mbox series

[v5,00/21] drm/bridge: Make panel and bridge probe order consistent

Message ID 20211021073947.499373-1-maxime@cerno.tech (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series drm/bridge: Make panel and bridge probe order consistent | expand

Message

Maxime Ripard Oct. 21, 2021, 7:39 a.m. UTC
Hi,

We've encountered an issue with the RaspberryPi DSI panel that prevented the
whole display driver from probing.

The issue is described in detail in the commit 7213246a803f ("drm/vc4: dsi:
Only register our component once a DSI device is attached"), but the basic idea
is that since the panel is probed through i2c, there's no synchronization
between its probe and the registration of the MIPI-DSI host it's attached to.

We initially moved the component framework registration to the MIPI-DSI Host
attach hook to make sure we register our component only when we have a DSI
device attached to our MIPI-DSI host, and then use lookup our DSI device in our
bind hook.

However, all the DSI bridges controlled through i2c are only registering their
associated DSI device in their bridge attach hook, meaning with our change
above, we never got that far, and therefore ended up in the same situation than
the one we were trying to fix for panels.

The best practice to avoid those issues is to register its functions only after
all its dependencies are live. We also shouldn't wait any longer than we should
to play nice with the other components that are waiting for us, so in our case
that would mean moving the DSI device registration to the bridge probe.

This has been tested on vc4 (with sn65dsi83 and ps8640), msm (sn65dsi86,
lt9611), kirin (adv7511) and exynos.

Let me know what you think,
Maxime

---

Changes from v4:
  - Rebased on current drm-misc-next
  - Collected the various tags
  - Fix for Kirin
  - Added conversion patch for msm

Changes from v3:
  - Converted exynos and kirin
  - Converted all the affected bridge drivers
  - Reworded the documentation a bit

Changes from v2:
  - Changed the approach as suggested by Andrzej, and aligned the bridge on the
    panel this time.
  - Fixed some typos

Changes from v1:
  - Change the name of drm_of_get_next function to drm_of_get_bridge
  - Mention the revert of 87154ff86bf6 and squash the two patches that were
    reverting that commit
  - Add some documentation
  - Make drm_panel_attach and _detach succeed when no callback is there

Maxime Ripard (20):
  drm/bridge: adv7533: Switch to devm MIPI-DSI helpers
  drm/bridge: adv7511: Register and attach our DSI device at probe
  drm/bridge: anx7625: Switch to devm MIPI-DSI helpers
  drm/bridge: anx7625: Register and attach our DSI device at probe
  drm/bridge: lt8912b: Switch to devm MIPI-DSI helpers
  drm/bridge: lt8912b: Register and attach our DSI device at probe
  drm/bridge: lt9611: Switch to devm MIPI-DSI helpers
  drm/bridge: lt9611: Register and attach our DSI device at probe
  drm/bridge: lt9611uxc: Switch to devm MIPI-DSI helpers
  drm/bridge: lt9611uxc: Register and attach our DSI device at probe
  drm/bridge: ps8640: Switch to devm MIPI-DSI helpers
  drm/bridge: ps8640: Register and attach our DSI device at probe
  drm/bridge: sn65dsi83: Fix bridge removal
  drm/bridge: sn65dsi83: Switch to devm MIPI-DSI helpers
  drm/bridge: sn65dsi83: Register and attach our DSI device at probe
  drm/bridge: sn65dsi86: Switch to devm MIPI-DSI helpers
  drm/bridge: sn65dsi86: Register and attach our DSI device at probe
  drm/bridge: tc358775: Switch to devm MIPI-DSI helpers
  drm/bridge: tc358775: Register and attach our DSI device at probe
  drm/kirin: dsi: Adjust probe order

Rob Clark (1):
  drm/msm/dsi: Adjust probe order

 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511.h     |   1 -
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c |  15 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7533.c     |  20 +---
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c    |  40 ++++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt8912b.c     |  31 ++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c      |  62 ++++-------
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611uxc.c   |  65 +++++------
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c       | 107 ++++++++++---------
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358775.c            |  50 +++++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c        |  88 ++++++++-------
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c        | 101 +++++++++--------
 drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/kirin/dw_drm_dsi.c |  52 +++++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c                |  50 +++++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h                |   2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c           |  22 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_manager.c        |   6 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h                |   2 +
 17 files changed, 348 insertions(+), 366 deletions(-)

Comments

Maxime Ripard Oct. 25, 2021, 3:16 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Sam,

On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 05:22:55PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
> 
> > Let me know what you think,
> 
> apply the lot to drm-misc-next. Maybe wait for an r-b or a-b on the kirin
> patch but the rest is IMO good to go.

I had a compilation error since the rebase of the v4, so I sent a new
version. John Stultz has tested this series and given his tested-by, and
is the kirin maintainer.

I guess it's enough?

Maxime
Maxime Ripard Oct. 27, 2021, 8:42 a.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 06:54:34PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
> 
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 05:16:36PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi Sam,
> > 
> > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 05:22:55PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > Hi Maxime,
> > > 
> > > > Let me know what you think,
> > > 
> > > apply the lot to drm-misc-next. Maybe wait for an r-b or a-b on the kirin
> > > patch but the rest is IMO good to go.
> > 
> > I had a compilation error since the rebase of the v4, so I sent a new
> > version. John Stultz has tested this series and given his tested-by, and
> > is the kirin maintainer.
> > 
> > I guess it's enough?
> 
> Yeah, go ahead and get it applied.

It turns out dim is not happy with just a Tested-by :)

I'll ask around for an acked-by or reviewed-by

Maxime