryabinin , kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, Vincenzo Frascino , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Peter Collingbourne , Evgenii Stepanov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrey Konovalov Subject: [PATCH mm v4 39/39] kasan: improve vmalloc tests Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 23:03:33 +0100 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: linux.dev X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211220_140340_419775_F50ED684 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.55 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Andrey Konovalov Update the existing vmalloc_oob() test to account for the specifics of the tag-based modes. Also add a few new checks and comments. Add new vmalloc-related tests: - vmalloc_helpers_tags() to check that exported vmalloc helpers can handle tagged pointers. - vmap_tags() to check that SW_TAGS mode properly tags vmap() mappings. - vm_map_ram_tags() to check that SW_TAGS mode properly tags vm_map_ram() mappings. - vmalloc_percpu() to check that SW_TAGS mode tags regions allocated for __alloc_percpu(). The tagging of per-cpu mappings is best-effort; proper tagging is tracked in [1]. [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215019 Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov --- lib/test_kasan.c | 189 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 183 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/test_kasan.c b/lib/test_kasan.c index 847cdbefab46..ae7b2e703f1b 100644 --- a/lib/test_kasan.c +++ b/lib/test_kasan.c @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include @@ -1049,21 +1050,181 @@ static void kmalloc_double_kzfree(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, kfree_sensitive(ptr)); } +static void vmalloc_helpers_tags(struct kunit *test) +{ + void *ptr; + int rv; + + /* This test is intended for tag-based modes. */ + KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_OFF(test, CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC); + + KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_ON(test, CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC); + + ptr = vmalloc(PAGE_SIZE); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr); + + /* Check that the returned pointer is tagged. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, (u8)get_tag(ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_MIN); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, (u8)get_tag(ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_KERNEL); + + /* Make sure exported vmalloc helpers handle tagged pointers. */ + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, is_vmalloc_addr(ptr)); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, vmalloc_to_page(ptr)); + + /* Make sure vmalloc'ed memory permissions can be changed. */ + rv = set_memory_ro((unsigned long)ptr, 1); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GE(test, rv, 0); + rv = set_memory_rw((unsigned long)ptr, 1); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GE(test, rv, 0); + + vfree(ptr); +} + static void vmalloc_oob(struct kunit *test) { - void *area; + char *v_ptr, *p_ptr; + struct page *page; + size_t size = PAGE_SIZE / 2 - KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE - 5; KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_ON(test, CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC); + v_ptr = vmalloc(size); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, v_ptr); + /* - * We have to be careful not to hit the guard page. + * We have to be careful not to hit the guard page in vmalloc tests. * The MMU will catch that and crash us. */ - area = vmalloc(3000); - KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, area); - KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, ((volatile char *)area)[3100]); - vfree(area); + /* Make sure in-bounds accesses are valid. */ + v_ptr[0] = 0; + v_ptr[size - 1] = 0; + + /* + * An unaligned access past the requested vmalloc size. + * Only generic KASAN can precisely detect these. + */ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC)) + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, ((volatile char *)v_ptr)[size]); + + /* An aligned access into the first out-of-bounds granule. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, ((volatile char *)v_ptr)[size + 5]); + + /* Check that in-bounds accesses to the physical page are valid. */ + page = vmalloc_to_page(v_ptr); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, page); + p_ptr = page_address(page); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, p_ptr); + p_ptr[0] = 0; + + vfree(v_ptr); + + /* + * We can't check for use-after-unmap bugs in this nor in the following + * vmalloc tests, as the page might be fully unmapped and accessing it + * will crash the kernel. + */ +} + +static void vmap_tags(struct kunit *test) +{ + char *p_ptr, *v_ptr; + struct page *p_page, *v_page; + size_t order = 1; + + /* + * This test is specifically crafted for the software tag-based mode, + * the only tag-based mode that poisons vmap mappings. + */ + KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_ON(test, CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS); + + KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_ON(test, CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC); + + p_page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, order); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, p_page); + p_ptr = page_address(p_page); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, p_ptr); + + v_ptr = vmap(&p_page, 1 << order, VM_MAP, PAGE_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, v_ptr); + + /* + * We can't check for out-of-bounds bugs in this nor in the following + * vmalloc tests, as allocations have page granularity and accessing + * the guard page will crash the kernel. + */ + + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, (u8)get_tag(v_ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_MIN); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, (u8)get_tag(v_ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_KERNEL); + + /* Make sure that in-bounds accesses through both pointers work. */ + *p_ptr = 0; + *v_ptr = 0; + + /* Make sure vmalloc_to_page() correctly recovers the page pointer. */ + v_page = vmalloc_to_page(v_ptr); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, v_page); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, p_page, v_page); + + vunmap(v_ptr); + free_pages((unsigned long)p_ptr, order); +} + +static void vm_map_ram_tags(struct kunit *test) +{ + char *p_ptr, *v_ptr; + struct page *page; + size_t order = 1; + + /* + * This test is specifically crafted for the software tag-based mode, + * the only tag-based mode that poisons vm_map_ram mappings. + */ + KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_ON(test, CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS); + + page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, order); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, page); + p_ptr = page_address(page); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, p_ptr); + + v_ptr = vm_map_ram(&page, 1 << order, -1); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, v_ptr); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, (u8)get_tag(v_ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_MIN); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, (u8)get_tag(v_ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_KERNEL); + + /* Make sure that in-bounds accesses through both pointers work. */ + *p_ptr = 0; + *v_ptr = 0; + + vm_unmap_ram(v_ptr, 1 << order); + free_pages((unsigned long)p_ptr, order); +} + +static void vmalloc_percpu(struct kunit *test) +{ + char __percpu *ptr; + int cpu; + + /* + * This test is specifically crafted for the software tag-based mode, + * the only tag-based mode that poisons percpu mappings. + */ + KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_ON(test, CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS); + + ptr = __alloc_percpu(PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE); + + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { + char *c_ptr = per_cpu_ptr(ptr, cpu); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, (u8)get_tag(c_ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_MIN); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, (u8)get_tag(c_ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_KERNEL); + + /* Make sure that in-bounds accesses don't crash the kernel. */ + *c_ptr = 0; + } + + free_percpu(ptr); } /* @@ -1097,6 +1258,18 @@ static void match_all_not_assigned(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, (u8)get_tag(ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_KERNEL); free_pages((unsigned long)ptr, order); } + + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC)) + return; + + for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) { + size = (get_random_int() % 1024) + 1; + ptr = vmalloc(size); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr); + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, (u8)get_tag(ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_MIN); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, (u8)get_tag(ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_KERNEL); + vfree(ptr); + } } /* Check that 0xff works as a match-all pointer tag for tag-based modes. */ @@ -1202,7 +1375,11 @@ static struct kunit_case kasan_kunit_test_cases[] = { KUNIT_CASE(kasan_bitops_generic), KUNIT_CASE(kasan_bitops_tags), KUNIT_CASE(kmalloc_double_kzfree), + KUNIT_CASE(vmalloc_helpers_tags), KUNIT_CASE(vmalloc_oob), + KUNIT_CASE(vmap_tags), + KUNIT_CASE(vm_map_ram_tags), + KUNIT_CASE(vmalloc_percpu), KUNIT_CASE(match_all_not_assigned), KUNIT_CASE(match_all_ptr_tag), KUNIT_CASE(match_all_mem_tag),