From patchwork Tue Sep 15 06:55:26 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Sai Prakash Ranjan X-Patchwork-Id: 11775665 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74CD1618 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 06:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45D7420897 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 06:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="db4b+dfk"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mg.codeaurora.org header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.b="fU9U16gi" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 45D7420897 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=RhhpC6DWEU5vQiwuAetzU2kO0D/nBeZlEJQn+uUVtUg=; b=db4b+dfk+AI+pGXCMchd+ztCx LV31nMMGmZM8t1Zq+Of3InszGNK5S+LdHzhV9kfZulNFa/PzHCc5KxUKW5NHIJuMn7uNKIGie7xyj WO0wNu++r9yIlp7O4BrVAsiswMLjKXXGFhEL9K1RS/FeNGV6HF87Ie34xTeoJOizm1Ptcmnwagq16 AKsp/wBk1L0s/CsQyyxnQ/mmN7LYJI3ZNI27iJXxcAW288eun0S1nENEIGf/oPQPH5qZX6F7QH6qT rDk56kCG6HZAKC03iyfzJ+XE0TB1Ky62dRYwvd25mkEB+qFZNgjyb2Hlt81OBCYFF24F0KeygeYBR BYCjP7wBw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kI4sy-0004X2-9L; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 06:56:16 +0000 Received: from m43-7.mailgun.net ([69.72.43.7]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kI4sm-0004Uh-4W for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 06:56:13 +0000 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1600152972; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version: References: In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Date: Subject: Cc: To: From: Sender; bh=31GvM1X5XrPQR2a24S8gJeyLSwWFdH/nLg2HUCMHilk=; b=fU9U16girGBzdwR/0d/iRZsXnUbY1TYBZcHXhQHckziQO9ZBiW6NkMdnsaluJ1myo8IM8PGL gQcmDe8dXeWnaMpXLlL0PaW/jF/uwPJb7OQKbocmOS+RPpNOiqd65D+XVtCvLJHrIFcC6enG s7c3Hl+ne6qBX3UFXMSxDIeMXjQ= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 69.72.43.7 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyJiYzAxZiIsICJsaW51eC1hcm0ta2VybmVsQGxpc3RzLmluZnJhZGVhZC5vcmciLCAiYmU5ZTRhIl0= Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n02.prod.us-west-2.postgun.com with SMTP id 5f6065707f21d51b301910a9 (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 06:55:44 GMT Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 93360C433CA; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 06:55:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, BAYES_00, SPF_FAIL, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from blr-ubuntu-253.qualcomm.com (blr-bdr-fw-01_GlobalNAT_AllZones-Outside.qualcomm.com [103.229.18.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: saiprakash.ranjan) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 68322C433C8; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 06:55:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 68322C433C8 Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org From: Sai Prakash Ranjan To: Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Douglas Anderson , Stephen Boyd Subject: [PATCHv5 2/2] soc: qcom: llcc: Support chipsets that can write to llcc Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:25:26 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200915_025612_653999_E507198D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.28 ) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (0.0 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [69.72.43.7 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [69.72.43.7 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Isaac J. Manjarres" , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Sai Prakash Ranjan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: "Isaac J. Manjarres" Older chipsets may not be allowed to configure certain LLCC registers as that is handled by the secure side software. However, this is not the case for newer chipsets and they must configure these registers according to the contents of the SCT table, while keeping in mind that older targets may not have these capabilities. So add support to allow such configuration of registers to enable capacity based allocation and power collapse retention for capable chipsets. Reason for choosing capacity based allocation rather than the default way based allocation is because capacity based allocation allows more finer grain partition and provides more flexibility in configuration. As for the retention through power collapse, it has an advantage where the cache hits are more when we wake up from power collapse although it does burn more power but the exact power numbers are not known at the moment. Signed-off-by: Isaac J. Manjarres Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson [saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org: use existing config and reword commit msg] Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd --- drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c index 14311060099d..8b79bbf96f52 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ #define LLCC_TRP_ATTR0_CFGn(n) (0x21000 + SZ_8 * n) #define LLCC_TRP_ATTR1_CFGn(n) (0x21004 + SZ_8 * n) +#define LLCC_TRP_SCID_DIS_CAP_ALLOC 0x21f00 +#define LLCC_TRP_PCB_ACT 0x21f04 + #define BANK_OFFSET_STRIDE 0x80000 /** @@ -89,6 +92,7 @@ struct llcc_slice_config { struct qcom_llcc_config { const struct llcc_slice_config *sct_data; int size; + bool need_llcc_cfg; }; static const struct llcc_slice_config sc7180_data[] = { @@ -122,11 +126,13 @@ static const struct llcc_slice_config sdm845_data[] = { static const struct qcom_llcc_config sc7180_cfg = { .sct_data = sc7180_data, .size = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7180_data), + .need_llcc_cfg = true, }; static const struct qcom_llcc_config sdm845_cfg = { .sct_data = sdm845_data, .size = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_data), + .need_llcc_cfg = false, }; static struct llcc_drv_data *drv_data = (void *) -EPROBE_DEFER; @@ -318,7 +324,8 @@ size_t llcc_get_slice_size(struct llcc_slice_desc *desc) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(llcc_get_slice_size); -static int _qcom_llcc_cfg_program(const struct llcc_slice_config *config) +static int _qcom_llcc_cfg_program(const struct llcc_slice_config *config, + const struct qcom_llcc_config *cfg) { int ret; u32 attr1_cfg; @@ -361,6 +368,22 @@ static int _qcom_llcc_cfg_program(const struct llcc_slice_config *config) if (ret) return ret; + if (cfg->need_llcc_cfg) { + u32 disable_cap_alloc, retain_pc; + + disable_cap_alloc = config->dis_cap_alloc << config->slice_id; + ret = regmap_write(drv_data->bcast_regmap, + LLCC_TRP_SCID_DIS_CAP_ALLOC, disable_cap_alloc); + if (ret) + return ret; + + retain_pc = config->retain_on_pc << config->slice_id; + ret = regmap_write(drv_data->bcast_regmap, + LLCC_TRP_PCB_ACT, retain_pc); + if (ret) + return ret; + } + if (config->activate_on_init) { desc.slice_id = config->slice_id; ret = llcc_slice_activate(&desc); @@ -369,7 +392,8 @@ static int _qcom_llcc_cfg_program(const struct llcc_slice_config *config) return ret; } -static int qcom_llcc_cfg_program(struct platform_device *pdev) +static int qcom_llcc_cfg_program(struct platform_device *pdev, + const struct qcom_llcc_config *cfg) { int i; u32 sz; @@ -380,7 +404,7 @@ static int qcom_llcc_cfg_program(struct platform_device *pdev) llcc_table = drv_data->cfg; for (i = 0; i < sz; i++) { - ret = _qcom_llcc_cfg_program(&llcc_table[i]); + ret = _qcom_llcc_cfg_program(&llcc_table[i], cfg); if (ret) return ret; } @@ -488,7 +512,7 @@ static int qcom_llcc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) mutex_init(&drv_data->lock); platform_set_drvdata(pdev, drv_data); - ret = qcom_llcc_cfg_program(pdev); + ret = qcom_llcc_cfg_program(pdev, cfg); if (ret) goto err;