| Message ID | fad5a977d8ecdd43b37d7028b1bc32d8667b65a2.1475489558.git-series.maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > The generic pin configuration and multiplexing should be preferred now, > even though we still support the old one. > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt > index 69617220c5d6..e8b7cf64fdf1 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt > @@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ pins it needs, and how they should be configured, with regard to muxer > configuration, drive strength and pullups. If one of these options is > not set, its actual value will be unspecified. > > +This driver supports the generic pin multiplexing and configuration > +bindings. Should we list which options are supported? We don't support them all. ChenYu > + > +*** Deprecated pin configuration and multiplexing binding > + > Required subnode-properties: > > - allwinner,pins: List of strings containing the pin name. > -- > git-series 0.8.10
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 10:32:12AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > > The generic pin configuration and multiplexing should be preferred now, > > even though we still support the old one. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt | 5 +++++ > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt > > index 69617220c5d6..e8b7cf64fdf1 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt > > @@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ pins it needs, and how they should be configured, with regard to muxer > > configuration, drive strength and pullups. If one of these options is > > not set, its actual value will be unspecified. > > > > +This driver supports the generic pin multiplexing and configuration > > +bindings. > > Should we list which options are supported? We don't support them all. Yep, I'll add that. Thanks! Maxime
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt index 69617220c5d6..e8b7cf64fdf1 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt @@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ pins it needs, and how they should be configured, with regard to muxer configuration, drive strength and pullups. If one of these options is not set, its actual value will be unspecified. +This driver supports the generic pin multiplexing and configuration +bindings. + +*** Deprecated pin configuration and multiplexing binding + Required subnode-properties: - allwinner,pins: List of strings containing the pin name.
The generic pin configuration and multiplexing should be preferred now, even though we still support the old one. Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)